Case law

Irvin, Sr. v. Aftermath Entertainment

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 2017

.~ v / , . … Brown v. Calz`fano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977).

Ruther v. Sequential Group Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2017

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … v.

Burton v. District of Columbia

277 F.R.D. 224 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 23, 2011

Daskalea v. Wash. Humane Soc., 275 F.R.D. 346, 355 (D.D.C. 2011) (citing Richards v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 453 F.3d 525, 529 (D.C. Cir. 2006)). … See Moore v.

Breakman v. AOL LLC

545 F. Supp. 2d 96 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 17, 2008

See Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets, 313 U.S. 100, 107-09 , 61 S.Ct. 868 , 85 L.Ed. *101 1214 (1941); Bhagwanani, 355 F.Supp.2d at 297 ; Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M Street LLC, 257 F.Supp.2d 175, 177 (D.D.C.2003). … Adolph Coors Co. v. Truck Ins. Exchange, 2005 WL 486580 , at *2 (D.D.C. Feb.28, 2005) (citing Johnson-Brown, 257 F.Supp.2d at 178 , and Carden v.

Moore v. U.S. Justice Department

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 24, 2017

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009). … Brown v. Calzfano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Fanning v. Bell

82 F. Supp. 3d 60 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 2015

Co., Ltd. v. … See Strunk v. Strunk, 445 S.W.2d 145, 148 (Ky.

Hohri v. United States

586 F. Supp. 769 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 1984

The cases cited by plaintiffs, Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134 , 94 S.Ct. 1633 , 40 L.Ed.2d 15 (1974), and Board of Regents v. … Compare Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), with Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 , 16 S.Ct. 1138 , 41 L.Ed. 256 (1896); Erie Railroad Co. v.

Daniels v. Shulkin

District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2018

WPA claims can be brought to a district court only after the Office of Special Counsel (“OSC”) and the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) find no agency wrongdoing. See Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 142 (D.C. … Supp. 3d 126, 133–34 (D.D.C. 2015); see Brown v. Gen. Servs.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Levy

706 F. Supp. 61 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 2, 1989

.”); Anderson v. … Ernst & Ernst v.

Robinson v. Obama

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 2016

Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994). The D.C. … See, e.g., Custis v. CIA, 118 F.

Vang v. Social Security Administration

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2023

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Critical Mass Energy Project v. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

644 F. Supp. 344 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 1986

Information is said to be “confidential” if it is customarily not *347 released to the public by the person from whom the government obtains it, Board of Trade v. … National Parks and Conservation Association v.

Bayside Community Hospital v. Leavitt

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2009

Hosp. v. … Cement Kiln Recycling Coal. v. EPA, 493 F.3d 207, 223 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (quoting FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 132 (2000)).

Kim v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 6, 2023

Saad v. SEC, 873 F.3d 297, 299 (D.C. Cir. 2017); Dkt. 2-1 ¶ 62. Its board has twenty-two directors selected by FINRA’s members. … and -removable board and officers governing its state action.”

Hurd v. District of Columbia

146 F. Supp. 3d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 19, 2015

See Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 25 F.Supp.3d 144, 148 (D.D.C.2014); see also Cooper v. Fed. … officers, without their first seeking the Board’s approval and getting the release order vacated.

Hines v. H and R Block

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 1, 2017

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 ( 1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Calz'fano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs single claim is that defendant “issued a tax return to the plaintiff in violation of the Revenue Act of186l and/or applicable US tax laws.” Compl. at 3.

Zandford v. National Ass'n of Securities Dealers, Inc.

30 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 20, 1998

Butz v. … Gray v.

Estate of Gaither v. District of Columbia

833 F. Supp. 2d 110 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 2011

Binson Dep. at 31-36; Brown Dep. at 93-94. … at 31-36; Brown Dep. at 93-94.

Martin v. Leonhart

717 F. Supp. 2d 92 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 2010

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). A complaint must present “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face” and “above the speculative level.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v. … See, e.g., McKinney v.

Springs v. Braithwaite

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 2023

Solid Waste Activities Grp. v. EPA, 901 F.3d 414, 436 (D.C. Cir. 2018) (quoting Limnia, Inc. v. Dep’t of Energy, 857 F.3d 379, 386 (D.C. Cir. 2017)). … (quoting Ethyl Corp. v. Browner, 989 F.2d 522, 524 (D.C. Cir. 1993)).