Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

7.51s

  • Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

    108 F. Supp. 2d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2000

    Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473 (D.D.C.1998). … See Brown-Jones v. The Am. Tobacco Co., No. CV198-36, slip op. at 9-12 (attached as Ex. C, Defs.’ Mot.); Wakeland v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 996 F.Supp. 1213, 1221-22 (S.D.Ala.1998).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Inova Health Care Services, for Inova Fairfax Hospital and Its Department, Life With Cancer v. Omni Shoreham Corporation

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2020

    Omni Shoreham relies primarily on Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235 (D.C. … See 9 Mem., Browning v. Clinton, No. 98-cv-1991, at 2, 13–14, 24 (D.D.C. Feb. 12, 2001), ECF No. 109. 16 added); see also Hall v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Board of Elections

    319 F. Supp. 437 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 19, 1970

    In Lyons v. … In Georgia Socialist Workers Party v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Santora v. Copyright Claims Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2026

    See Bowman v. Iddon, 848 F.3d 1034, 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2017). That means, among other things, considering factual allegations from all his filings, not just his complaint. Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … Comm’n v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Georgetown University Hospital Medstar Health

    828 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2011

    It is undisputed that Brown is African-American, and, as such, Brown is a member of a protected class. See Brownfield v. Bair, 541 F. Supp. 22 35, 41 (D.D.C. 2008). … Nor does Brown’s suspension with pay constitute an adverse employment action. See Roberson v. Snow, 404 F. Supp. 2d 79, 93 (D.D.C. 2005) (collecting cases); Boykin v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • M&T Bank v. Brown

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 12, 2022

    BROWN, et al., Defendants. … See, e.g., Berezovsky v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 12, 2019

    Aff. of Randy Brown ¶ 25. … Aff. of Randy Brown ¶ 25.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thompson v. Capitol Police Board

    120 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 26, 2000

    See, e.g., Guerra v. … In Howell v.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Heartwood, Inc. v. United States Forest Service

    431 F. Supp. 2d 28 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2006

    Council v. … See, e.g., Nader v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Cutler v. Civil Aeronautics Board

    375 F. Supp. 722 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 1974

    Stretch v. Weinberger, 495 F.2d 639 (3d Cir. 1974); Dellums v. H. E. W., No. 181-72 (D.D.C. July 11, 1973). 2 Section 1504 satisfies neither of these criteria. … See Environmental Protection Agency v. Mink, 410 U.S. 73, 80 , 93 S.Ct. 827 , 35 L.Ed.2d 119 (1973); Getman v. N. L. R. B., 146 U.S.App.D.C. 209 , 450 F.2d 670, 672 (1971) ; Soucie v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Achagzai v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

    170 F. Supp. 3d 164 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2016

    See Rafi v. … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam).

    Cited 98 timesPublished
  • Nwachukwu v. Rooney

    362 F. Supp. 2d 183 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 2005

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). The complaint need only set forth a short and plain statement of the claim, giving the defendant fair notice of the claim and the grounds upon which it rests. … Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Development v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • Brown v. District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 30, 2019

    The Court previously held that, under the plain language of the IDEA, the District—and not the BOP—was obligated to provide Brown a FAPE while he was in BOP custody. See Brown v. District of Columbia, 324 F. … See FCC v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Federal Election Commission

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 13, 2019

    Winter v. NRDC, 555 U.S. 7, 22 (2008). … See, e.g., Holmes v. FEC, 71 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Achagzai v. Broadcasting Board of Governors

    109 F. Supp. 3d 67 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 2015

    ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Broadcasting Board of Governors … Herbert v. Nat’l Acad. of Sciences, 974 F.2d 192, 197 (D.C. Cir. 1992).

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Brown v. U.S. bluecross/blueshield

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 2019

    BROWN, SR\., Plaintz`jj‘, v. No. l9-cv-320 (UNA) U.S. BLUE CROSS/BLUE SHIELD, j it Defendant. … See Arzderson v. Usher, No. 12-7107, 2013 WL 1187399, at *l (D.C. Cir.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Melcher v. Federal Open Market Committee

    644 F. Supp. 510 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 1986

    Thus, the action had to be stayed September 26, 1984, pending the appeal in Committee for Monetary Reform v. Board of Governors, No. 83-1730 (D.D.C. … Committee for Monetary Reform v. Board of Governors, supra, 766 F.2d at 543-44 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Trans Union, LLC

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 2022

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Shuntay Antonio Brown, : : Plaintiff, : v. … P. 42(a); Hall v. Hall, 138 S. Ct. 1118, 1125 (2018)). It took “no position on the merits of consolidated case No. 21-cv-113, Brown v. Trans Union LLC, et al.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Brown

    740 F. Supp. 2d 148 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2010

    Defendant Brown’s Motion to Dismiss Count V is therefore denied. 4. … Moreover, the Browning-Ferris court also ruled that plaintiffs failed to allege any relationship between the pending civil lawsuits and the directors elected to the board during the relevant period of time.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Levi v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation

    851 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2012

    See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Firestone, 76 F.3d at 1211 (citations omitted); see Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 108 F.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.