Case law

United States v. Sidow

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025

See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.

United States v. Dahlquist

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2025

See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1245 (D.C. Cir. 1986), and citing Kenley v.

University of Chicago Medical Center v. Burwell

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 2024

Gentiva Health Servs., Inc. v. Becerra, 31 F.4th 766, 775 (D.C. Cir. 2022) (affording “considerable deference” to the Board’s decisions (quoting Marymount Hosp., Inc. v. Shalala, 19 F.3d 658, 661 (D.C. … Hosp. v. Leavitt, 539 F.

United States v. Amos

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 23, 2025

See Brown v. Amtrak Corp., No. 03-7003, 2003 WL 22433755, at *1 (D.C. Cir. Oct. 27, 2023) (“A dismissal ‘with prejudice’ is a final judgment on the merits which bars further litigation between the same parties.” … See also Thorp v. District of Columbia, 142 F. Supp. 3d 132, 145 (D.D.C. 2015) (noting that dismissal with prejudice “reflect[s] on the merits of the underlying action” (quoting Brown v.

Epstein v. Geren

539 F. Supp. 2d 267 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2008

Legal Standard for Judicial Review of Military Correction Board Decisions “Congress has entrusted the primary duty of correcting military rec *275 ords with the [military] correction boards.” Harris v. … Musengo v.

Tango v. United States Capitol Police

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 2023

(quoting Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C. … See Chambers v. District of Columbia, 35 F.4th 870, 874 (D.C. Cir. 2022) (en banc). 5 Overruling Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 (D.C.

Brown v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.

26 F. Supp. 2d 74 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 1998

B., Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co. ., 663 F.2d 545, 549 (5th Cir.1981); see Marshall v. Manville Sales Corp., 6 F.3d 229, 232 (4th Cir.1993); Richardson v. Phillip Morris Inc., 950 F.Supp. 700, 702 (D.Md.1997). … Pulse One Communications, Inc. v.

Savage v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2019

(quoting Brown v. … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 148 n.1 (1984) (per curiam) (citing former Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(e)).

Anderson v. Brown

District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2024

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA QUINCY RAHSAAN ANDERSON, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. … ) Civil Action No. 1:24-cv-01067 (UNA) ) ) KIM BROWN, et al.,

Houlahan v. Brown

979 F. Supp. 2d 86 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 2013

No. 21, Defendant Brown's Motion to Dismiss. … Helmer v. Doletskaya, 393 F.3d 201, 205 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (citing Crane v. Carr, 814 F.2d 758, 762 (D.C. Cir. 1987)).

Brown v. Salazar

134 F. Supp. 3d 170 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2015

The Decision advised Brown that he had 30 days to appeal the decision to the Merit Systems Protection Board (the “MSPB” or the “Board”) or a federal district court. (Id. at 15). … P. 56(a); see also Anderson v.

Brown v. Shinseki

District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 2023

BROWN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 14-1457 (JMC) v. DENIS R.

Coles v. Harvey

471 F. Supp. 2d 46 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 11, 2007

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … In Browning-Ferris, the Third Circuit, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Boire v.

Brown v. Miller

286 F. 994 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 1923

E. 422 ; Weidekind v. County Water Co., 74 Cal. 386 , 19 Pac. 173 , 5 Am. St. Rep. 445 ; Gaulden v. State of Georgia, 11 Ga. 47 ; Nickels v. Griffin, 1 Wash. T. 374; Wilson v. State, 16 Ind. 392 ; Peirce v. … Brown had *998 such connection with this matter that I think renders it, I will not say grossly improper, but I think very inexpedient, for him to represent the plaintiff in this case.”

Brown v. Califano

75 F.R.D. 497 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 17, 1977

See Brown v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 411 F.Supp. 1001, 1002 (D.D.C.1975). … Koll v. Wayzata State Bank, supra, 397 F.2d at 127 ; Johnson v. Hunger, 266 F.Supp. 590, 591 (S.D.N.Y.1967).

Sloan v. Soul Circus, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2015

Zuckman v. Monster Beverage Corp., 958 F. Supp. 2d 293, 297 (D.D.C. 2013) (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Johnson–Brown v. 2200 M Street LLC, 257 F. … (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Johnson–Brown v. 2200 M Street LLC, 257 F. Supp. 2d 175, 177 (D.D.C. 2003))). The Court therefore considers the point conceded. See generally Cefarrati v.

Allen v. Brown

185 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 2016

of sworn testimony from Chief Brown, Director Hawkins, Deputy Chief of Police Cleveland Walls, and Officer Rodriguez-Soto, all of which were taken in April 2014 in the VA Medical Center’s Administrative Investigation Board … FTCA (COUNT V) In Count V, plaintiffs claim that the Department of Veterans Affairs, sued through Secretary McDonald in his official capacity as VA Secretary, is liable for damages under the FTCA for Chief Brown

Brown v. Dalton

312 F.R.D. 239 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 7, 2015

See Brown v. Mabus, 892 F. Supp. 2d 115 (D.D.C. 2012) aff'd, 548 F. App'x 623 (D.C. … See Brown v. Dep’t of the Navy, No. 86-1582 (D.D.C. Aug. 11, 2003).

Brown v. F.B.I.

675 F. Supp. 2d 122 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 28, 2009

Neal v. Kelly, 963 F.2d 453, 456 (D.C.Cir.1992) (quoting Lewis v. Faulkner, 689 F.2d 100, 102 (7th Cir.1982)). … Therefore, Brown was required to exhaust his administrative remedies by appealing the BOP’s response prior to filing this civil action. See Oglesby v.

Brown v. Mills

674 F. Supp. 2d 182 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 16, 2009

Brown’s conditions or terms of employment. See Velikonja v. … Fischbach v.