Case law

Young v. American Legion

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 26, 2016

sabotage[]" his claim for medical benefits by claiming that plaintiff "filed hi[s] medical claims to[o] late, that he had excessive relationships and sex with the 14 doctors who supported his medical [claim]," and "told [the Board … See West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).

Butera v. District of Columbia

83 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 1999

Valentine” Brown. … Valentine” Brown; and, 2) the Court's finding (uncontested) that Defense Counsel wrote the Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(1) expert report for Mr. Brown. (Ord., 8/17/99.) 13 . The Court has discussed at length the issue of Mr.

Freedom Watch, Inc. v. Department of State

925 F. Supp. 2d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2013

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System The Federal Reserve Board of Governors (“FRB”) received the FOIA request on January 23, 2012, and began attempting to reach Freedom Watch by telephone on February … See Stern v. FBI, 737 F.2d 84, 88 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Like the Defendant Agencies, Freedom Watch cites Dale v.

Ruther v. Russel Johns Associates LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 2018

Even pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. .]arrell v. Tz`sch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Aguilar v. United States

183 F. Supp. 598 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 8, 1960

Ct. 640 , 83 L.Ed. 1063 ; and see Prado Del Castillo v. United States, 9 Cir., 1959, 272 F.2d 326, 330 ; Bono v. United States, 2 Cir., 1940, 113 F.2d 724, 725 . . … United States v. Bollman, 8 Cir., 1934, 73 F.2d 133, 135 ; Rosario v. *600 United States, 1939, 70 App.D.C. 323 , 106 F.2d 844 ; De Pusana v. United States, D.C.D.C.1958, 164 F.Supp. 672 ; but see also Dyer v.

Lockwood v. Family

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 2017

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply with the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. l977). The Court has reviewed the plaintiffs complaint and finds that it fails to meet the stande set forth in Rule 8(a).

Schwarz v. United States Department of Treasury

131 F. Supp. 2d 142 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 2000

Fed.R.Civ.P.12(b)(6); Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d 1271, 1276 (D.C.Cir.1994); Thomas v. … See Hunt v. CIA, 981 F.2d 1116,1119-20 (9th Cir.1992); Miller v. Casey, 730 F.2d 773, 776 (D.C.Cir.1984); Gardels v. CIA, 689 F.2d 1100, 1103 (D.C.Cir.1982).

National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. U.S. Department of Education

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 24, 2025

But an injunction from this Court would not eliminate the resolution that the School Board passed. … See Arce v.

Leeds v. Quigg

745 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 1990

In NLRB v. … of Patent Appeals and Interferences; (11) Inter partes decisions of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences; (12) decisions of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board; (13) Commissioner’s decisions in trademark matters

Calloway v. Brownlee

366 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2005

.”); Wolfe v. … .”); vnth Bliss v.

Hampton v. Vilsack

760 F. Supp. 2d 38 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2011

On May 4, 2006, USDA notified the Foreign Service Grievance Board (“FSGB”) that it intended to separate plaintiff for cause. (Compl. ¶ 39; Pl.’s Decl. ¶ 28.) … Solis, 571 F.3d 1313, 1322 (D.C.Cir.2009) (two-and-a-half month lapse between prior protected activity and allegedly materially adverse action insufficient to show a relation between the two); Brown v.

Miller v. Rogers

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2022

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 1  Plaintiff’s complaint, in its entirety, alleges his “music book was stolen by Mr. E. … Bush v. Butler, 521 F. Supp. 2d 63, 71 (D.D.C. 2007) (citing Owen Equip. & Erection Co. v. Kroger, 437 U.S. 365, 373-74 (1978)).

Forsyth Memorial Hospital Inc. v. Sebelius

667 F. Supp. 2d 143 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 5, 2009

Ctr. v. Sebelius, 566 F.3d 368, 376-77 (3d Cir.2009); Robert F. Kennedy Med. Ctr. v. Leavitt, 526 F.3d 557, 562 (9th Cir.2008); Via Christi Reg’l Med. Ctr. v. … See FCC v.

Hamilton v. Paulson

542 F. Supp. 2d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 3, 2008

Approximately ten years later, this Court reached the same conclusion based on similar facts in Brown v. Small, 437 F.Supp.2d 125 (D.D.C.2006) (Walton, J.). … Brown, 437 F.Supp.2d at 135 n. 10 (internal quotation and citation omitted).

Farouki v. Petra International Banking Corporation

968 F. Supp. 2d 216 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 2013

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter . . . to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” … Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 (internal quotations omitted). 2.

In Re Harman International Industries, Inc. Securities Litigation

27 F. Supp. 3d 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 2014

; Dinesh Paliwal, Harman’s President, CEO, and Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors from July 1, 2007, through the end of the Class Period; Kevin Brown, Harman’s Executive Vice President and CFO throughout the Class … v. September 27, 2007, Conference Call During Harman’s September 27, 2007, investor conference call, Harman CFO Kevin Brown made two forward-looking statements that Plaintiffs identify as misrepresentations.

Breen v. Peters

474 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 2007

Beins v. … Defendants cite Carey v.

Ruther v. State of Michigan

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 4, 2017

See Haz`nes v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply With the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Jordan v. Gant

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2020

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … See Compl. ¶ V (Certification and Closing).

Eley v. Stadium Group, LLC

236 F. Supp. 3d 59 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2017

Ashraf-Hassan v. Embassy of France, 189 F. … DATE: February 17, 2017 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge