Case law

Porter v. MacY's Job Employment Center

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 670 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Kurdyukov v. United States Coast Guard

578 F. Supp. 2d 114 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2008

the discovery of 8[,]800 pounds of cocaine on board. … tons of cocaine on board.”

Marshall v. Allison

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 2012

More formally, Major Allison sent an email to Major Mark Brown, Development Secretary for the Southern Territory, explaining that he had permitted Mr. … Blodgett v. Univ. Club, 930 A.2d 210, 222 (D.C. 2007) (quoting Oparaugo v. Watts, 884 A.2d 63, 76 (D.C. 2005).

Little v. Fenty

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2010

Board of Elections and Ethics in June and October of 2009, in which he “petition[ed] the Board to deny any petition for referendum or initiative relating to recognizing marriage being between one man and one woman citing … Board of Elections and Ethics).

Gover v. President

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 7, 2010

(internal quotations omitted); see Hagans v. … Although mindful that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers, see Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972), Brown v.

Lee v. Manpower US Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2016

(See Neal v. Kelly, 963 F.2d 453, 456 (D.C. Cir. 1992); Fox v. Strickland, 837 F.2d 507, 509 (D.C. Cir. 1988).) … DATE: December 13, 2016 KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

United States v. Green

652 F. Supp. 1312 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 1987

In United States v. … See United States v. James, 764 F.2d at 890 ; United States v. Lawson, 682 F.2d at 1017 ; United States v.

Allen v. Allen

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 2022

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr. Corp., 71 F.

Polcari v. John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts

712 F. Supp. 230 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 3, 1989

Expeditions Unlimited Aquatic Enterprises, Inc. v. Smithsonian Institution, 566 F.2d 289, 296 (D.C.Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915 , 98 S.Ct. 3144 , 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978). … This Board must report annually to Congress and the Smithsonian Institution on the Center’s operations and finances. 20 U.S.C. § 76Z (c).

Schwaner v. Department of the Air Force

698 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 1988

Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 744-45 (D.C.Cir.1979). … Compare, Disabled Officer’s Ass’n v. Rumsfeld, 428 F.Supp. 454 (D.D.C.1977), aff 'd. mem. sub. nom., Disabled Officer’s Ass’n v. Brown, 574 F.2d 636 (D.C.

Johnson v. Bowser

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 21, 2024

) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Code § 50-2303.11(a), and if reconsideration is denied, he or she may appeal the Hearing Examiner’s decision to the Traffic Adjudication Appeals Board (“TAAB”) of the District of Columbia Department of Public Works, see

Maloy v. Internal Revenue Service

District Court, District of Columbia · May 9, 2023

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr. Corp., 71 F.

A. S. Beck Shoe Corp. v. Brenner

299 F. Supp. 1362 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 1969

It was definitively defined by the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Ecco Standard Oil Co. v. … A similar thought was pointedly expressed by the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals in an opinion written by the late Judge O’Connell in Celanese Corporation of America v. E. I.

Lewis v. Full Sail, LLC

266 F. Supp. 3d 320 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2017

(quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Demitry v. Rosman

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 22, 2023

Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007). … See, e.g., Brown v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. Feb. 5, 2016) (dismissing a complaint sua sponte for failing to comply with FRCP 8(a)); Hamrick v.

Malarkey-Taylor Associates, Inc. v. Cellular Telecommunications Industry Ass'n

929 F. Supp. 473 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 21, 1996

Starting in April, 1995, plaintiffs offered subscribers to the WirelessNOW service access to an electronic bulletin board containing wireless industry news, data and information. … Bulletin board services are dial-in computer services which may or may not be linked to the Internet.

Morgan v. Lindsay

597 F. Supp. 1314 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 29, 1984

On July 14, 1984, the Disciplinary Board found the plaintiff guilty of assault and inciting a riot. … Hewitt v. Helms, 459 U.S. 460 , 103 S.Ct. 864 , 74 L.Ed.2d 675 (1983). There can be no protected liberty interest here, because of the plaintiffs own conduct.

Forbes v. Brownell

149 F. Supp. 848 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 1957

Vidal y Planas v. Landon, supra.; Cf. Ablett v. Brownell, supra. … Ablett v. Brownell, supra.; Vidal y Planas v. Landon, supra; United States ex rel. Meyer v. Day, 2 Cir., 1931, 54 F.2d 336 . The case of Whitty v.

Conax Florida Corp. v. United States

641 F. Supp. 408 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 1986

See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 318 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1725 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979); Megapulse, Inc. v. Lewis, 672 F.2d 959, 964-70 (D.C.Cir.1982). … Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Costle, 657 F.2d at 284 (citing Camp v. Pitts, 411 U.S. at 142 , 93 S.Ct. at 1244 ).

Flight Options, LLC v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2018

Flight Options seeks to vacate an arbitration award of the parties’ System Board of Adjustment (Board), which was issued by Homer La Rue as Impartial Arbitrator and Board Chair from his place of business in Columbia, Maryland … Burger King, 471 U.S. at 474 (citing Int’l Shoe Co. v.