Case law

Sieverding v. American Bar Ass'n

439 F. Supp. 2d 111 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 17, 2006

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). The complaint need only set forth a short and plain statement of the claim, giving the defendant fair notice of the claim and the grounds upon which .it rests. … Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .

Federal Housing Finance Agency v. Marron

725 F. Supp. 2d 147 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2010

The other cases were originally captioned as Middleton v. Raines (Civ. No. 07-1221), Arthur v. Mudd (Civ. No. 07-2130), and Agnes v. Raines (Civ. No. 08-1093). … LaBranche & Co., Inc. v. LaBranche, 433 F. Supp. 2d 372,380 (S.D.N.Y. 2006); see also Daily Income Fund, Inc. v.

Musgrove v. Government of the District of Columbia

775 F. Supp. 2d 158 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 7, 2011

Regs. 5-E, § 1401.2(n)(2002), and (ii) “[violation of the rules, regulations, or lawful orders of the Board of Education or any directive of the Superintendent of Schools, issued pursuant to the rules of the Board of Education … See also, e.g., Brown v. District of Columbia, 251 F.Supp.2d 152, 165 (D.D.C.2003) (finding that the plaintiff failed to satisfy § 12-309 when she sent letters to the District’s police chief, D.C.

Noble v. Melody

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2017

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 1  Plaintiff resides in Dallas, Texas.

American Federation of Teachers v. Bullock

539 F. Supp. 2d 161 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2008

and that IFSB was aware that the Executive Board had designated the account’s signatories by board resolution. … See McKenna v.

Salazar v. District of Columbia

30 F. Supp. 3d 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2014

V. … V. v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., 743 F.2d 932, 941 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

Maryland v. Sodexho, Inc.

474 F. Supp. 2d 160 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 2007

Wilson v. Pena, 79 F.3d 154, 165 (D.C.Cir.1996); accord Wiley v. Johnson, 436 F.Supp.2d 91, 94-95 (D.D.C.2006). … See Brown v.

Sanchez Mora v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 18, 2025

v. … Supp. 2d at 290 n.1; accord Brown, 793 F.

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania v. Sebelius

847 F. Supp. 2d 125 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2012

The fiscal intermediary makes a final determination, which is appealable to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board ("PRRB" or "Board"). 42 U.S.C. § 1395oo(a). … See id. at 63-65. 10 Of course, as the Secretary correctly indicates, the Administrator's decision, not the Board's, is the final decision of the agency. See, e.g., Am. Med. Int'l, Inc. v.

Williams v. Glickman

936 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1996

Brown v. Gardner, — U.S. -, -, 115 S.Ct. 552, 556 , 130 L.Ed.2d 462 (1994). … Flesch v. Eastern Pa. Psychiatric Inst., 472 F.Supp. 798, 801-02 (E.D.Pa.1979) (quoting Browning Debenture Holders’ Committee v. DASA Corp., 524 F.2d 811, 817 (2d Cir.1975)).

Henneghan v. Trafford

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 2024

See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151–52 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (“[A] district court errs in failing to consider a pro se litigant’s complaint ‘in light of’ all filings[.]” … Brown v. F.B.I., 873 F. Supp. 2d 388, 408 (D.D.C. 2012) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)).

Greene v. Howard University

271 F. Supp. 609 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 1967

Section IX and Section V must be read together. … Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518 , 4 L.Ed. 629 .

Act Now to Stop War & End Racism Coalition v. District of Columbia

798 F. Supp. 2d 134 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 2011

Board of Elections and Ethics noted on its website that “the new rules allow campaign posters to remain up 30 days after the general election....” … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002).

Stewart v. Washington

301 F. Supp. 610 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 1969

The validity of such an oath was sustained in Knight v. Board of Regents of University of State of N. Y., 269 F.Supp. 339 (S.D.N.Y. 1967) aff’d 390 U.S. 36 , 88 S.Ct. 816 , 19 L.Ed.2d 812 (1968). … Russell, 384 U.S. 11 , 86 S.Ct. 1238 , 16 L.Ed.2d 321 (1966); Keyishian v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New York, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967).

Blumcraft of Pittsburgh v. Ladd

238 F. Supp. 648 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 1965

The Patent Office Board of Appeals sustained the rejection of the claim to the single post in the application at issue (No. 54,864), but recommended the allowance of a single claim in the combined application (No. 54,387) … Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., 365 U.S. 336 , 81 S.Ct. 599 , 5 L.Ed.2d 592 (1960).

Fleming v. Coward

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2012

Leighton v. Coe, 130 F .2d 841,842 (D.C. Cir. 1942); see Bullardv. United States, No. 09-1670,2009 WL 2872739, at *1 (D.D.C. … (quoting Field v. Manbeck, No. 90-1030, 1990 WL 116818, at *3 (D.D.C. Aug. 2, 1990)).

Jefferson v. Science Applications International Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 2025

See Garvey v. Admin. Rev. Bd., United States Dep’t of Lab., 56 F.4th 110, 115 (D.C. Cir. 2022). In Garvey v. Administrative Review Board, the D.C. … Adhikari v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 845 F.3d 184, 197 (5th Cir. 2017) (quoting Marshall v. Exelis Sys. Corp., No. 13-cv-545, 2014 WL 1213473, at *6 (D. Colo. Mar. 24, 2014)); see also Al Maqaleh v.

United States v. Pollard

335 F. Supp. 868 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 1971

Crump v. Anderson, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 173 , 352 F.2d 649 (1965). Also Goldsby v. United States, 160 U.S. 70 , 16 S.Ct. 216 , 40 L.Ed. 343 (1895); Clarke v. Huff, 73 App.D.C. 351 , 119 F.2d 204 (1941); Walker v. … See also Washington v. Clemmer et al., 119 U.S.App.D.C. 216 , 339 F.2d 715 (1964); Brown v. Fauntleroy, 143 U.S. App.D.C. 116, 442 F.2d 838 (1971).

Fisher v. Fulwood, Jr.

920 F. Supp. 2d 139 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 2013

Board of Parole. ). … Drake v. FAA, 291 F.3d 59, 66 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (emphasis in original) (quoting Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94 (1980)); see I.A.M Nat’l Perzsz`orz Fund v. Indus. Gear Mfg. Co., 723 F.2d 944, 949 (D.C.

Dixon v. United States Navy Retirement Program

District Court, District of Columbia · May 26, 2009

See Janaskie v. United States, 77 Fed. CI. 654, 657 (2007). … that plaintiffs complaint presents a claim for veteran's disability benefits, such claims must be presented to the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs, whose decision may be appealed first to the Board