Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
6.35s
New York Republican State Committee v. Securities and Exchange Commission
70 F. Supp. 3d 362 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2014
See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … .”); Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 121 (1994) (“[C]ongressional silence lacks persuasive significance" (internal quotation marks omitted)); Girouard v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedStrunk v. United States Department of Commerce Bureau of the Census
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2010
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Brown, S.J." as his opposition to the motion to dismiss [#10] filed on behalf of Maryland Province of the Society of Jesus and Timothy B.
Cited 0 timesPublished840 F. Supp. 2d 245 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 2012
See Pl.’s Opp’n, Brown Dep. at 66. … In Brown’s deposition, she acknowledged that Loya had “asked to be moved back to the Portals building.” Pl.’s Opp’n, Brown Dep. at 66.
Cited 21 timesPublishedGration v. Islamic Republic of Iran
District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2023
G (Stoneburner’s Medical Board Report), H (Stoneburner’s VA Rating Decision Letter) 25. … Kowalczyk Decl. ¶ 25; V. Oliver Decl. ¶¶ 17–18. 16 See B. Brown Decl. ¶ 22; A. Brown Decl. ¶ 20; S. Byers Decl. ¶ 19; T. Fermanis Decl. ¶ 21; K. Mall Decl. ¶¶ 15, 24; R. Gering Decl. ¶ 17; A.
Cited 0 timesPublishedGeo Specialty Chemicals, Incorporated v. Husisian
951 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 2013
Smith v. Washington, 593 F.2d 1097, 1099 (D.C. Cir. 1978) (quoting Hunt v. Wash. State Apple Adver. … See, e.g., Brown v. District of Columbia Board ofZoning Adjustment, 486 A.2d 37 (D.C. 1984) (en bane); TC. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Brothers Pictures, 113 F.
Cited 9 timesPublishedBrotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Southern Railway Co.
217 F. Supp. 58 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 1963
This task is for the Adjustment Board in accordance with the procedures of the Act and in order to effectively utilize the expertise possessed by the members of the Board. As the Supreme Court stated in Slocum v. … In Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v.
Cited 10 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Oct 16, 2020
transit the United States” or that “he plans in the relatively near future to board a flight that would transit U.S. airspace”). … DATE: October 16, 2020 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Cited 0 timesPublished935 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2013
In Rempfer v. AFBCMR, Judge Robertson vacated and remanded a denial of a records correction request because the Board did not consider the effect of Doe. 538 F. Supp. 2d at 210. … In fact, the Court finds that the Board for Correction’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. See Kight v. U.S., 850 F.
Cited 15 timesPublished64 F. Supp. 3d 33 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2014
Cone v. Caldera, 223 F.3d 789, 793 (D.C. Cir. 2000). The district court is not to function as a “super correction board.” Charette v. Walker, 996 F. Supp. 43, 50 (D.D.C. 1998). … Ct. at 438 (citing Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 748 (1970)). Defendant argues that the Board applied the correct standard, citing Warren v. United States, 41 F. App’x 408 (Fed. Cir. 2002).
Cited 3 timesPublishedPerales v. Office of the Clerk
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 2026
See, e.g., Brown v. WMATA, 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2016) (dismissing a complaint sua sponte for failing to comply with Rule 8(a)); Hamrick v. United States, No. 10-cv-857, 2010 WL 3324721, at *1 (D.D.C. … See Brown, 164 F. Supp. 3d at 35. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.
Cited 0 timesPublished246 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 2007
Laxalt v. McClatchy, 809 F.2d 885, 889 (D.C.Cir.1987). . … See Kalinoski v.
Cited 1 timesPublished538 F. Supp. 2d 152 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 2008
E.g., Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d 703, 705-06 (D.C.Cir.1986). … E.g., Brown v. Barnhart, 408 F.Supp.2d 28, 32 (D.D.C.2006) (citation omitted).
Cited 10 timesPublishedBrotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
237 F. Supp. 404 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 1964
Board 282 Interpretation, B.R.T. Question No. 23, September 16, 1964. 49 . See Radio Corporation v. United States, 341 U.S. 412, 420 , 71 S.Ct. 806 , 95 L.Ed. 1062 (1951); National Broadcasting Co. v. … Board 282 Interpretation, B.R.T. Question No. 11, June 9, 1964. 73 . See Avery v. Alabama, supra note 64; National Labor Relations Bd. v. Somerville Buick, supra note 64 ; Locke v.
Reversed on other grounds by Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company (Lines East), 345 F.2d 985 (1965)Cited 6 timesPublished444 F. Supp. 245 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 1977
Co. v. United States, 130 F.Supp. 333 (Ct.Cl.1955); Baltimore & Ohio Ry. Co. v. United States, supra; Boehm v. United States, supra; Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. … See Carter v. Seamans, supra at 773-75; McClendon v. Blout, supra at 383; Mathis v. Laird, supra at 943-44.
Cited 21 timesPublishedCorporation for Public Broadcasting v. Trump
District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 2025
Kelley v. … officials); Schlafly v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDorsey v. Government of the District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 2, 2010
Council member Michael Brown. Id. at 3. B. … Council member Michael Brown] according to the Freedom of Information Act of the District of Columbia”).
Cited 0 timesPublished160 F. Supp. 3d 215 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 2016
See Remmie v. Mabus, 846 F. … Sierra Club v. Jackson, 648 F.3d 848, 854 (D.C.
Cited 3 timesPublishedChavous v. District of Columbia Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance Authority
201 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 2001
Petrus v. Bowen, 833 F.2d 581, 583 (5th Cir.1987) (citations omitted); see Ladd v. Equicredit Corp. of Am., No. CIV.A. 00-2688, 2001 WL 175236 , at *1 (E.D.La. Feb. 21, 2001); White v. … contract the Control Board entered with Greater Southeast (Count Three). .
Cited 52 timesPublished839 F. Supp. 2d 75 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 2012
Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 415 (1971), abrogated on other grounds by Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 (1977). … the final Board decision and not the underlying personnel action.4 Finally, Brigadier General Schwalier relies on Lebrun v.
Cited 4 timesPublished78 F. Supp. 3d 148 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2015
Occidental Eng'g Co. v. … Rudo v. Geren, 818 F.
Cited 16 timesPublished
Ask Donna