Case law

Slaughter v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 17, 2025

Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Three-quarters of a century later, the Supreme Court decided Free Enterprise Fund v. … as official votes of a Board member, allowing him to draw the salary of a Board member, etc. . . .

Jefferson v. Science Applications International Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 2025

See Garvey v. Admin. Rev. Bd., United States Dep’t of Lab., 56 F.4th 110, 115 (D.C. Cir. 2022). In Garvey v. Administrative Review Board, the D.C. … Adhikari v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 845 F.3d 184, 197 (5th Cir. 2017) (quoting Marshall v. Exelis Sys. Corp., No. 13-cv-545, 2014 WL 1213473, at *6 (D. Colo. Mar. 24, 2014)); see also Al Maqaleh v.

United States v. Pollard

335 F. Supp. 868 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 1971

Crump v. Anderson, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 173 , 352 F.2d 649 (1965). Also Goldsby v. United States, 160 U.S. 70 , 16 S.Ct. 216 , 40 L.Ed. 343 (1895); Clarke v. Huff, 73 App.D.C. 351 , 119 F.2d 204 (1941); Walker v. … See also Washington v. Clemmer et al., 119 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 339 F.2d 715 (1964); Brown v. Fauntleroy, 143 U.S. App.D.C. 116, 442 F.2d 838 (1971).

Agee v. Sebelius

668 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 2, 2009

This suit named the California Medical Board, the Vermont Medical Board, the National Practitioners Data Bank, FAHC, and Green Mount Urology as defendants. … See Crane v. Carr, 814 F.2d 758, 761 (D.C.Cir.1987); Chrysler Corp. v. Gen. Motors Corp., 589 F.Supp. 1182, 1196 (D.D.C.1984).

Dixon v. United States Navy Retirement Program

District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2009

See Janaskie v. United States, 77 Fed. CI. 654, 657 (2007). … that plaintiffs complaint presents a claim for veteran's disability benefits, such claims must be presented to the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, whose decision may be appealed first to the Board

Lombardo v. Handler

397 F. Supp. 792 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 1975

See, e. g., Soucie v. David, 145 U.S.App.D.C. 144, 448 F.2d 1067, 1073 (1971); Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. … But see Food Chemical News, Inc. v. Davis, 378 F.Supp. 1048 (D.D.C.1974) ; compare Aviation Consumer Action Project v. Yohe, C.A. No. 707-73 (D.D.C. June 24, 1974). See also Nader v. Baroody, C.A.

Leib v. Veterans Administration

546 F. Supp. 758 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 7, 1982

Weisberg v. Department of Justice, 627 F.2d at 370 . … In United States v.

Long v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2019

In a letter to the Medical Center’s Board of Directors dated April 5, 2004, the MEC outlined three recommended actions and “request[ed]” that they “be adopted by the Board.” Id. … V.

St. Michale's Medical Center v. Leavitt

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2009

Michael’s Medical Center, et al. v. … Michael’s Medical Center, et al. v.

Dodge v. Trustees of the National Gallery of Art

326 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2004

This Agreement resolves all matters arising from Appellant’s removal from the Gallery; including his Merit Systems Protection Board (Board) appeal, DC-0752-03-0011-1-1 (Appeal) of this action; and any and all claims of any … See Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968); Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 , 81 S.Ct. 247 , 5 L.Ed.2d 231 (1960).

American Bankers Ass'n v. Connell

447 F. Supp. 296 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 1978

Allen, 396 U.S. 168, 192-193 , 90 S.Ct. 314 , 24 L.Ed.2d 345 (1969); Board of Dir. & Officers, Forbes Federal Credit Union v. National Credit Union Administration, 477 F.2d 777, 784 (10th Cir. 1973). … Co. v. United States, 288 U.S. 269 , 283, 53 S.Ct. 337 , 77 L.Ed. 739 (1933); Alabama Association of Insurance Agents v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 533 F.2d 224 (5th Cir. 1976).

Klute v. Shinseki

797 F. Supp. 2d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 12, 2011

See Plaintiffs Opposition Appendix (“PL’s Opp’n App.”) at 14 (Sullivan Deposition). 3 During his time at the VA, the plaintiff worked for four different judges on the Board of Veterans Appeals. … v.

Smith v. Saint Elizabeth Hospital Department of Behavioral Health

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 11, 2025

Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quotation marks omitted) (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (per curiam)). C. … Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2014). Smith has pled that he belongs to a protected class: His opposition states that he is African American. See Opp’n at 5.

Davis v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2012

DAVIS, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. … Brown, Jr.

Kennedy v. Gray

83 F. Supp. 3d 385 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2015

Brown v. Corrections Corp. of Am., 603 F. Supp. 2d 73, 79 (D.D.C. 2009) (quoting Price v. District of Columbia, 545 F. Supp. 2d 89, 94 (D.D.C. 2008)); accord Hardy v. District of Columbia, 601 F. … Although Kennedy was briefly considered for disability retirement, the Police and Firefighters’ Retirement and Relief Board ultimately determined—prior to a disability retirement hearing—that he was ineligible because he

Theus v. Selene Finance LLC

98 F. Supp. 3d 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 14, 2015

Supp. 2d 59, 65 (D.D.C. 2011); see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). I. … See id.; see also Browning, 292 F.3d at 242.

United States v. United States

417 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 1976

Nat'l Small Shipments Traffic Conf. v. … Bd. v. CISC, Em.App., 522 F.2d 637, 640 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 951 , 96 S.Ct. 1724 , 48 L.Ed.2d 194 (1976); United States v.

Coleman v. Napolitano

65 F. Supp. 3d 99 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2014

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Davis v.

Hudert v. ALION SCIENCE & TECH. CORP.

429 F. Supp. 2d 99 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 18, 2006

Although the entire “Findings and Recommendations” section of the Accident Review Board’s report is conspicuously redacted, the conclusion section states that the Board found that the accident had been caused by Grunley-Walsh … The Board based this conclusion, in part, on the inference that because the steam valve in manhole 11 was found open after the accident, Mr.

Arms & Drury, Inc. v. Burg

90 F.2d 400 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 1937

She also cites Curriden v. Middleton, 37 App.D.C. 568 . … Brown v. McDonald (C.C.A.) 133 F. 897 , 68 L.R.A. 462 ; Kurtz v. Brown (C.C.A.) 152 F. 372 , 11 Ann.