Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

4.89s

  • Canadian Javelin, Ltd. v. Lawler, Kent & Eisenberg

    478 F. Supp. 448 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 15, 1979

    Special Counsel shall notify the Commission and Javelin’s Board of Directors in any respect in which he believes the Judgment is not being carried out and advise the Board as to the steps necessary to cure such failure. … See Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 U.S. 232 94 S.Ct. 1683 , 40 L.Ed.2d 90 (1974); Briggs v. Goodwin, supra, 186 U.S.App.D.C. at 189-190 , 569 F.2d at 20-22 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Murray v. Johnson

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 2018

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). This complaint contains no factual allegations Whatsoever.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chavez v. Verizon Communications Inc.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2025

    Supp. 2d at 36 (quoting Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M St. LLC, 257 F. Supp. 2d 175, 177 (D.D.C. 2003)). III. … (quoting Johnson-Brown, 257 F. Supp. 2d at 177), the uncertainty as to whether Mr. Odom was properly served militates in favor of remand. B.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Federal Nat. Mortg. Ass'n Securities

    725 F. Supp. 2d 169 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2010

    Co. v. … The other cases were originally captioned as Middleton v. Raines (Civ. No. 07-1221), Arthur v. Mudd (Civ. No. 07-2130), and Agnes v. Raines (Civ. No. 08-1093).

    Reversed on other grounds by Kellmer ex rel. Fannie Mae v. Raines, 674 F.3d 848 (2012)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Halcomb v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-Arms

    563 F. Supp. 2d 228 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 2008

    Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … Brown, 199 F.3d at 456 .

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Honeywell, Inc. v. Consumer Product Safety Commission

    582 F. Supp. 1072 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 1984

    See Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co., 415 U.S. 1, 24 , 94 S.Ct. 1028, 1040 , 39 L.Ed.2d 123 (1974). Moreover, defendant-intervenors may still receive all the requested material. D. … Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 315 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1724 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). 4 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. Bop Fci Loretto

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2009

    See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519,520 (1972). Nonetheless,pro se plaintiffs must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Peterson v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland

    330 F. Supp. 424 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 1971

    II Plaintiff relies principally on Pacific National Insurance Company v. … Brown v. United States, 426 F.2d 355, 357 , 192 Ct.Cl. 203 (1970) and cases cited therein. 4 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • American Postal Workers Union v. United States Postal Service

    422 F. Supp. 2d 240 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 23, 2006

    Four days after writing to the arbitrator to suggest that the award must be withdrawn, USPS filed a unit clarification petition before the Regional Director of the National 'Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “Board”), seeking … USPS appealed the dismissal to the Board itself. On December 24, 2003, the Board granted review, stating that the case “raises substantial issues warranting review.” Def.’s Mot. (Civ. No. 04-1404), Ex. 8.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Tavoulareas v. Washington Post Co.

    567 F. Supp. 651 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 2, 1983

    In Garrison v. … He told Tyler that the Mobil board of directors consistently reviewed the relationship between Mobil and Atlas and that the board was completely satisfied with all aspects of it.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Kissi v. Simmons

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2009

    Corp. v. Meyer, 510 U.S. at 478; Zakiya v. United States, 267 F. Supp. 2d 47,56 (D.D.C. 2003). … . §§ 241, 242, 245 because no private right of action exists under those statutes); Brown v. Flying J, Inc., No. 1:08-cv-059, 2009 WL 2516202, at *4 (D.N.D.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mears v. United States

    55 F.2d 745 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 1932

    Blitz v. United States, 153 U. S. 308 , 14 S. Ct. 924 , 38 L. Ed. 725 ; Arnstein v. United States, 54 App. D. C. 199, 296 E. 946, cert. den. 264 U. S. 595 , 44 S. Ct. 454 , 68 L. Ed. 867 . … Hardy v. Wise, 5 App. D. C. 108; Raub v. Carpenter, 17 App. D. C. 505; Id., 187 U. S. 159, 23 S. Ct. 72 , 47 L. Ed. 119 ; Branscum v. State, 134 Ark. 66 , 203 S. W. 13 ; State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dunham v. Astrue

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2009

    Brown v. Barnhart, 370 F. Supp. 2d 286, 288 (D.D.C. 2005) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Jackson v. Barnhart, 271 F. Supp. 2d 30, 34 (D.D.C. 2002)). … See Brown, 370 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Nynex Corp.

    814 F. Supp. 133 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 16, 1993

    Engkvist became Telco’s Chairman of the Board of Directors and Mr. Selig became a member of that Board. … Corp., 543 F.2d 894, 897 (D.C.Cir.1976); In re Economou, 645 F.Supp. 1055, 1057 (S.D.N.Y.1986), aff'd in relevant part and dismissed in part sub nom., SEC v. American Board of Trade, Inc. 830 F.2d 431 (2d Cir.1987).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ogugua v. Not-For-Profit Hospital Corp. Dba United Medical Center

    217 F. Supp. 3d 76 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 8, 2016

    Brown v. United States, 742 F.2d 1498, 1509–10 (D.C. Cir. 1984) (en banc); Jaiyeola v. District of Columbia, 40 A.3d 356, 370 & n.65 (D.C. 2012). Thus, Defendant’s first contention is without merit. … FDIC v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Irvin v. Facebook

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 2022

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • International Center for Technology Assessment v. Thompson

    421 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2006

    Warren v. Dist. of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Warren, 353 F.3d at 39 ; Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia v. Ramirez

    377 F. Supp. 2d 63 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2005

    See id. at 9-10 (citing Fick v. Sioux Falls Sch. Dist., 337 F.3d 968 (8th Cir.2003); Timothy H. v. Cedar Rapids Cmty. Sch. Dist., 178 F.3d 968 (8th Cir.1999)). … Plaintiff argues that the hearing officer relied on a Rhode Island case, Hurry v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

    729 F. Supp. 888 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 1989

    Board of Adjustment decisions are binding and final, subject to review only on specific, narrow grounds. 45 U.S.C. § 153 First (q). See Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. … Pan American World Airways, Inc., 716 F.Supp. 726 (E.D.N.Y.1989); another has leaned against it, USAir, Inc. v. National Mediation Board, 711 F.Supp. 285 (E.D.Va.1989); while another has leaned toward it.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ross v. Walton

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 10, 2009

    See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). Heightened Pleading Requirements under the PLSA. … See Lorman v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.