Case law

Bell v. Carson

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 2025

• Despite knowing that Bell was preparing for a Merit Systems Protection Board hearing, Malone required her to attend approximately six hours of staff meetings in one week. Id. ¶ 9(e). … Brown v. Mills, 674 F. Supp. 2d 182, 197 n.8 (D.D.C. 2009); Barry v. U.S. Capitol Guide Bd., 636 F. Supp. 2d 95, 107 (D.D.C. 2009).

Sculimbrene v. Reno

158 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 16, 2001

See Spagnola v. … Circuit cases which apply the principle set forth in Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976), that “a precisely drawn, detailed statute preempts more general remedies.”

Petties v. District of Columbia

888 F. Supp. 165 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 1995

Board of Education, 348 F.Supp. 866, 876 (D.D.C.1972), and Cox v. Brown, 498 F.Supp. 823, 830 (D.D.C.1980). … V.

Holmes v. PHI Service Co.

437 F. Supp. 2d 110 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2006

Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M St., L.L.C., 257 F.Supp.2d 175, 177 (D.D.C.2003) (citations omitted). B. … As the District of Columbia Circuit observed in Brown v.

Jones v. Panetta

956 F. Supp. 2d 284 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 2013

Miller v. Insulation Contractors, 608 F. … Date: July 30, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Qtaish v. Bronzeville Park Nursing and Living Center

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 19, 2023

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Mills v. Winter

540 F. Supp. 2d 178 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2008

Kowal v. MCI Commc’ns Corp., 16 F.3d 1271, 1276 (D.C.Cir.1994); see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002); Sparrow v. United Air Lines, Inc., 216 *183 F.3d 1111, 1113 (D.C.Cir.2000). … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999).

Petty v. Wainwright

917 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2013

to the Board that the revocation hearing was tainted”); Roper v. … See Crawford v. Barry, No. 95-7073, 1996 WL 734096 , at *1 (D.C.Cir. Nov. 8, 1996) (per curiam) (finding that Parole Board properly relied on criminal charge of which appellant had been acquitted).

Miller v. Colvin

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2016

Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 705-706 (D.C. Cir. 1986). … Brown, 794 F.2d at 706.

Wharf, Inc. v. District of Columbia

232 F. Supp. 3d 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 12, 2017

v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)); accord Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007) (per curiam). … v.

Poole v. United States Government printing/publishing office/agency

258 F. Supp. 3d 193 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2017

See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015); Equal Emp’t Opportunity Comm’n v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial Sch., 117 F.3d 621, 624 (D.C. Cir. 1997); Pernice v. … Niskey, 2017 WL 2485304, at *5 (quoting Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.

Newport Aeronautical Sales v. Department of the Air Force

660 F. Supp. 2d 60 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 2009

In that case, the Railroad Retirement Board denied a FOIA request pursuant to Section 12(d) of the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (RUIA), 45 U.S.C. § 351 et seq, which read: Information obtained by the Board in connection … (ii) the Board may disclose such information in cases in which the Board finds *66 that such disclosure is clearly in furtherance of the interest of the employee or his estate;....

United States v. Dunlap

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 2, 2020

Grupo Dataflux v. … United States v. Brown, No. 92-cr- 345, ECF No. 93, at 10 (D.D.C. July 2, 2020).

McNeil v. District of Columbia

217 F. Supp. 3d 107 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 2016

Education Campus (“Browne”) for the remainder of the 2011–2012 school year, where he continued to struggle. … See Bd. of Educ. v.

Sicinska v. Google

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2020

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr. Corp., 71 F.

Tequila Centinela, S.A. v. Bacardi & Co.

247 F.R.D. 198 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 2008

Diederich v. Dep’t of the Army, 132 F.R.D. 614, 621 (S.D.N.Y.1990). … During opposition proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the "Board"), Centinela’s counsel moved for leave to narrow the application’s identification of goods. (Pl.’s Opp'n at 9.)

Center on Corporate Responsibility, Inc. v. Shultz

368 F. Supp. 863 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 12, 1973

Roger V. … United States v.

Ward v. Shinseki

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 19, 2012

Woodruff v. LaHood, 777 F. … See, e.g., Steffes v.

Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse

737 F. Supp. 1202 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 1990

with the aid of the Board’s Admissions Committee. … See Katradis v. Dav-El of Washington, D.C., 846 F.2d 1482, 1485 (D.C.Cir.1988); Simpson v. Federal Mine Safety & Health Review Commission, 842 F.2d 453, 462 (D.C.Cir.1988); Dashnaw v.

Hall v. Department of Homeland Security

219 F. Supp. 3d 112 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2016

within the Board’s applicable rules for such proceedings. … See Eash v.