Case law

Barry v. Trustees of the International Ass'n Full-Time Salaried Officers & Employees of Outside Local Unions

404 F. Supp. 2d 145 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 2005

(“ULLICO”) and its directors Morton Bahr, James LaSala, Martin Maddaloni, William Bernard, Marvin Bode, Kenneth Brown, John T. … Co. v.

Upmc Mercy v. Serbelius

793 F. Supp. 2d 62 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2011

SEC v. … Fund, Inc. v.

COMMITTEE TO DEFEND US CONST. v. Moon

776 F. Supp. 568 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 1991

In Estate of Grant v. U.S. … See United Mine Workers v.

Strunk v. United States Department of Commerce Bureau of the Census

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2010

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Brown, S.J." as his opposition to the motion to dismiss [#10] filed on behalf of Maryland Province of the Society of Jesus and Timothy B.

New York Republican State Committee v. Securities and Exchange Commission

70 F. Supp. 3d 362 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2014

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … .”); Brown v. Gardner, 513 U.S. 115, 121 (1994) (“[C]ongressional silence lacks persuasive significance" (internal quotation marks omitted)); Girouard v.

Cross v. Samper

501 F. Supp. 2d 59 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2007

Brown v. Gen. Services Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 829 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). Any of Mr. … Bush v.

Larsen v. Hoffman

444 F. Supp. 245 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 1977

Co. v. United States, 130 F.Supp. 333 (Ct.Cl.1955); Baltimore & Ohio Ry. Co. v. United States, supra; Boehm v. United States, supra; Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. … See Carter v. Seamans, supra at 773-75; McClendon v. Blout, supra at 383; Mathis v. Laird, supra at 943-44.

Booth v. District of Columbia

701 F. Supp. 2d 73 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2010

See Holcomb v. Powell, 433 F.3d 889, 901 (D.C.Cir.2006). … (Pl.’s Opp’n [# 59] Ex. 3, Brown Affidavit ¶ 7.)

Nihiser v. White

211 F. Supp. 2d 125 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 2002

In Klehr v. A.O. … Secondly, the Army’s decision to review the results of the 1992 RIF board for a second time appears to be committed exclusively to the discretion of the Army. Cf. Chaney v.

United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.

241 F. Supp. 3d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 2017

Barko v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 135 S. Ct. 1163 (2015); U.S. ex rel. Barko v. Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 136 S. Ct. 823 (2016). III. LEGAL STANDARDS A. … In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 764 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (KBR 1) (quoting Upjohn Co. v.

Corporation for Public Broadcasting v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 2025

Kelley v. … officials); Schlafly v.

Furtado v. Furtado

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 8, 2025

See, e.g., Brown v. WMATA, 164 F. Supp. 3d 33, 35 (D.D.C. 2016) (dismissing a complaint sua sponte for failing to comply with Rule 8(a)); see also Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–69 (D.C. … Brown, 164 F. Supp. 3d at 35. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion.

Schwalier v. Panetta

839 F. Supp. 2d 75 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 2012

Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 415 (1971), abrogated on other grounds by Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99 (1977). … the final Board decision and not the underlying personnel action.4 Finally, Brigadier General Schwalier relies on Lebrun v.

Njang v. Whitestone Group, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 2, 2013

Ci v. P. 16(f). (ECF No. 10.) Defendant subsequently filed its own Motion for Sanctions, asking the Court to dismiss the case pursuant to Fed R. Civ. … Date: August 2, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Albino v. United States

78 F. Supp. 3d 148 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2015

Occidental Eng'g Co. v. … Rudo v. Geren, 818 F.

Gration v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2023

G (Stoneburner’s Medical Board Report), H (Stoneburner’s VA Rating Decision Letter) 25. … Kowalczyk Decl. ¶ 25; V. Oliver Decl. ¶¶ 17–18. 16 See B. Brown Decl. ¶ 22; A. Brown Decl. ¶ 20; S. Byers Decl. ¶ 19; T. Fermanis Decl. ¶ 21; K. Mall Decl. ¶¶ 15, 24; R. Gering Decl. ¶ 17; A.

Scottsdale Capital Advisors Corporation v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 2019

First, the composition of its board. … Brown v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 833 (1976); see also Brooks v. District of Columbia, 375 F. Supp. 3d 41, 45 (D.D.C. 2019) (“Plaintiffs’ crafty pleading cannot hide the true nature of their claims.

Geo Specialty Chemicals, Incorporated v. Husisian

951 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 2013

Smith v. Washington, 593 F.2d 1097, 1099 (D.C. Cir. 1978) (quoting Hunt v. Wash. State Apple Adver. … See, e.g., Brown v. District of Columbia Board ofZoning Adjustment, 486 A.2d 37 (D.C. 1984) (en bane); TC. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Brothers Pictures, 113 F.

Baisden v. Barr

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 16, 2020

transit the United States” or that “he plans in the relatively near future to board a flight that would transit U.S. airspace”). … DATE: October 16, 2020 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Stephens v. US Airways Group

555 F. Supp. 2d 112 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 20, 2008

Aktieselskabet, 525 F.3d at 17 n. 4; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). “A complaint needs some information about the circumstances giving rise to the claims.” Aktieselskabet, 525 F.3d at 17 n. 4. … Alexander v.