Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

2.14s

  • Brown v. District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2011

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YVONNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Lutkewitte v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 248, 252-54 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. District of Columbia

    66 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 1999

    It also states the Board’s conclusion that Brown posed a “threat to self and others due to the alleged incident involving correctional staff,” concluding with the statement “Resident Brown assaulted Cpl. Parks.” … See Brown v. Plant, 131 F.3d 163 (D.C.Cir.1997). The Court concludes that plaintiff did not receive adequate process under Hewitt .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Harris v. District of Columbia

    696 F. Supp. 2d 123 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2010

    Brown v. Bureau of Prisons, 498 F.Supp.2d 298, 301 (D.D.C.2007); see Marshall v. … Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1245 (D.C.App.1986). In Brown, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals relied on the approach taken by the California state courts and cited with approval their reasoning.

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

    821 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 1993

    Ago v. Begg, Inc., 705 F.Supp. 613, 616 (D.D.C.1988), aff'd, 911 F.2d 819 (D.C.Cir.1990). … V. DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. Defendants have requested that these motions be addressed at oral argument.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 3, 2011

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YVONNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … That Plaintiff Yvonne Brown was subjected to a sexually hostile work environment? YES. [...] 2.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

    744 F. Supp. 2d 120 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2010

    BACKGROUND The background of this case is discussed fully in Brown v. FBI, 675 F.Supp.2d 122 (D.D.C.2009). … Brown’s motion for leave to amend therefore will be denied also with respect to this proposed amendment. Cf . Adair v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Columbia Sussex Corporation

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2010

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANTONIO BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, … See Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets, 313 U.S. 100, 108 (1941); LaPoint v. Mid-Atlantic Settlement Servs., 256 F. Supp. 2d 1,3 (D.D.C. 2003).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Artery Organization, Inc.

    691 F. Supp. 1459 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 1987

    See Reynolds v. Sheet Metal Workers, Local 102, 702 F.2d 221, 226 (D.C.Cir.1981). … See Orantes-Hernandez v. Smith, 541 F.Supp. 351 (C.D.Cal.1982); Bartels v. Biernat, 405 F.Supp. 1012, 1019 (E.D.Wis.1975); Bass v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Psi Services, Inc.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2010

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANGELINA BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. D.C. Public Schools

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2010

    See Docket Entry #6 (captioned as "REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Dismiss and/or for More Definite Statement to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by DANNY BROWN." (emphasis omitted)). … (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 181 (1962))).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alaska Movers Ass'n v. Brown

    445 F. Supp. 363 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 1978

    Schraier v. Hickel, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 81 , 419 F.2d 663 (1969); Gonzalez v. Freeman, 118 U.S.App. D.C. 180, 334 F.2d 570 (1964); Copper Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Campbell, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 177 , 290 F.2d 368 (1961).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. District of Columbia

    822 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 1993

    After deliberation, the Adjustment Board found Brown guilty of all five charges. Brown was required to serve 14 days in administrative segregation or detention as a result of the findings of the Board. … presented at the hearing; and second, because the Board failed to provide Brown with an adequate written statement setting forth the evidence relied upon in reaching its decision.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Brown v. U.S. Parole Commission

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 2010

    The former District of Columbia Board of Parole (“Parole Board”) released petitioner on parole on March 9, 1998. USPC Opp’n, Ex. 3 (Certificate of Parole). … Petitioner apparently committed an armed robbery, which prompted the Parole Board to revoke his parole and to grant reparole immediately. Id., Ex. 4 (Notice of Board Order dated October 28, 1998).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Metro Transit Police Department

    87 F. Supp. 3d 145 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2015

    P. 56(a); see Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247 (1986); Estate of Parsons v. Palestinian Auth., 651 F.3d 118, 123 (D.C. Cir. 2011); Tao v. … See Myers v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Sanford Ltd.

    841 F. Supp. 2d 309 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2012

    SI Count V at ¶ 2. … See United States v.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2009

    District and JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Bankruptcy Courts Plaintiff, v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 CD.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs complaint fails to accomplish the basic purpose of Rule 8(a).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 2009

    T U T m mR l C JEROME JULIUS BROWN … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs complaint fails to accomplish the basic purpose of Rule 8(a).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Calloway v. Parole Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 4, 2010

    Calloway, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 10-0279 (JDB) Parole Board, Respondent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 16, 2021

    Brown v. District of Columbia, 322 F.R.D. 51, 96 (D.D.C. 2017). She therefore entered judgment for the District of Columbia. See id. Plaintiffs appealed and the court of appeals reversed. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 928 F.3d 1070, 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2019). The court of appeals therefore remanded for a new trial. See id. at 1083-85 (laying out remand instructions).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Suburban Propane, Lp

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 26, 2009

    District and FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bankruptcy Courts JEROME JULIDS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff, v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs complaint fails to accomplish the basic purpose of Rule 8(a).

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.