Case law

Southern Pacific Co. v. National Mediation Board

223 F. Supp. 951 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 21, 1963

The labor union submitted these matters to the National Mediation Board for decision. Subsequently, the plaintiff railroad submitted the same matters to the National Railroad Adjustment Board. … Whether that decision would be-subject to judicial review under the principles of Leedom v.

Jackson Hospital Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 2011

Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. National Mediation Board

255 F. Supp. 466 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 27, 1966

Switchmen’s Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 . This conclusion, however, is not unlimited. … The validity of the type of ballot used by the National Mediation Board was sustained by the Supreme Court in Brotherhood of Railway and S. S. Clerks etc. v.

North v. District of Columbia Board of Education

471 F. Supp. 136 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 1979

. § 1412 (5)(B); Miils v. Board of Education, supra, 348 F.Supp. at 880 ; Stuart v. Nappi, 443 F.Supp. 1235, 1242 (D.Conn.1978). 5 . For a recent Instance where the D.C. … See, e. g., 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (b)(1)(C); 45 C.F.R. 121a.505; 45 C.F.R. 121a.347; 45 C.F.R. 84.36; Mills v. Board of Education, supra, 348 F.Supp. at 880 .

American President Lines, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Board

112 F. Supp. 346 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 1953

In Federal Communications Commission v. … The doctrine of Alabama Power Co. v. Ickes, supra, is not applicable to proceedings under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Baker DC, LLC v. National Labor Relations Board

102 F. Supp. 3d 194 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 2015

Petroleum Inst. v. … Co. v.

Haralson v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

678 F. Supp. 925 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 18, 1987

By Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed January 13, 1987, this Court granted the motion of plaintiffs which challenged the Bank Board’s classification of assets regulations. Haralson v. … United States v. Aarons, 310 F.2d 341, 348 (2d Cir.1962).

Lee v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 2023

See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 759 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (communications privileged where a primary purpose was for legal advice); United States v. Deloitte LLP, 610 F.3d 129, 138 (D.C. … Glenn v.

National Labor Relations Board Union & National Labor Relations Board Professional Ass'n v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

313 F. App'x 328 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2009

Niles v. United States Capitol Police Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 2023

Chief Dine therefore recommended to the Capitol Police Board that Plaintiff be terminated, and the Board agreed and approved the termination effective August 24, 2015. Id. ¶¶ 154–56. … Brooks v. Grundmann, 748 F.3d 1273, 1276 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (citing Hampton v. Vilsack, 685 F.3d 1096, 1099 (D.C. Cir. 2012)).

Watson v. Federal Parole Board

394 F. Supp. 1291 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 1974

In support of her contention petitioner relies upon Morrisey v. … Fitzgerald v. Sigler, 372 F.Supp. 889 (D.C.D.C. (1974)), Jones v. Johnston, 368 F.Supp. 571 (D.C.D.C. (1974)), and Sutherland v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 366 F.Supp. 270 (D.C.D.C. (1973)).

Jackson Hospital Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

257 F.R.D. 302 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 15, 2009

NLRB v. … E.g., Bauman v. Jacobs Suchard, Inc., 136 14 F.R.D. 460, 461 (N.D. Ill. 1990); Gormin v. Brown-Forman Corp., 133 F.R.D. 50, 53 (M.D. Fla. 1990); see also EEOC v.

Bynum v. United States Capitol Police Board

93 F. Supp. 2d 50 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 2000

See Board of Airport Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles v. … Board of Airport Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles v. Jews for Jesus, Inc., 482 U.S. 569, 576 , 107 S.Ct. 2568 , 96 L.Ed.2d 500 (quoting Lewis v.

Brown v. District of Columbia Housing Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 2017

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) SHUNTAY ANTONIO BROWN, ) … Haase v. Sessions, 835 F.2d 902, 906 (D.C. Cir. 1987).

Mahoney v. United States Capitol Police Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 2023

Capitol Police Board, which is an entity and not an official sued in her official capacity. See 3d Am. Compl. at 1; Papasan v. … See Reply at 14; DeFunis v.

National Labor Relations Board Union & National Labor Relations Board Professional Ass'n v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

313 F. App'x 328 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 2009

Kerkam v. District of Columbia Board of Education

672 F. Supp. 519 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 19, 1987

. § 1983 , the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, and the decision in Mills v. District of Columbia Board of Education, 348 F.Supp. 866 (D.D.C.1972). … In addition, the Court concludes that the District of Columbia Board of Education is not a suable entity and must therefore be dismissed as a party. See Tschanneral v.

Symons v. Chrysler Corp. Loan Guarantee Board

488 F. Supp. 874 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 1980

United States v. Conlon, No, 79-2283, slip op. at 8, (D.C.Cir. April 16, 1980). In Zeigier Coal Co. v. … See United States v. Babcock, 530 F.2d 1051 (D.C.Cir. 1976).

Zemel v. Board of Governors

918 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 29, 1994

Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701, 706 (D.C.Cir.1984). The order of proof is similar to that prescribed in McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. … See Nerenstone v. Barr, 784 F.Supp. 912, 915 (D.D.C.1992).

American President Lines, Ltd. v. Federal Maritime Board

133 F. Supp. 100 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 1955

This is a proceeding in which the plaintiff American President Lines, Ltd., a subsidized shipping operator, seeks a declaratory judgment against the Federal Maritime Board and its individual members. … The contention of the plaintiff here is that this determination of the Board was discriminatory and invalid, and should be so declared by this Court by a declaratory judgment.