Case law

Tarzana Providence Health System v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 2024

Co. v. FDIC, 642 F.3d 1137, 1139 (D.C. Cir. 2011); Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 328 (1976).

Hiligh v. Quintana

District Court, District of Columbia · May 9, 2012

Cir. 2010) (citing Arizona v. California, 530 U.S. 392, 412-13 (2000); Brown v. D.C., 514 F.3d 1279, 1285-86 (D.C. … Dozier v. Ford Motor Co., 702 F. 2d 1189, 1191 (D.C. Cir. 1983); see GAF Corp. v. United States, 818 F.2d 901, 912-13 (D.C.

Anderson v. Reilly

691 F. Supp. 2d 89 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 2010

Parole Board operated under regulations that were codified in 1987 (“1987 Guidelines”). … Fletcher v.

Community Financial Services Association of America, Ltd. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

257 F. Supp. 3d 56 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 5, 2017

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). However, the court does not accept "inferences drawn by plaintiff if such inferences are unsupported by the facts set out in the complaint." Id. … Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. v.

J.Q.R. v. District of Columbia Government

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 17, 2022

Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. 51, 61 (2011) (quoting Board of Comm’rs of Bryan Cty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 (1997)); see also Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. … Connick, 563 U.S. at 61 (2011) (quoting Brown, 520 U.S. at 410). J.Q.R. does not allege facts to establish such liability.

Association of Civilian Technicians, Inc. v. United States

601 F. Supp. 2d 146 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2009

Washington State Air Nat’l Guard, 855 F.2d 1437 , 1442 (9th Cir.1988) (the “Records Board ... has no power to force Washington to reinstate appellants in the Washington Guard”); Jorden v. … NGB, 799 F.2d 99 , 101 n. 5 (3rd Cir.1986) (“the ABCMR, a federal Board, cannot order [plaintiffs] reinstatement to the state Guard”); Williams v.

Conax Florida Corp. v. United States

641 F. Supp. 408 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1986

See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 318 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1725 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979); Megapulse, Inc. v. Lewis, 672 F.2d 959, 964-70 (D.C.Cir.1982). … Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Costle, 657 F.2d at 284 (citing Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. at 142 , 93 S.Ct. at 1244 ).

Freedom Watch, Inc. v. Department of State

925 F. Supp. 2d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2013

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System The Federal Reserve Board of Governors (“FRB”) received the FOIA request on January 23, 2012, and began attempting to reach Freedom Watch by telephone on February … See Stern v. FBI, 737 F.2d 84, 88 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Like the Defendant Agencies, Freedom Watch cites Dale v.

Kurdyukov v. U.C. Coast Guard

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2009

Coast Guard to stop[,] board and search the M/V CHINA BREEZE. (2) All the documents from the Government of Panama authorizing the U.S. … Coast Guard to remain on board the M/V CHINA BREEZE and escort the vessel to a U.S. port to conduct a dockside boarding. 1

Novecon, Ltd. v. Bulgarian-American Enterprise Fund

977 F. Supp. 45 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 1997

Columbia First Bank v. Ferguson, 665 A.2d 650, 656 (D.C.1995) (quoting Mosrie v. Trussell, 467 A.2d 475, 477 (D.C.1983)). … Columbia First Bank, supra, 665 A.2d at 655 (citation omitted) (quoting Moss v. Stockard, 580 A.2d 1011, 1024 (D.C.1990)); see also Collins v.

Santini v. Herman

456 F. Supp. 2d 69 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 2006

Jarrell v. … Attorney removed this case pursuant to Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v.

Menefee v. Rubin

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 30, 2019

S(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Calz'fano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, sues approximately fourteen defendants, including, but not limited to: U.S Congress, the U.S. Senate, the U.S.

Bowden v. Small

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2009

See Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976); Jarrell v. U.S. Postal Serv., 753 F.2d 1088, 1091 (D.C. … ."); see also Brown v. United States, 389 F.3d 1296, 1297 (D.C.

Washington Legal Foundation v. Leavitt

477 F. Supp. 2d 202 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2007

See United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 553 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996). … Ans. # 7 (corporate members who may play a role in selecting board of directors are “not to be confused with the WLF members whose interests WLF is representing in this lawsuit.”).

Bishop v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia · May 23, 2024

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1023 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (cleaned up).

Irvin v. Facebook

District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 2022

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Umude v. American Security Programs, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 10, 2014

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Mr. Umude’s complaint appears to be brought against his former employer challenging the termination of his employment as an armed security officer. … See Fikes v.

United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.

69 F. Supp. 2d 36 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 12, 1999

V. … Albright, recognition must go to the First American Board of Directors, under the wise leadership of the Honorable Charles McC. Mathias, Chairman of the Board and former U.S. Representative and U.S.

Nader v. Air Transport Ass'n of America

426 F. Supp. 1035 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 1977

W., Inc. v. … W., Inc. v.

International Workers Order, Inc. v. Clark

88 F. Supp. 873 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 12, 1949

See generally, Employers Group v. National War Labor Board, 1944, 79 U.S.App. … D.C. 105, 143 F.2d 145 , the language on page 151 being particularly pertinent-: “Appellants’ demand that we annul and enjoin the Board’s order therefore amounts to a demand that we prevent the Board from giving the President