Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
4.89s
Canadian Javelin, Ltd. v. Lawler, Kent & Eisenberg
478 F. Supp. 448 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 15, 1979
Special Counsel shall notify the Commission and Javelin’s Board of Directors in any respect in which he believes the Judgment is not being carried out and advise the Board as to the steps necessary to cure such failure. … See Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974); Briggs v. Goodwin, supra, 186 U.S.App.D.C. at 189-190 , 569 F.2d at 20-22 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 2018
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). This complaint contains no factual allegations Whatsoever.
Cited 0 timesPublishedChavez v. Verizon Communications Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2025
Supp. 2d at 36 (quoting Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M St. LLC, 257 F. Supp. 2d 175, 177 (D.D.C. 2003)). III. … (quoting Johnson-Brown, 257 F. Supp. 2d at 177), the uncertainty as to whether Mr. Odom was properly served militates in favor of remand. B.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn Re Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'n Securities
725 F. Supp. 2d 169 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2010
Co. v. … The other cases were originally captioned as Middleton v. Raines (Civ. No. 07-1221), Arthur v. Mudd (Civ. No. 07-2130), and Agnes v. Raines (Civ. No. 08-1093).
Reversed on other grounds by Kellmer ex rel. Fannie Mae v. Raines, 674 F.3d 848 (2012)Cited 7 timesPublishedHalcomb v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-Arms
563 F. Supp. 2d 228 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 2008
Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … Brown, 199 F.3d at 456 .
Cited 32 timesPublishedHoneywell, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission
582 F. Supp. 1072 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 1984
See Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., 415 U.S. 1, 24 , 94 S.Ct. 1028, 1040 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974). Moreover, defendant-intervenors may still receive all the requested material. D. … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 315 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1724 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). 4 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2009
See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,520 (1972). Nonetheless,pro se plaintiffs must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedPeterson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
330 F. Supp. 424 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 1971
II Plaintiff relies principally on Pacific National Insurance Company v. … Brown v. United States, 426 F.2d 355, 357 , 192 Ct.Cl. 203 (1970) and cases cited therein. 4 .
Cited 1 timesPublishedAmerican Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service
422 F. Supp. 2d 240 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 23, 2006
Four days after writing to the arbitrator to suggest that the award must be withdrawn, USPS filed a unit clarification petition before the Regional Director of the National 'Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”), seeking … USPS appealed the dismissal to the Board itself. On December 24, 2003, the Board granted review, stating that the case “raises substantial issues warranting review.” Def.’s Mot. (Civ. No. 04-1404), Ex. 8.
Cited 17 timesPublishedTavoulareas v. Washington Post Co.
567 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 2, 1983
In Garrison v. … He told Tyler that the Mobil board of directors consistently reviewed the relationship between Mobil and Atlas and that the board was completely satisfied with all aspects of it.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2009
Corp. v. Meyer, 510 U.S. at 478; Zakiya v. United States, 267 F. Supp. 2d 47,56 (D.D.C. 2003). … . §§ 241, 242, 245 because no private right of action exists under those statutes); Brown v. Flying J, Inc., No. 1:08-cv-059, 2009 WL 2516202, at *4 (D.N.D.
Cited 0 timesPublished55 F.2d 745 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 1932
Blitz v. United States, 153 U. S. 308 , 14 S. Ct. 924 , 38 L. Ed. 725 ; Arnstein v. United States, 54 App. D. C. 199, 296 E. 946, cert. den. 264 U. S. 595 , 44 S. Ct. 454 , 68 L. Ed. 867 . … Hardy v. Wise, 5 App. D. C. 108; Raub v. Carpenter, 17 App. D. C. 505; Id., 187 U. S. 159, 23 S. Ct. 72 , 47 L. Ed. 119 ; Branscum v. State, 134 Ark. 66 , 203 S. W. 13 ; State v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2009
Brown v. Barnhart, 370 F. Supp. 2d 286, 288 (D.D.C. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Jackson v. Barnhart, 271 F. Supp. 2d 30, 34 (D.D.C. 2002)). … See Brown, 370 F.
Cited 0 timesPublished814 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 16, 1993
Engkvist became Telco’s Chairman of the Board of Directors and Mr. Selig became a member of that Board. … Corp., 543 F.2d 894, 897 (D.C.Cir.1976); In re Economou, 645 F.Supp. 1055, 1057 (S.D.N.Y.1986), aff'd in relevant part and dismissed in part sub nom., SEC v. American Board of Trade, Inc. 830 F.2d 431 (2d Cir.1987).
Cited 3 timesPublishedOgugua v. Not-For-Profit Hospital Corp. Dba United Medical Center
217 F. Supp. 3d 76 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 8, 2016
Brown v. United States, 742 F.2d 1498, 1509–10 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (en banc); Jaiyeola v. District of Columbia, 40 A.3d 356, 370 & n.65 (D.C. 2012). Thus, Defendant’s first contention is without merit. … FDIC v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 2022
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedInternational Center for Technology Assessment v. Thompson
421 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2006
Warren v. Dist. of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39 ; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .
Cited 13 timesPublishedDistrict of Columbia v. Ramirez
377 F. Supp. 2d 63 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2005
See id. at 9-10 (citing Fick v. Sioux Falls Sch. Dist., 337 F.3d 968 (8th Cir.2003); Timothy H. v. Cedar Rapids Cmty. Sch. Dist., 178 F.3d 968 (8th Cir.1999)). … Plaintiff argues that the hearing officer relied on a Rhode Island case, Hurry v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedAir Line Pilots Ass'n v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
729 F. Supp. 888 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 1989
Board of Adjustment decisions are binding and final, subject to review only on specific, narrow grounds. 45 U.S.C. § 153 First (q). See Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. … Pan American World Airways, Inc., 716 F.Supp. 726 (E.D.N.Y.1989); another has leaned against it, USAir, Inc. v. National Mediation Board, 711 F.Supp. 285 (E.D.Va.1989); while another has leaned toward it.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Nov 10, 2009
See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). Heightened Pleading Requirements under the PLSA. … See Lorman v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna