Case law

Brown v. Potomac Electric Power Company

236 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 1964

App.D.C. 68, 69-70, 183 F.2d 822, 823 (1950); Washington Loan & Trust Co. v. Hickey, supra note 6 , 78 U.S.App. D.C. at 61, 137 F.2d at 679 ; Brown v. … Jones, 133 Ala. 217 , 32 So. 500 (1902); Brown v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co., 90 Md. 400 , 45 Atl. 182 , 78 Am.St.Rep. 442 , 46 L.R.A. 745 (1900); City of Marlow v.

['Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.']

25 F. Supp. 3d 144 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2014

Class In order to show that Brown’s claims are precluded by the In re Wachovia Corp. class settlement, Wells Fargo must first show that Brown was a member of that class. See Cooper v. … Pigford v. Veneman, 355 F. Supp. 2d 148, 162 (D.D.C. 2005) (alteration in original) (quoting Reppert v. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co., Inc., 359 F.3d 53, 56-57 (1st Cir. 2004); see also Hallman v. Pa. Life Ins.

United States v. Sanford Ltd.

841 F. Supp. 2d 309 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2012

SI Count V at ¶ 2. … See United States v.

Brown v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

384 F. Supp. 2d 271 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2005

Brown,” and that “Ms. Brown has hired me to obtain certain documentation pursuant to [FOIA].” Ex. A at 1. … See Beck v.

Brown v. U.S. Department of Justice

734 F. Supp. 2d 99 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 30, 2010

Ferranti v. … Steinberg v. U.S.

Disparte v. Corporate Executive Board

223 F.R.D. 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 13, 2004

United States v. … But see Grayson v.

Brown v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 2020

Brown v. District of Columbia, 928 F.3d 1070, 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2019). The court of appeals therefore remanded for a new trial. See id. at 1083-85 (laying out remand instructions). … See Brown v. District of Columbia, 928 F.3d 1070. Since then, both parties have sought extensions of time to complete discovery.

United States v. Brown

688 F. Supp. 755 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 27, 1988

See also, Gomez v. Turner, 672 F.2d 134 (D.C.Cir.1982), United States v. Wylie, 569 F.2d 62 (D.C.Cir.1977). … Brown consented to the search. In view of the above, the defendant’s motion to suppress must be denied. An appropriate order has been entered. .

Brown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

822 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 2011

The Division then searched the criminal and civil modules of TaxDoc using the search term “Timothy Brown” along with plaintiffs Social Security number. Id. … Failure to State a Claim A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint. *4 Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002).

United States v. Brown

663 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 1986

See United States v. Harris, 140 U.S.App.D.C. 270 , 435 F.2d 74, 82 (1970) (citing Keiningham v. … In Sabbath v.

Brown v. United States Elevator Corp.

102 F.R.D. 526 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 1984

Compare Societe Internationale v. Rogers, 357 U.S. 197 , 78 S.Ct. 1087 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1255 (1958), with Hinson v. Michigan Mutual Liability Co., 275 F.2d 537 (5th Cir.1960). … See Butler v. Pearson, 636 F.2d 526 (D.C.Cir.1980).

United States v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 12, 2017

Brown] is no longer ACCA-eligible establishes prejudice.” United States v. Cruz, No. 05-30044, 2017 WL 603176, at *1 (D. Mass. Feb. 14, 2017); see also United States v. Bryant, No. 12-62, 2017 WL 635498, at *5 (W.D. Va. … States v.

Brown v. Upper Marlboro Town Police

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2009

District and JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR, Bankruptcy Courts Plaintiff, v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.RD. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff's complaint fails to accomplish the basic purpose of Rule 8(a).

Brown v. Wheat First Securities, Inc.

101 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 13, 2000

Brown, a former employee of defendant Wheat First Securities, Inc., is suing Wheat First, First Union Corp., and several individuals employed by Wheat First for conspiracy in violation of Section 2 of the Civil Rights Act … The Act establishes “a federal policy favoring arbitration,” Shearson/American Express v. McMahon, 482 U.S. 220, 226 , 107 S.Ct. 2332 , 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987) (citing Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v.

United States v. Board

744 F. Supp. 6 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 1990

Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). … Id. at 233, 105 S.Ct. at 682 ; See also Whiteley v.

District of Columbia Nurses Association v. Brown

153 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 4, 2016

It provides that, when an officer of a labor organization is alleged to have violated the duties in Section 501(a), “and the labor organization or its governing board or officers refuse or fail to sue or recover damages … If Brown wishes to argue that it does not, he should file a motion consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(2) by not later than February 1, 2016. See DSMC, Inc. v. Convera Corp., 273 F.

Scahill v. District of Columbia

271 F. Supp. 3d 216 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2017

See Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1286 (D.C. … Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997) (quoting Monell v. N.Y.C. Dep’t of Soc.

Brown v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2023

BROWN, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:21-cv-1308 (TNM) v. … Selig v. Islamic Repub. of Iran, 573 F.

Brown v. United Community National Bank

282 F. Supp. 781 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 1968

At that meeting a Board of Directors was elected and at the board’s organizational meeting, on the same day, the Organization Certificate was executed and the Articles of Association adopted. … In Kerr v.

Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M STREET LLC

257 F. Supp. 2d 175 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 8, 2003

In August 1999, plaintiff Pauline Johnson-Brown contracted with the defendants to purchase a condominium in the Ritz-Carlton Residences, and plaintiff Lara Michelle Brown joined the contract by addendum. Id. at 5. … Carden v.