Case law

Morgan v. Ragan

46 F. Supp. 3d 52 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 2014

See Barnhart v. … (quoting Modica v. United States, 518 F.2d 374, 376 (5th Cir. 1975).

Brokamp v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2026

If an applicant meets all the requirements, she may receive her license after submitting an application “to the board regulating the health occupation on the form required by the board” and “pay[ing] the applicable fees … United States v. Playboy Ent.

Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures v. United States

346 F. Supp. 189 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 10, 1972

See also Greene County Planning Board v. FPC, 2 Cir., 455 F.2d 412 (1972); Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. Corps of Engineers, E.D.Ark., 325 F.Supp. 749, 756 (1971). … See Greene County Planning Board v. F.P.C., 2 Cir., 455 E.2d 412, 420 (1972). 5 .

Rodearmel v. Clinton

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 2009

Rodearmel relies on Board of Education v. Allen, 392 U.S. 236 (1968), and Clarke v. United States, 705 F. Supp. 605 (D.D.C. 1988), aff’d, 886 F.2d 404 (D.C. Cir. 1989), reh’g denied, 898 F.2d 161 (D.C. … There can be no doubt that [the school board members] thus have a “personal stake in the outcome” of this litigation. Id. at 241 n.5 (quoting Baker v.

United States v. Yunis

681 F. Supp. 909 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 1988

Miranda v. … Dostal v.

Wellness Pharmacy, Inc. v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 21, 2021

The Final Standard MOU establishes an agreement between individual state pharmacy boards and FDA. … v=oQoo6bZckug (California State Board Executive Officer stating that “we will probably be recommending at the staff level that some of these reporting obligations actually get pushed to the licensees that are actually performing

Lewis v. Stempson

737 F. Supp. 667 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 1990

Fletcher v. Braxton, Civil Action No. 88-2866-GHR (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 1988); see also McCall v. Swain, 510 F.2d 167, 182 (D.C.Cir.1975); Washington-El v. Thornburgh, Civil Action No. 89-0784-GHR, 1990 WL 93430 (D.D.C. … Mar. 2, 1990); Pittman v. Ridley, Civil Action No. 89-2529-GHR, 1990 WL 93433 (Feb. 27, 1990); Williams v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, Civil Action No. 88-1924-GHR (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 1988); Bland v.

Reed v. Cushwa

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2021

Cartner v. Davis, 988 F. Supp. 2d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2013) (quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)). III. … Parole Board” or contracted to be sentenced by the Superior Court); id. at 12 (“Petitioner assert[s] that the U.S.

Memorial Hospital of South Bend v. Azar

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2022

v. … 21 overturn the Board’s jurisdictional decision.

Powell v. Bergersen

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2025

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to provide Defendants or this Court with adequate notice of Plaintiff’s intended claims.

United States v. Terry

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 2020

See Welch v. United States, 136 S. … .”); United States v. Brown, 868 F.3d 297, 301–02 (4th Cir. 2017) (similar).

Hoenig v. Parker

267 F. 323 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 2, 1920

He .is not entitled to any date before December 24, 1914, the date accorded him by the board of examiners. … Hathaway v. Field, 48 App. D. C. 370, 371, and cases there cited.

Stewart v. Musk

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 2026

Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (quotation marks omitted) 3 (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … And central to the CSRA’s framework is “the primacy” of the Merit System Protection Board (“MSPB”) “for administrative resolution of disputes over adverse personnel action, . . . and the primacy of the United States Court

Hu v. Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · May 13, 2013

Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994); see, e.g., Bestor v. Lieberman, No. 03-1470 (RWR), 2005 WL 681460 (D.D.C. March 11, 2005) (dismissing case under Fed. R. Civ. … Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972).

POLICE OFFICERS'GUILD, NAT. U. OF POL. OF. v. Washington

369 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 1973

Each entered documentary evidence; gave testimony before the Board; presented oral argument; and submitted written briefs to the Board. … In Hobson v. Hansen, 265 F. Supp. 902 (D.D.C. 1967), a three-judge court on constitutional grounds upheld a statute directing this court to appoint members of the local school board. Again, in Harrell v.

McLaughlin v. Mukasey

828 F. Supp. 2d 230 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 2011

See Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976); Richardson v. Wiley, 569 F.2d 140, 141 (D.C. Cir. 1977) (noting a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 must be brought under Title VII). … See e.g., Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 823-33 (1976)). 14 Ms.

American Federation of Government Employees v. Rumsfeld

422 F. Supp. 2d 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2006

V. … Co. v. Sys.

Hu v. K4 Solutions, Inc

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2020

Browning-Ferris Indus. of Pa., Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1123 (3d Cir. 1982). See, e.g., Redd v. Summers, 232 F.3d 933, 937–38 (D.C. … Browning-Ferris, 691 F.2d at 1124.

Wagner v. United States Government

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 9, 2023

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973); see also Sargeant v. Dixon, 130 F.3d 1067, 1069 (D.C. Cir. 1997); Powell v. Katzenbach, 359 F.2d 234, 234–35 (D.C. Cir. 1965); Sattler v.

Memorial Hospital v. Sullivan

779 F. Supp. 1406 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 10, 1991

Plaintiff then appealed to the Provider Reimbursement Review Board on July 27, 1989. Id. at 5 . … Cntr. v. Schweiker, 741 F.2d 1447 (D.C.Cir.1984); Stormont-Vail Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 645 F.Supp. 1182, 1187 (D.D.C.1986).