Case law

Hyman v. Coe

146 F. Supp. 24 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 1956

Rago, 120 Conn. 287 , 180 A. 444, 446 ; Coleman v. Board of Appeals, 281 Mass. 112 , 183 N.E. 166 . Such a board is “required to act judicially on facts lawfully ascertained.” Robinson v. … Robinson v. Town Council of Narragansett, and Berard v. Board of Adjustment of City of St.

In re Gianasmidis

318 F. Supp. 3d 442 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2018

Food & Drug Admin. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. , 529 U.S. 120 , 133, 120 S.Ct. 1291 , 146 L.Ed.2d 121 (2000) (quoting Davis v. … Rake v.

Law Offices of Jerris Leonard v. Mideast Systems, Ltd.

111 F.R.D. 359 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 27, 1986

The facts in Brown are relevant here. In Brown , a lawyer agreed to perform legal work and to join in an investment venture with parties named McCormick. … Brown, supra, 608 F.2d at 416 . . Mr.

National ATM Council, Inc. v. Visa Inc.

922 F. Supp. 2d 73 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 2013

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Its representation on the MasterCard board ended in 2003, and its representation on the Visa board ended in 2006. Id. Wells Fargo was represented on the companies’ boards “[d]uring parts of the relevant time period.”

United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.

4 F. Supp. 3d 161 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 21, 2014

GWIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: In this qui tam action, Defendants Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., KBR Technical Services, Inc., Kellogg, Brown & Root Engineering Corporation, Kellogg, Brown & Root International … See Johnson v. Greater Se. Cmty. Hosp. Corp., 951 F.2d 1268, 1277–78 (D.C.Cir.1991). -2-

Robinson v. Pezzat

83 F. Supp. 3d 258 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2015

See, e.g., Viilo v. Eyre, 547 F.3d 707, 710 (7th Cir.2008); San Jose Charter of the Hells Angels Motorcycle Club v. City of San Jose, 402 F.3d 962, 975 (9th Cir.2005); Brown v. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 638 F.Supp. 1479, 1488 (D.D.C.1986).

Texas Neighborhood Services v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

172 F. Supp. 3d 236 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2016

Will v. Mich. Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989); see also Kentucky v. … Alliance v. U.S.

Byers v. United States Tax Court

211 F. Supp. 3d 240 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2016

That entity, known as the Board of Tax Appeals (the “Board”), was created as “an independent agency in the executive branch of the Government.” Revenue Act *242 of 1924, Pub. L. … Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (reversing the district court because it failed to consider allegations found in a pro se plaintiffs opposition to a motion to dismiss). IV.

District of Columbia Hospital Ass'n v. District of Columbia

73 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 1999

Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94 (1980). Res Judicata does not, however, bar a party or parties from relitigating a previously asserted claim dismissed on justiciability grounds. Cutler v. … Brown’s. Ms.

Baptist Healthcare of Oklahoma, LLC v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2025

C., Inc. v. … Ctr. v.

Nader v. Allegheny Airlines, Inc.

445 F. Supp. 168 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 1978

British Airways Board v. Taylor, 1 All E.R. 65 (House of Lords 1976). … And, the following year in Knippen v.

Old Kent Bank & Trust Co. v. Martin

172 F. Supp. 951 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 1959

The Board refused to approve the operation by plaintiff of the additional branches on the ground that this would probably have an adverse effect upon competition in the Grand Rapids area. … It is this; act of increasing the number of branches that requires prior approval by the Board.

Fuller v. Alexander

440 F. Supp. 380 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 1977

See Colm v. Kissinger, 406 F.Supp. 1250 (D.D.C.1975) and Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274 , 97 S.Ct. 568 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471 (1977). … Knehans v.

United States v. Hoover-Hankerson

406 F. Supp. 2d 76 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2005

Brown would see Hoover with Robinson when Robinson handed Brown vouchers and when Brown turned over some of the proceeds. Brown heard Hoover referred to as “Ben.” … and Marvin Brown, and that Taylor, Antonio Brown and Marvin Brown each received their vouchers from either Robinson or Hoover.

Caudle v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

676 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 23, 1987

Those charges were ultimately rejected by the ALPA Appeals Board on August 9, 1984. II. … See Price v. International Union, 795 F.2d 1128 , 1135-36 (2d Cir.1986) (affirming grant of summary judgment in duty of fair representation case); Brown v. Trans World Airlines, 746 F.2d 1354, 1358-60 (8th Cir.1984).

Tripati v. Williams

759 F. Supp. 3 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 1990

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C.1977) (citing 2A Moore, Federal Practice 118.13; 5 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1217). … Joseph v. Cannon, 642 F.2d 1373, 1385 (D.C.Cir.1981) (quoting 2A J. Moore, Federal Practice ¶ 9.03 at 9-20 to 9-24 (2d ed. 1980)).

Di Lella v. University of the District of Columbia David A. Clarke School of Law

570 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2008

Brown v. Nat’l Acad. of Scis., 844 A.2d 1113, 1118 (D.C.2004) (quoting Delaware State Coll. v. Ricks, 449 U.S. 250, 258 , 101 S.Ct. 498 , 66 L.Ed.2d 431 (1980)). … Board of Curators of Univ. of Missouri v. Horowitz, 435 U.S. 78, 85 , 98 S.Ct. 948 , 55 L.Ed.2d 124 (1978) *10 (quoting Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 581 , 95 S.Ct. 729 , 42 L.Ed.2d 725 (1975)).

Barry v. Trustees of the International Ass'n Full-Time Salaried Officers & Employees of Outside Local Unions

404 F. Supp. 2d 145 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 2005

(“ULLICO”) and its directors Morton Bahr, James LaSala, Martin Maddaloni, William Bernard, Marvin Bode, Kenneth Brown, John T. … Co. v.

COMMITTEE TO DEFEND US CONST. v. Moon

776 F. Supp. 568 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 1991

In Estate of Grant v. U.S. … See United Mine Workers v.

Cross v. Samper

501 F. Supp. 2d 59 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2007

Brown v. Gen. Services Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 829 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). Any of Mr. … Bush v.