Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.36s
District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 20, 2011
Fed’n of Teachers, AFL-CIO v. Bullock, 605 F. Supp. 2d 251, 257 (D.D.C. 2009). … See Brown v. FBI, 744 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrokamp v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2026
If an applicant meets all the requirements, she may receive her license after submitting an application “to the board regulating the health occupation on the form required by the board” and “pay[ing] the applicable fees … United States v. Playboy Ent.
Cited 0 timesPublished277 F. Supp. 3d 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2017
See Nassar, 133 S.Ct. at 2531-33 ; Breeden, 532 U.S. at 272 , 121 S.Ct. 1508 ; Cruz, 241 F.Supp.3d at 113 ; see also Brown v. … v.
Cited 17 timesPublishedWright v. President of the United State Bank
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 2019
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.” Cheeks v. Fort Myer Constr. Corp., 71 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedIn Re National Student Marketing Litigation
413 F. Supp. 1159 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 26, 1976
Brown & Sons Retirement Trust. 3 . Received in exchange for its Interstate shares, pursuant to the NSMC/Interstate merger of October 31, 1969. 4 . Yonce v. … See: Maricopa County v. American Petrofina Inc., 322 F.Supp. 467 (N.D.Calif.1971). Cf., Philadelphia Housing Authority v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedChandler v. W.E. Welch & Associates, Inc.
533 F. Supp. 2d 94 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 2008
See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d at 242 . C. … See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d at 242 .
Cited 53 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2020
v. … Stokes v. U.S. Parole Comm’n, 374 F.3d 3 Thompson’s complaint also includes allegations regarding his administrative appeal to the National Appeal Board and the Board’s alleged failure to respond to that appeal.
Cited 0 timesPublished46 F. Supp. 3d 52 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 2014
See Barnhart v. … (quoting Modica v. United States, 518 F.2d 374, 376 (5th Cir. 1975).
Cited 3 timesPublishedFeinberg v. Federal Deposit Insurance
385 F. Supp. 1304 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 27, 1974
Oestereich v. Selective Service System Local Board No. 11, 393 U.S. 233 , 89 S.Ct. 414 , 21 L.Ed.2d 402 (1968). … Accord, Breen v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16, 396 U.S. 460 , 90 S.Ct. 661 , 24 L.Ed.2d 653 (1970).
Cited 0 timesPublished821 F. Supp. 2d 384 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 4, 2011
Another case Plaintiff cites is Brown v. … Finally, unlike Brown, the rape was not an outgrowth of actions on New Leaf’s behalf.
Cited 26 timesPublishedPage v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.
498 F. Supp. 2d 223 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 2007
Pulliam v. Cont’l Cas. Co., Civil Action No. 02-370(RWR), 2006 WL 3003977 , at *2 (D.D.C. Oct.20, 2006) (citing Virtual Def., Dev. Int’l, Inc. v. Rep. of Mold., 133 F.Supp.2d 9, 20 (D.D.C.2001) (quoting Neuder v. … In support of its argument, PBGC relies heavily on Cobell v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2020
Brown, 411 F. Supp. 3d 446 (S. D. Iowa Oct. 8, 2019) (strongly implying that changes to how sentences are calculated could be an extraordinary and compelling reason to modify a sentence); United States v. … See United States v. Brown, 411 F. Supp. 3d 446, 451 (S.D.
Cited 0 timesPublishedMassachusetts Law Reform Institute v. Legal Services Corp.
581 F. Supp. 1179 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 1984
Virginia Petroleum Jobbers Association v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921, 925 (D.C.Cir. 1958). … Washington Metropolitan Transit Comm’n v. Holiday Tours, 559 F.2d 841, 843-44 (D.C.Cir.1977). A.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Apr 12, 2018
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678-79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 66l, 668-'7l (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff purports to sue the “Pentagon.” She is “suing for contract or contracts” and seeks twenty-five percent of $20 billion.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBaystate Heath System v. Thompson
309 F. Supp. 2d 89 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2004
If the provider objects to the Board’s conclusion, it may seek judicial review, provided that the provider files suit within 60 days of the Board’s determination. … See Wilkinson v.
Cited 1 timesPublished445 F. Supp. 2d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 18, 2006
Pragma, relying on the Fifth Circuit’s opinion in Lazarus v. … Lazarus, 958 F.2d at 1304 (quoting Severin v. Exxon Corp., 910 F.2d 286, 289 (5th Cir.1990)); see, e.g., Connors v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Apr 2, 2019
Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 n.6 (1989)). … See Lewis v. Bayh, 577 F. Supp. 2d 47, 54 (D.D.C. 2008) (quoting Brown v. Dist. Unemployment Comp. Bd., 411 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPenny v. U.S. Department of justice/u.S. Marshals Service
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2009
April of 1989” for the foregoing property and “any and all records or documents” pertaining to the leasing and occupancy of said property by the plaintiff, Tammy Brown and unnamed individuals during the 1990s. … See Buggs v. Powell, 293 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedJohnson-Tanner v. First Cash Financial Services, Inc.
239 F. Supp. 2d 34 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 2, 2003
Meteor Photo Reprographic Sys., Inc., 1987 WL 11085 at **5, 6 (finding alter ego test satisfied in part where parent and subsidiary shared two of three members of board of directors and where one co-manager of parent was … See, e.g., Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999). Defendants’ argument is of no avail.
Cited 6 timesPublished26 F. Supp. 3d 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2014
Budik v. Dartmouth-Hitchcock 6 Med. Ctr., 937 F. Supp. 2d 5, 11 (D.D.C. 2013) (quoting Chandler v. Roche, 215 F. Supp. 2d 166, 168 (D.D.C. 2002)); see also Moore v. … DATE: March 18, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Cited 30 timesPublished
Ask Donna