Case law

Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Boyd

207 F. Supp. 152 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 1962

In Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. C. A. … Mississippi v. Johnson, 4 Wall. 475 , 18 L.Ed. 437 ; Georgia v. Stanton, 6 Wall. 50 , 18 L.Ed. 721 ; Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 , 72 S.Ct. 863 , 96 L.Ed. 1153 .

Bergbauer v. Mabus

810 F. Supp. 2d 251 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 14, 2011

Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976). Ms. Bergbauer’s remaining Title VII sexual-harassment claim against the Secretary (Count I) will be dismissed for failure to state a claim. … Mathis v. Henderson, 243 F.3d 446, 450–51 (8th Cir. 2001) (quoting Pfau v. Reed, 125 F.3d 927, 933 (5th Cir. 1997)); see also Brown v. Children’s Nat’l Med. Ctr., 773 F. supp. 2d 125, 138–39 (D.D.C. 2011); Wade v.

In Re Report & Recommendation of June 5, 1972 Grand Jury Concerning Transmission of Evidence to the House of Representatives

370 F. Supp. 1219 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 1974

Brown, 323 F.Supp. 326 (N.D. … Atwell v.

Mountain States Health Alliance v. Sebelius

128 F. Supp. 3d 195 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 10, 2015

Part 413; 42 U.S.C. § 1395x(v)(1)(A). … Health Servs. v.

Remmie v. Mabus

898 F. Supp. 2d 108 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 15, 2012

Wilhelmus v. Geren, 796 F. … Powers v. Donley, 844 F.

McKinley v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

807 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 8, 2011

Larson v. Dep’t of State, 565 F.3d 857, 869 (D.C.Cir.2009) *5 (quoting Meeropol v. Meese, 790 F.2d 942, 956 (D.C.Cir.1986)). The search for records need not be exhaustive, see Oglesby v. U.S. … See Mason v.

Marshall v. James

276 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 2003

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 144-45 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d at 452 ). … See, e.g., Brown v.

Transamerica Corporation v. McCabe

80 F. Supp. 704 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 1948

Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp., 303 U.S. 41 , 58 S.Ct. 459 , 82 L.Ed. 638 ; Macauley v. Waterman Steamship Corp., 327 U.S. 540 , 66 S.Ct. 712 , 90 L.Ed. 839 ; and Federal Power Commission v. … The Supreme Court stated in the case of Myers v.

Judd v. Service Employees International Union Local 32bj

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2020

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C.

Ahuruonye v. Department of the Interior

District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 2022

Kittner v. Gates, 708 F.Supp.2d 47, 52 (D.D.C. 2010) (quoting Brown v. Gen. Servs. … Forkkio v. Powell, 306 F.3d 1127, 1130 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)); see also Carroll v. England, 321 F. Supp. 2d 58, 68 (D.D.C. 2004).

Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen

250 F. Supp. 691 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 3, 1966

In Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Toledo, P. & W. R. … In Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Chicago & N. W. R.

Beberman v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 2024

Further, the Board’s “determination should be read in context.” U.S. Sugar Corp. v. EPA, 830 F.3d 579, 642 (D.C. Cir. 2016). … Co., LLC v.

Ferguson v. McHugh

64 F. Supp. 3d 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2014

Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 793 (D.C. Cir. 2000). The district court is not to function as a “super correction board.” Charette v. Walker, 996 F. Supp. 43, 50 (D.D.C. 1998). … Ct. at 438 (citing Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 748 (1970)). Defendant argues that the Board applied the correct standard, citing Warren v. United States, 41 F. App’x 408 (Fed. Cir. 2002).

Bates v. Donley

935 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2013

In Rempfer v. AFBCMR, Judge Robertson vacated and remanded a denial of a records correction request because the Board did not consider the effect of Doe. 538 F. Supp. 2d at 210. … In fact, the Court finds that the Board for Correction’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. See Kight v. U.S., 850 F.

Black v. Saul

District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 2023

Defendant cites McKart v. … Kaul v. Fed’n of State Med. Boards, No. 19-cv-3050, 2020 WL 7042821, at *7 (D.D.C. Dec. 1, 2020).

Hadley v. Secretary of the Army

479 F. Supp. 189 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 1979

See Orloff v. Willoughby, supra; Allgood v. Kenan, 470 F.2d 1071 (9th Cir. 1972); Silverthorne v. Laird, 460 F.2d 1175, 1186 (5th Cir. 1972). … The statute is silent as to whether section 3303(c) also applies when the subsequent promotion is granted by a STAB Board. Cf. Knehans v.

Air Line Pilots Association International v. Federal Express Corporation

139 F. Supp. 3d 320 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2015

.”); Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. … Minor disputes are within the exclusive jurisdiction of system boards. See Consol. Rail Corp. v. Ry. Labor Execs.

Potts v. Howard University

240 F.R.D. 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 4, 2007

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61 , 64 & 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C.1998) (citing Kuwait Airways Corp. v. Am. Sec. Bank, N.A., 890 F.2d 456 , 463 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1989)).

Plotkin v. Shalala

88 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2000

See Barth v. Gelb, 2 F.3d 1180, 1186 (D.C.Cir.1993) (citing Doe v. New York Univ., 666 F.2d 761 , 776 (2d Cir.1981)). … See, e.g., Heilweil v. Mount Sinai Hospital, 32 F.3d 718 (2d Cir.1994); Byrne v. Board of Education, 979 F.2d 560, 565 (7th Cir.1992); Keck v.

Mercer Management Consulting, Inc. v. Wilde

920 F. Supp. 219 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 1996

Guth v. … Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1247 (D.C.1986). Moreover, the defendants’ interference must be improper.