Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

0.50s

  • Forbes v. Brownell

    149 F. Supp. 848 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 1957

    Vidal y Planas v. Landon, supra.; Cf. Ablett v. Brownell, supra. … Ablett v. Brownell, supra.; Vidal y Planas v. Landon, supra; United States ex rel. Meyer v. Day, 2 Cir., 1931, 54 F.2d 336 . The case of Whitty v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Markowicz v. Johnson

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 1, 2016

    the Board. … See Artis v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. Full Sail, LLC

    266 F. Supp. 3d 320 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2017

    (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Demitry v. Rosman

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 2023

    Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). … See, e.g., Brown v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. Feb. 5, 2016) (dismissing a complaint sua sponte for failing to comply with FRCP 8(a)); Hamrick v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Garcia v. Winter

    692 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2010

    While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court in March 2006 issued its decision in Georgia v. … Therefore, all of your arguments concerning the court-martial conviction were disregarded by the Board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Malarkey-Taylor Associates, Inc. v. Cellular Telecommunications Industry Ass'n

    929 F. Supp. 473 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 1996

    Starting in April, 1995, plaintiffs offered subscribers to the WirelessNOW service access to an electronic bulletin board containing wireless industry news, data and information. … Bulletin board services are dial-in computer services which may or may not be linked to the Internet.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bloom v. Harvey

    828 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 6, 2011

    A mixed case complainant may file either a complaint with her agency’s equal employment opportunity office or a “mixed case appeal” directly with the Merit Systems Protection Board. See Butler v. … A month later, she filed a mixed case appeal with the Merit Systems Protection Board, which was dismissed without prejudice as premature because her EEO complaint was still pending. See Bloom v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Rong v. Liaoning Provincial Government

    362 F. Supp. 2d 83 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 3, 2005

    See Land v. … Jungquist v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Springs v. Braithwaite

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2022

    Taylor v. D.C. Water & Sewer Auth., 241 F.R.D. 33, 37 (D.D.C. 2007). … Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, 117 F.3d 571, 575 (D.C. Cir. 1997).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Commerce

    337 F. Supp. 2d 146 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2004

    Brown for the President regarding an October 17-18 visit to China. … For a second example, document 50JJ2558 is a letter responding to legal questions posed by Alma Brown, *175 Secretary Brown’s wife, concerning her and her husband’s attendance at fundrais-ing events. Id. at 247.

    Cited 72 timesPublished
  • Flight Options, LLC v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2018

    Flight Options seeks to vacate an arbitration award of the parties’ System Board of Adjustment (Board), which was issued by Homer La Rue as Impartial Arbitrator and Board Chair from his place of business in Columbia, Maryland … Burger King, 471 U.S. at 474 (citing Int’l Shoe Co. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Garza v. Blinken

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2023

    Specifically, Plaintiff now alleges that Favret said: (1) “[y]ou’re not a brown person” to a colleague who identified as being a brown person, id. ¶ 34; (2) “Can I be your boyfriend” to a human resource employee, id. ¶ … Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53, 68 (2006).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Szymanski v. United States Parole Commission

    870 F. Supp. 377 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 2, 1994

    On August 23, 1991, plaintiff appealed the decision to the National Appeals Board. The Board denied the appeal on December 13, 1991. Plaintiff again applied for parole on April 16, 1993. … See Bergman v. United States, 751 F.2d 314, 317 (10th Cir.1984); see also Tijerina v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Coates v. Field Payroll, LLC

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2017

    OHJDO FRQFOXVLRQV See id see also Browning v. … Brown  86     +HUH SODLQWLII DSSHDUV WR DUJXH WKDW WKH VWDWXWH RI OLPLWDWLRQV VKRXOG EH WROOHG EHFDXVH GHIHQGDQW WRRN VRPH DFWLRQ WR SUHYHQW KHU IURP ILOLQJ D WLPHO\ ODZVXLW See 3O¶V 2SS DW

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Maxberry v. Dejoy

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 13, 2025

    v. … Sinclair v. Kleindienst, 711 F.2d 291, 293 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ehrman v. United States of America

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2012

    See United States v. Jerome Adrian, Crim No. 12-40040 (D.S.D.). … Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972), Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008), the Court clearly lacks the power to grant the relief plaintiff seeks.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lyles v. United States

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 17, 2019

    P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. ClA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, an North1 Carolina inmate, has filed suit against the United States. 'l`he form of the complaint, on its face, fails to comply with Fed. R. Civ. P.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Walker v. District of Columbia

    969 F. Supp. 794 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 23, 1997

    Hall v. Knott County Board of Education, 941 F.2d at 407 ; Miener v. State of Missouri, 800 F.2d at 753; see also Town of Burlington v. … Lunceford v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 745 F.2d 1577, 1580 (D.C.Cir.1984) (quoting Monahan v. Nebraska, 687 F.2d 1164 , 1170 (8th Cir.1982)).

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Swanson v. Howard University, Inc.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 13, 2017

    OHJDO FRQFOXVLRQV See id. see also Browning v. … Chase Home Fin., LLC  ) 6XSS G   ''&   TXRWLQJ Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marsh v. Hollander

    339 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2004

    Crowley v. N. Am. Telecomm. Ass’n, 691 A.2d 1169 , 1172 n. 2 (D.C.1997) (quoting Prins v. … Sys., Ltd., 459 A.2d 1058, 1059 (D.C.1983); Brown v. Collins, 402 F.2d 209, 212 (D.C.Cir.1968); Lewis v. Elliott, 628 F.Supp. 512, 516 (D.D.C.1986).

    Cited 17 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.