Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.32s
Federal Trade Commission v. Coca-Cola Co.
641 F. Supp. 1128 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 1986
Shoe Co. v. … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 315 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1518 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962).
Vacated by Federal Trade Commission v. Coca-Cola Company, 829 F.2d 191 (1987)Cited 11 timesPublishedEl Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood Health Center, Inc. v. Department of Health & Human Services
300 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2004
See Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. … Bracco Diagnostics, Inc. v.
Cited 9 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 2022
Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … Cir. 1992); Panko v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMoore v. U.S. Justice Department
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 24, 2017
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2026
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Jefferies v. District of Columbia, 916 F. Supp. 2d 42, 44 (D.D.C. 2013) (quoting Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 331 (D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFirst National Bank & Trust Co. v. National Credit Union Administration
772 F. Supp. 609 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 9, 1991
Each credit union is managed by a board of directors elected annually by and from the members, and no member of the board receives any compensation for these services. § 1761. … In Branch Bank & Trust Co. v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedEstate of Gaither v. District of Columbia
833 F. Supp. 2d 110 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 2011
Binson Dep. at 31-36; Brown Dep. at 93-94. … at 31-36; Brown Dep. at 93-94.
Cited 3 timesPublishedInterco, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission
490 F. Supp. 39 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 1979
As indicated above, such denial was consistent with the Supreme Court’s decision in Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra at 319 n. 49.
Cited 8 timesPublished587 F. Supp. 2d 166 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 21, 2008
The State Department failed to act within 90 days, and Shea complained to the Foreign Service Grievance Board. The Foreign Service Grievance Board dismissed his complaint, Def. … Circuit understood and applied it in Shea v. Rice.” Pl. MSJ at 25. The Shea v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedBurton v. District of Columbia
277 F.R.D. 224 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 2011
Daskalea v. Wash. Humane Soc., 275 F.R.D. 346, 355 (D.D.C. 2011) (citing Richards v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 453 F.3d 525, 529 (D.C. Cir. 2006)). … See Moore v.
Cited 13 timesPublished346 F. Supp. 1005 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 1972
Monsanto Co. v. Kamp, 269 F.Supp. 818, 822, 823 (D.D.C.1967); Polaroid Corporation v. Horner, 197 F.Supp. 950, 954 (D.D.C. 1961); Radio Corporation of America v. … Vogel v. Jones, Appeal Nos. 71-1738 and 71-1739 (3rd Cir., August 25, 1971). ** In addition to Vogel v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 2017
See Hal'nes v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Calz'fano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 2022
(quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999), overruled by Chambers v. Dist. of Columbia, 35 F.4th 870 (D.C. … See Brown, 199 F.3d at 458.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2025
Tanner-Brown v. Haaland, 105 F.4th 437, 443 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (subject matter jurisdiction); Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (failure to state a claim). … P. 8(a)(1) (requiring a plaintiff to plead “a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court’s jurisdiction”); Allen v. Brown, 320 F. Supp. 3d 16, 32 (D.D.C. 2018) (collecting cases). 6 C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedVang v. Social Security Administration
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2023
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedHealthy Futures of Texas v. Department of Health and Human Services
District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2018
The agency made this decision indiscriminately (i.e., the decision applied across the board, with respect to all of the TPPP awards for five-year projects that HHS had issued in 2015), and as Plaintiffs have pointed out … DATE: June 1, 2018 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Cited 0 timesPublishedWatts v. Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 2, 2017
See Haz`nes v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Evenpro se litigants, however, must comply with the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff demands legal representation and a trial, see Cor`npl. at l, but the underlying basis of her claim(s) is unclear.
Cited 0 timesPublishedZandford v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.
30 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 20, 1998
Butz v. … Gray v.
Cited 8 timesPublishedKissi v. Department of Justice
District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 2026
v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 499 (D.D.C. 1977). * * * For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s requests for leave to file, ECF 26; ECF 28, are DENIED.
Cited 0 timesPublished201 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2002
See, e.g., Hebert v. Exxon Corp., 953 F.2d 936 , 938 *44 (5th Cir.1992) (indicating that application of Rule 62(d) turns on whether the judgment is monetary or non-monetary); Donovan v. … See Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Ass’n v. Federal Power Comm’n, 259 F.2d 921, 925 (D.C.Cir.1958) (denying stay of an administrative order); Washington Metro. Area Transit Comm’n v.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna