Case law

Mil-Ka-Ko Research & Development Corp. v. Office of Economic Opportunity

352 F. Supp. 169 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 1972

Board of Education, 350 U.S. 551 , 76 S.Ct. 637 , 100 L.Ed. 692 (1956); as do staff members dismissed during the term of their employment contracts, Wieman v. … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Local 82, Service Employees International Union v. Pritchard Industries, Inc.

827 F. Supp. 35 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 1993

See Smith v. … .”); Mack Trucks, Inc. v.

Doyle v. Tomlinson

265 F. 461 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 1920

For the reasons announced in the preceding case, Brown v. Tomlinson (No. 1254) 49 App. D. C. —, 265 Fed. 460 , we affirm he decision of the Patent Office. Affirmed.

Butler v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 2, 2024

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). III. ANALYSIS A. … While a plaintiff need not plead each element of a prima facie case of discrimination to survive a motion for judgment on the pleadings, see Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1023 (D.C.

Laureatus Group, LLC v. United States Department of the Treasury

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 2023

Likewise, then-Director of the Federal Reserve Board’s Management Division Richard A. … Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007) (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47 (1957)). A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) “tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint.” Browning v.

Rice v. District of Columbia

626 F. Supp. 2d 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 17, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). “[A] complaint needs some information about the circumstances giving rise to the claims.” Aktieselskabet AF 21. Nov. 2001 v. … Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241 , 1245 n. 2 (D.C.1986). Moreover, malicious prosecutions claims can only be brought against persons who have wrongfully caused charges to be filed. Pitt v.

Stark III v. Swift

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 4, 2019

Brown, Laxalt, and List are residents of Nevada, Brown Affidavit, 14-2; Laxalt Affidavit, ECF No. 16-2; List Affidavit, ECF No. 16-3; Keller is a resident of Iowa, Keller Affidavit, ECF No. 15-2; and Puetz is a resident … V.

McKesson Corp. v. Islamic Republic of Iran

752 F. Supp. 2d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 19, 2010

McKesson V, 539 F.3d at 491. … See LaShawn A. v.

D. C. Federation of Civic Associations, Inc. v. Volpe

316 F. Supp. 754 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 1970

V, 1970). … Chief Judge Brown, in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v.

Hickman v. Federal Elections Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 26, 2009

ruptcy Courts Derian Douglas Hickman, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Wagner v. United States Solicitor General

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 4, 2023

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973); see also Sargeant v. Dixon, 130 F.3d 1067, 1069 (D.C. Cir. 1997); Powell v. Katzenbach, 359 F.2d 234, 234–35 (D.C.

Mallard v. Claytor

471 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 1978

V. SELECTION OF WILLIAM KEHRES AS HIGHEST QUALIFIED 1. By letter dated June 12, 1975, Mr. … See Albemarle Paper Company v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405, 425 , 95 S.Ct. 2362 , 45 L.Ed.2d 280 (1975).

Ruther v. Rust

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 2017

P. 8(a); see Ashcroj} v. ]qbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Cz`ralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … v.

Becton v. Pena

946 F. Supp. 84 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 1996

Plaintiff is correct that Hilliard v. U.S. Postal Service, 814 F.2d 325 (6th Cir.1987), and King v. … Nunnally v.

Hoch v. Eli Lilly and Company

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 10, 2010

Breakman v. AOL LLC, 545 F. Supp. 2d 96, 102 (D.D.C. 2008). GSK LLC’s only member is GSK Holdings, a Delaware corporation. … Hertz Corp. v. Friena’, l30 S. Ct. 1181 (2010).

Bender v. Jordan

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 20, 2010

Lucas v. Spellings, 408 F. Supp. 2d 8, 10 (D.D.C. 2006) (citations omitted); Independence Federal Savings Bank v. Bender, 230 F.R.D. 11, 17 (D.D.C. 2005) (citing Gurary v. … Advisory Committee Note (1993) (subdivisions (b) and (c)); see Reynolds v. The U.S. Capitol Police Board, 357 F.

Jackson v. Kennedy

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2026

See Carell v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 131 F. App’x 296, 299 (Fed. Cir. 2005) (“[T]he Privacy Act also does not provide a basis for [Merit Systems Protection] Board jurisdiction. . . . … See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Gun Owners of America, Inc v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 2025

In Renegotiation Board v. … True, as the Supreme Court explained in Renegotiation Board v.

Hatcher v. Herring

304 F. Supp. 507 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 1969

Defendants applied to the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board to issue a liquor license to the Red Door Lounge, Inc. for use in the business acquired from Commercial Enterprises, Inc. … Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. Federal Power Commission, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 106 , 110, 259 F.2d 921 , 925 (1958); see also A Quaker Action Group v. Hickel, U.S.App.D.C. (June 24, 1969).

McMillan v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 26, 2019

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). A complaint must contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,” Fed. R. Civ. … He goes on to state that WMATA’s Board of Directors has been “afforded the opportunity to inquire into and deny the law on which the entitlement to make the claim is based.” Id. To support his statements, Mr.