Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

5.11s

  • United States v. Aguilar-Vargas

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2016

    Thompson, 682 F.3d 285, 289 (3d Cir. 2010); United States v. Brown, 653 F.3d 337, 338 (4th Cir. 2011); United States v. Smith, 658 F.3d 608, 611 (6th Cir. 2011); United States v. … Dixon, 387 F.3d 356, 359 (7th Cir. 2012); United States v. Browne, 698 F.3d 1042, 1045 (8th Cir. 2012); United States v. Austin, 676 F.3d 924, 927 (9th Cir. 2012); United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Rodgers, M.H.A.

    139 F. Supp. 3d 120 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 2015

    Communist Party of U.S. v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S.1, 83, 81 S.Ct. 1357 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625 (1961). … Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc., 492 U.S, 257, 259, 109 S.Ct. 2909 , 106 L.Ed.2d 219 (1989).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Kline v. Republic of El Salvador

    603 F. Supp. 1313 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 1985

    Laswell v. Brown, 683 F.2d 261, 267-68 (8th Cir.1982); Birnbaum v. United States, 588 F.2d 319, 327-28 (2d Cir.1978). … Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 U.S. 748 , 96 S.Ct. 1817 , 48 L.Ed.2d 346 (1976). 13 . Lamont v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Central State Bank v. Bloom

    440 F. Supp. 782 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 1977

    Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. 138 , 93 S.Ct. 1241 , 36 L.Ed.2d 106 (1973). As the Supreme Court held in Camp v. Pitts, supra: . … Camp v. Pitts, supra.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Philip Morris USA

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 2022

    _______________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Reynolds Tobacco Company (individually, as successor in interest to Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, and as successor to Lorillard Tobacco Company) (collectively, “defendants”); and ITG Brands, LLC, Commonwealth Brands

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Treasury Employees Union v. Reagan

    509 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 1981

    To put the proposition another way, the Supreme Court has also recognized in Board of Regents v. … This Circuit quoted Board of Regents v. Roth in Colm v. Vance, 567 F.2d 1125, 1128 (D.C.Cir.1977) and said that something more objectifiable than a sanguine expectation is necessary.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Matthews v. Hesburgh

    504 F. Supp. 108 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1980

    Plaintiff relies on Board of Regents v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 577, 92 S.Ct. at 2709 (emphasis supplied).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Salazar v. District of Columbia

    30 F. Supp. 3d 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2014

    V. … V. v. Chicago Title Ins. Co., 743 F.2d 932, 941 (D.C. Cir. 1984).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. District of Columbia, Department of Human Services

    729 F. Supp. 907 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 1990

    In Trans World Airlines v. … Many dentists with specialty practices never complete the board certification process, but rather remain “board eligible.” Indeed, the testimony at trial indicated that Dr.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mobil Oil Corp. v. Dann

    448 F. Supp. 487 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 1978

    See Mobil Oil Corporation v. Dann, 421 F.Supp. 995 (D.D.C.1976). … Nor does Eckey v. Watson, 106 U.S.App. D. C. 16, 268 F.2d 891 (1959) compel a different conclusion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hicks v. Dc Water & Sewer Authority

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2025

    Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015). … Supp. 3d 462, 464 (D.D.C. 2017); Brown, 789 F.3d at 152. Ultimately, though, a pro se plaintiff still must plead a plausible claim to avoid dis- missal. See Odutola v. Branch Banking & Tr. Co., 321 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Heard v. Department of Justice

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2017

    P. 8(a); see Ashcrofl‘ v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Cira/sky v. C]A, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jordan v. Ormond

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2023

    See United States v. Choi, 818 F. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Here, Plaintiff’s rambling letter jumps from topic to topic without transition or connection.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Pitts v. Meese

    684 F. Supp. 303 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 1987

    or pursuant to standards followed by that board. … Montanye v. Haymes, supra and Meachum v. Fano, supra.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Xp Vehicles, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Energy

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2015

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … To the extent that Plaintiffs seek to rely on Navab-Safavi v. Broadcasting Board of Governors, 650 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Freeman v. United States Department of Agriculture

    350 F. Supp. 457 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 1972

    Defendants should then determine whether implementation of those increases is consistent with the regulations issued by the Pay Board during Phase II. … Hickel, 137 U.S.App.D.C. 176 , 421 F.2d 1111 (1969) and Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass’n v. FPC 104 U.S.App.D.C. 106 , 259 F.2d 921 (1958).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Vasquez v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2023

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 247 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing RESTATEMENT (SECOND) OF TORTS § 564A (1977)). … Mot., Ex. 48, ECF No. 175-51 (A post from the message board stating “[r]egional has been complicit from the beginning with this nonsense”).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Romarm S.A.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2020

    Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … P. 11 Advisory Committee's Notes to 1993 Amendment; see also Reynolds v. United States Capitol Police Board, 357 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Greene v. Howard University

    271 F. Supp. 609 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 1967

    Section IX and Section V must be read together. … Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward, 4 Wheat. 518 , 4 L.Ed. 629 .

    Reversed on other grounds by Jeroyd W. Greene v. Howard University, a Corporation, Nathan Hare v. Howard University, a Corporation, 412 F.2d 1128 (1969)Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Medica Insurance Company v. Becerra

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2025

    Id. § 1395x(v)(1)(A). … Org., Inc. v. Azar, 384 F. Supp. 3d 80, 94 (D.D.C. 2019) (“The rules relating to Administrator review of a Board decision . . . are applicable to the maximum extent possible for any nonprovider hearing.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.