Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
5.11s
United States v. Aguilar-Vargas
District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2016
Thompson, 682 F.3d 285, 289 (3d Cir. 2010); United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 338 (4th Cir. 2011); United States v. Smith, 658 F.3d 608, 611 (6th Cir. 2011); United States v. … Dixon, 387 F.3d 356, 359 (7th Cir. 2012); United States v. Browne, 698 F.3d 1042, 1045 (8th Cir. 2012); United States v. Austin, 676 F.3d 924, 927 (9th Cir. 2012); United States v.
Cited 0 timesPublished139 F. Supp. 3d 120 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 2015
Communist Party of U.S. v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S.1, 83, 81 S.Ct. 1357 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625 (1961). … Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S, 257, 259, 109 S.Ct. 2909 , 106 L.Ed.2d 219 (1989).
Cited 29 timesPublishedKline v. Republic of El Salvador
603 F. Supp. 1313 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 1985
Laswell v. Brown, 683 F.2d 261, 267-68 (8th Cir.1982); Birnbaum v. United States, 588 F.2d 319, 327-28 (2d Cir.1978). … Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748 , 96 S.Ct. 1817 , 48 L.Ed.2d 346 (1976). 13 . Lamont v.
Cited 32 timesPublished440 F. Supp. 782 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 1977
Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138 , 93 S.Ct. 1241 , 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973). As the Supreme Court held in Camp v. Pitts, supra: . … Camp v. Pitts, supra.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUnited States v. Philip Morris USA
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 2022
_______________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Reynolds Tobacco Company (individually, as successor in interest to Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, and as successor to Lorillard Tobacco Company) (collectively, “defendants”); and ITG Brands, LLC, Commonwealth Brands
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Treasury Employees Union v. Reagan
509 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 1981
To put the proposition another way, the Supreme Court has also recognized in Board of Regents v. … This Circuit quoted Board of Regents v. Roth in Colm v. Vance, 567 F.2d 1125, 1128 (D.C.Cir.1977) and said that something more objectifiable than a sanguine expectation is necessary.
Cited 14 timesPublished504 F. Supp. 108 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1980
Plaintiff relies on Board of Regents v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 577, 92 S.Ct. at 2709 (emphasis supplied).
Cited 3 timesPublishedSalazar v. District of Columbia
30 F. Supp. 3d 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2014
V. … V. v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., 743 F.2d 932, 941 (D.C. Cir. 1984).
Cited 2 timesPublishedEqual Employment Opportunity Commission v. District of Columbia, Department of Human Services
729 F. Supp. 907 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 1990
In Trans World Airlines v. … Many dentists with specialty practices never complete the board certification process, but rather remain “board eligible.” Indeed, the testimony at trial indicated that Dr.
Cited 4 timesPublished448 F. Supp. 487 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 1978
See Mobil Oil Corporation v. Dann, 421 F.Supp. 995 (D.D.C.1976). … Nor does Eckey v. Watson, 106 U.S.App. D. C. 16, 268 F.2d 891 (1959) compel a different conclusion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHicks v. Dc Water & Sewer Authority
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2025
Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … Supp. 3d 462, 464 (D.D.C. 2017); Brown, 789 F.3d at 152. Ultimately, though, a pro se plaintiff still must plead a plausible claim to avoid dis- missal. See Odutola v. Branch Banking & Tr. Co., 321 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHeard v. Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2017
P. 8(a); see Ashcrofl‘ v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Cira/sky v. C]A, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2023
See United States v. Choi, 818 F. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, Plaintiff’s rambling letter jumps from topic to topic without transition or connection.
Cited 0 timesPublished684 F. Supp. 303 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 1987
or pursuant to standards followed by that board. … Montanye v. Haymes, supra and Meachum v. Fano, supra.
Cited 6 timesPublishedXp Vehicles, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Energy
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2015
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … To the extent that Plaintiffs seek to rely on Navab-Safavi v. Broadcasting Board of Governors, 650 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFreeman v. United States Department of Agriculture
350 F. Supp. 457 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 1972
Defendants should then determine whether implementation of those increases is consistent with the regulations issued by the Pay Board during Phase II. … Hickel, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 176 , 421 F.2d 1111 (1969) and Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass’n v. FPC 104 U.S.App.D.C. 106 , 259 F.2d 921 (1958).
Cited 5 timesPublishedVasquez v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2023
Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 247 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 564A (1977)). … Mot., Ex. 48, ECF No. 175-51 (A post from the message board stating “[r]egional has been complicit from the beginning with this nonsense”).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2020
Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … P. 11 Advisory Committee's Notes to 1993 Amendment; see also Reynolds v. United States Capitol Police Board, 357 F.
Cited 0 timesPublished271 F. Supp. 609 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 1967
Section IX and Section V must be read together. … Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518 , 4 L.Ed. 629 .
Reversed on other grounds by Jeroyd W. Greene v. Howard University, a Corporation, Nathan Hare v. Howard University, a Corporation, 412 F.2d 1128 (1969)Cited 23 timesPublishedMedica Insurance Company v. Becerra
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2025
Id. § 1395x(v)(1)(A). … Org., Inc. v. Azar, 384 F. Supp. 3d 80, 94 (D.D.C. 2019) (“The rules relating to Administrator review of a Board decision . . . are applicable to the maximum extent possible for any nonprovider hearing.”
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna