Case law

Medica Insurance Company v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2025

Id. § 1395x(v)(1)(A). … Org., Inc. v. Azar, 384 F. Supp. 3d 80, 94 (D.D.C. 2019) (“The rules relating to Administrator review of a Board decision . . . are applicable to the maximum extent possible for any nonprovider hearing.”

St. Michale's Medical Center v. Leavitt

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2009

Michael’s Medical Center, et al. v. … Michael’s Medical Center, et al. v.

Filebark v. U.S. Department of Transportation

468 F. Supp. 2d 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2006

Our Circuit Court, in Johnson v. … Plaintiff Todd then called the Merit Systems Protection Board in Denver seeking review of the ATC Level classification and the person to whom he spoke told him that the Board would not pursue his grievance. (Pis.’

Dodge v. Trustees of the National Gallery of Art

326 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2004

This Agreement resolves all matters arising from Appellant’s removal from the Gallery; including his Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) appeal, DC-0752-03-0011-1-1 (Appeal) of this action; and any and all claims of any … See Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 , 81 S.Ct. 247 , 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960).

Wahl v. Main

280 F. 974 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 3, 1922

The same invention was considered by this court in the case of Wahl v. Wrieht (Nov. 7, 1921) - App. D. C. - , 276 Fed. 455 . … The same holding has *975 been made by the Examiner and Board of Examiners in Chief in the present ease, and in this we again concur. [ 1 ] Walil failed to make the counts of the present issue in his original application,

Smith v. Saint Elizabeth Hospital Department of Behavioral Health

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 11, 2025

Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (per curiam)). C. … Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2014). Smith has pled that he belongs to a protected class: His opposition states that he is African American. See Opp’n at 5.

Bridgeport Hospital v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2022

If the Board lacks authority to decide the question presented on appeal, the Board may grant expedited judicial review, which allows the hospitals to bring their challenge in federal court. … And Judge Moss has held, based on that provision, that the agency can make “an across-the-board 0.2 percent reduction to the standardized amount” based on that provision. See Shands Jacksonville Med. Ctr. v.

Kennedy v. Gray

83 F. Supp. 3d 385 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2015

Brown v. Corrections Corp. of Am., 603 F. Supp. 2d 73, 79 (D.D.C. 2009) (quoting Price v. District of Columbia, 545 F. Supp. 2d 89, 94 (D.D.C. 2008)); accord Hardy v. District of Columbia, 601 F. … Although Kennedy was briefly considered for disability retirement, the Police and Firefighters’ Retirement and Relief Board ultimately determined—prior to a disability retirement hearing—that he was ineligible because he

Theus v. Selene Finance LLC

98 F. Supp. 3d 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 14, 2015

Supp. 2d 59, 65 (D.D.C. 2011); see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). I. … See id.; see also Browning, 292 F.3d at 242.

United States v. United States

417 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 1976

Nat'l Small Shipments Traffic Conf. v. … Bd. v. CISC, Em.App., 522 F.2d 637, 640 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976); United States v.

Arms & Drury, Inc. v. Burg

90 F.2d 400 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 1937

She also cites Curriden v. Middleton, 37 App.D.C. 568 . … Brown v. McDonald (C.C.A.) 133 F. 897 , 68 L.R.A. 462 ; Kurtz v. Brown (C.C.A.) 152 F. 372 , 11 Ann.

Maduka v. Del Toro

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2026

Talavera v. Shah, 638 F.3d 303, 308 (D.C. Cir. 2011). … Krzywicki v. Del Toro, 755 F. Supp. 3d 1, 10 (D.D.C. 2024); see Roberts v. United States, 741 F.3d 152, 158 (D.C. Cir. 2014); see also 10 Sissel v.

United States v. Georgieff

100 F. Supp. 3d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 24, 2015

See Klapprott v. … Date: April 24, 2015 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Brownfield v. Bair

541 F. Supp. 2d 35 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2008

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 .

Hisler v. Gallaudet University

344 F. Supp. 2d 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 21, 2004

The plaintiff appealed the OPM decision with the Merit System Protection Board (“MSPB”). Id. The MSPB dismissed the appeal but gave the plaintiff the option of requesting a board review of its ruling. Def.’s Mot. … P’ship v.

Wilson v. Planet

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 25, 2023

Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987) (citing Redwood v. Council of the District of Columbia, 679 F.2d 931, 933 (D.C. Cir. 1982)). … Brown v.

Global Tropical Imports and Exports LLC v. Zinke

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 2019

See Lamie v. U.S. … See, e.g., State v. Brown, 318 N.W.2d 370 (Wis. 1982); People v. Caddy, 540 P.2d 1089 (Colo. 1975).

McKinley v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 2010

from agency staff to the board. … Corp. v. U.S.

Aero-Mecaniques v. Marzall

104 F. Supp. 591 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 13, 1952

The Board of Appeals rejected this argument of the plaintiffs. … Co. v. Gould Mersereau Co., Inc., 2d Cir., 1925, 6 F.2d 793 ; Traitel Marble Co. v. U. T. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co., 2d Cir., 1927, 18 F.2d 66 ; Davies v.

National Council of Agricultural Employers v. United States Department of Labor

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 16, 2023

Decl. of 16 Kathleen Brown, Vice President of H-2A Program at IOA (“Am. Brown Decl.”), Ex. 2 to Renewed Mot. … Brown’s amended declaration also calls into question whether Plaintiff has “substantiate[d]” that these alleged losses are likely to occur. Wisc. Gas Co., 758 F.2d at 674; see also Standing Rock Sioux Tribe v. U.S.