Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

4.02s

  • United States v. Meyer

    346 F. Supp. 973 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 1972

    And in In re Brown, 454 F.2d 999, 1007-1008 (D.C. Cir. 1971), Judge Robinson referred to the need to establish “a contumacious intent.” See also Sykes v. … United States v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Nelson v. Insignia/ESG, Inc.

    215 F. Supp. 2d 143 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 12, 2002

    Following LaPrade , the Court in Brown v. Wheat First Secs., Inc., 257 F.3d *156 821 (D.C.Cir.2001), declined to extend Cole to non-statutory state claims. … .”); Alford v.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Trump

    275 F. Supp. 3d 167 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 2017

    Brown, MD, ECF No. 13-11 (“Brown Decl.”); Decl. of Margaret C. Wilmoth, ECF No. 13-13 (“Wilmoth Decl.”); Decl. of Regan V. … See Perry v. Brown, 671 F.3d 1052, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2012), vacated and remanded sub nom. Hollingsworth v. Perry, 133 S.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Al-Owhali v. Ashcroft

    279 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 29, 2003

    Co. v. … Lujan v.

    Cited 76 timesPublished
  • Blakeney v. Wainwright

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 2011

    Board of Parole dated November 15, 1978). The Board of Parole granted the petitioner parole on the Youth Act sentence on December 11, 1978, at which time he began to serve the adult sentences. See id., Ex. … Hill v. Johnston, 750 F. Supp. 2d 103, 105-06 (D.D.C. 2010); see Sutherland v. McCall, 709 F.2d 730, 732 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Valles-Hall v. Center for Nonprofit Advancement

    481 F. Supp. 2d 118 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2007

    Cones v. … Id. at 1131 (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999)).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Banks v. District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 6, 2010

    Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, 568 F. Supp. 2d 44, 50 (D.D.C. 2008) (citing Reid, 401 F.3d at 521 (quoting Kerkam, 862 F.2d at 887)) (internal quotation omitted). … Brown, 568 F. Supp. 2d at 52 (internal quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fullmore v. District of Columbia

    40 F. Supp. 3d 174 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 9, 2014

    Background At the time of the events at issue in this case, D.F. was a 12-year-old special education student enrolled at Ron Brown Middle School. Compl. ¶¶ 7, 9. … Following this evaluation, DCPS indicated that D.F.’s disability classification would remain “emotionally disabled” and that he would continue at Ron Brown. Id. at 82.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Olive v. Robinson

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 1, 2017

    See Haz`nes v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Calz'fano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Roman Catholic Archbishop of Washington v. Sebelius

    920 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 25, 2013

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Wheaton Order, at *2, citing EPA v. Brown, 431 U.S. 99 (1977). Plaintiffs instead rely on the second prong of the prudential ripeness inquiry: the hardship to the parties.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • All Party Parliamentary Group on Extraordinary Rendition v. United States Department of Defense

    851 F. Supp. 2d 169 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 2, 2012

    Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Byrd v. Metropolitan Police Department, Dc

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 2016

    Price v. Phoenix Home Life Mut., 203 F.3d 53 (D.C. Cir. 1999). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Watson v. District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2024

    Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997)). … Pierce v. District of Columbia, 128 F. Supp. 3d 250, 267 (D.D.C. 2015) (Brown Jackson, J.).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mercy General Hospital v. Burwell

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 2019

    However, the Court cannot conclude that the pre-Moratorium Provider Reimbursement Review Board (“PRRB” or the “Board”) decisions cited by the Administrator—Concourse Nursing Home v. Travelers Insurance Co., PRRB Dec. … , Board decisions become the policies of the Secretary.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wilks v. Apfel

    113 F. Supp. 2d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2000

    Richardson, 402 U.S. at 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. N.L.R.B., 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938)); Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 705 (D.C.Cir.1986). … See Simms v. Sullivan, 877 F.2d 1047, 1049 (D.C.Cir.1989); Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d at 705-06 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Philip Morris USA

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 2023

    P’ship v. Brown, 684 F. Supp. at 329. … P’ship v. Brown, 684 F. Supp. at 329.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Whitehorn

    710 F. Supp. 803 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 11, 1989

    As the Court said in Brown v. … See Brown v. Ohio, supra, 432 U.S. at 165-66 , 97 S.Ct. at 2225 ; Jordan, 653 F.2d at 873 ; United States v.

    Reversed on other grounds by United States v. Susan Rosenberg, 888 F.2d 1406 (1989)Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Cobell v. Norton

    407 F. Supp. 2d 140 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 2005

    See also, Brown v. … See, e.g., Pete v. UMW Welf. & Retirement Fund, 517 F.2d 1275 , 1289, 1290 & n. 74 (D.C.Cir.1975) (en banc) (30% reduction); Davis v. Board of School Comm’rs, 526 F.2d 865, 868-69 (5th Cir.1976); Kane v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Fields v. Smith

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 4, 2016

    Rumsfeld v. … (quoting Counselman v. Hitchcock, 142 U.S. 547, 563 (1892)); see also Rothgery v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Senior Executives Ass'n v. United States

    576 F. Supp. 1207 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1983

    In AFGE v. … See also Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593, 601 , 92 S.Ct. 2694, 2699 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972). 23 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.