Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.14s
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YVONNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Lutkewitte v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 248, 252-54 (D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublished66 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 1999
It also states the Board’s conclusion that Brown posed a “threat to self and others due to the alleged incident involving correctional staff,” concluding with the statement “Resident Brown assaulted Cpl. Parks.” … See Brown v. Plant, 131 F.3d 163 (D.C.Cir.1997). The Court concludes that plaintiff did not receive adequate process under Hewitt .
Cited 1 timesPublishedHarris v. District of Columbia
696 F. Supp. 2d 123 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2010
Brown v. Bureau of Prisons, 498 F.Supp.2d 298, 301 (D.D.C.2007); see Marshall v. … Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1245 (D.C.App.1986). In Brown, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals relied on the approach taken by the California state courts and cited with approval their reasoning.
Cited 33 timesPublished821 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 1993
Ago v. Begg, Inc., 705 F.Supp. 613, 616 (D.D.C.1988), aff'd, 911 F.2d 819 (D.C.Cir.1990). … V. DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. Defendants have requested that these motions be addressed at oral argument.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 3, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YVONNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … That Plaintiff Yvonne Brown was subjected to a sexually hostile work environment? YES. [...] 2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
744 F. Supp. 2d 120 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2010
BACKGROUND The background of this case is discussed fully in Brown v. FBI, 675 F.Supp.2d 122 (D.D.C.2009). … Brown’s motion for leave to amend therefore will be denied also with respect to this proposed amendment. Cf . Adair v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedBrown v. Columbia Sussex Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANTONIO BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, … See Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets, 313 U.S. 100, 108 (1941); LaPoint v. Mid-Atlantic Settlement Servs., 256 F. Supp. 2d 1,3 (D.D.C. 2003).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Artery Organization, Inc.
691 F. Supp. 1459 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 1987
See Reynolds v. Sheet Metal Workers, Local 102, 702 F.2d 221, 226 (D.C.Cir.1981). … See Orantes-Hernandez v. Smith, 541 F.Supp. 351 (C.D.Cal.1982); Bartels v. Biernat, 405 F.Supp. 1012, 1019 (E.D.Wis.1975); Bass v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2010
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANGELINA BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2010
See Docket Entry #6 (captioned as "REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Dismiss and/or for More Definite Statement to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by DANNY BROWN." (emphasis omitted)). … (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 181 (1962))).
Cited 0 timesPublished445 F. Supp. 363 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 1978
Schraier v. Hickel, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 81 , 419 F.2d 663 (1969); Gonzalez v. Freeman, 118 U.S.App. D.C. 180, 334 F.2d 570 (1964); Copper Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Campbell, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 177 , 290 F.2d 368 (1961).
Cited 1 timesPublished822 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 1993
After deliberation, the Adjustment Board found Brown guilty of all five charges. Brown was required to serve 14 days in administrative segregation or detention as a result of the findings of the Board. … presented at the hearing; and second, because the Board failed to provide Brown with an adequate written statement setting forth the evidence relied upon in reaching its decision.
Cited 1 timesPublishedBrown v. U.S. Parole Commission
District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 2010
The former District of Columbia Board of Parole (“Parole Board”) released petitioner on parole on March 9, 1998. USPC Opp’n, Ex. 3 (Certificate of Parole). … Petitioner apparently committed an armed robbery, which prompted the Parole Board to revoke his parole and to grant reparole immediately. Id., Ex. 4 (Notice of Board Order dated October 28, 1998).
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrown v. Metro Transit Police Department
87 F. Supp. 3d 145 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2015
P. 56(a); see Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247 (1986); Estate of Parsons v. Palestinian Auth., 651 F.3d 118, 123 (D.C. Cir. 2011); Tao v. … See Myers v.
Cited 3 timesPublished841 F. Supp. 2d 309 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2012
SI Count V at ¶ 2. … See United States v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedBrown v. Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2009
District and JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Bankruptcy Courts Plaintiff, v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 CD.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs complaint fails to accomplish the basic purpose of Rule 8(a).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 2009
T U T m mR l C JEROME JULIUS BROWN … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs complaint fails to accomplish the basic purpose of Rule 8(a).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 4, 2010
Calloway, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 10-0279 (JDB) Parole Board, Respondent.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Apr 16, 2021
Brown v. District of Columbia, 322 F.R.D. 51, 96 (D.D.C. 2017). She therefore entered judgment for the District of Columbia. See id. Plaintiffs appealed and the court of appeals reversed. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 928 F.3d 1070, 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2019). The court of appeals therefore remanded for a new trial. See id. at 1083-85 (laying out remand instructions).
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 26, 2009
District and FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bankruptcy Courts JEROME JULIDS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff, v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs complaint fails to accomplish the basic purpose of Rule 8(a).
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna