Case law

Lewis v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2024

First, he alleges that V. Wilson and Lora Brown, Department of Education employees, acted wrongfully by claiming that his loans had not been discharged by his 2005 bankruptcy. Id. at 42–45. … Wilson and Brown.

Fritch v. U.S. Department of State

220 F. Supp. 3d 51 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2016

Inc. v. Thompson, 269 F.3d 1077, 1083 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (citing cases). “[T]he court’s review is limited to the administrative record,” Fund for Animals v. Babbitt, 903 F. Supp. 96, 105 (D.D.C. 1995) (citing Camp v. … to its earlier decisions, the court has jurisdiction to review the Board’s decision on that narrow ground, see Jicarilla Apache Nation v.

In re Brown

68 F.R.D. 172 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 17, 1975

This Court summarily denied Brown’s petition in August of last year, but Brown then motioned for reconsideration of the summary denial, and this Court granted his motion. … Lafferty v. District of Columbia, 107 U.S. App.D.C. 318, 277 F.2d 348 , n. 6 at 351 (1960).

Fisher v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

151 F. Supp. 3d 159 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 2016

PBGC v. R.A. Gray & Co., 467 U.S. 717, 720 (1984) (quoting Nachman Corp. v. PBGC, 446 U.S. 359, 361–62 (1980)). … Gonzales, 546 U.S. at 256 (quoting Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 (1944)). And under Auer v.

Deskins v. Barry

729 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 1989

Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984); Josiah-Faeduwor v. Communications Satellite Corp. 785 F.2d 344 (D.C.Cir.1986). … See, e.g., Patsy v. Board of Regents of the State of Florida, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982); Gilliam v. City of Omaha, 459 F.2d 63 (8th Cir.1972); Blake v.

Rendall-Speranza v. Nassim

932 F. Supp. 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 1996

See, e.g., Brown v. … Georgia Dept. of Revenue, 881 F.2d 1018 (11th Cir.1989) (former state employee properly permitted to amend civil rights complaint to add individual members of State Personnel board when board was served with original complaint

Carroll v. Tobriner

253 F. Supp. 87 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 1966

From a review of the entire record, particularly the testimony of the psychiatrist member of the Police and Firemen’s Retirement Board, Dr. … In Blohm v.

Payne v. District of Columbia

773 F. Supp. 2d 89 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2011

Brown v. … Brown v.

Wilhelmus v. Geren

796 F. Supp. 2d 157 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 2011

Baker v. … This case is, accordingly, remanded to the Board so that it may consider the applicability of case AR200309457 in reaching its decision here. See, e.g., Kendall v.

United States v. Zabavsky

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 16, 2022

Hylton-Brown on October 23, 2020.” United States v. Sutton, 2022 WL 2828995, at *3. … Hylton-Brown.” United States v. Sutton, 2022 WL 13940371, at *19. Mr. Wear may provide testimony on whether Mr.

Auburn Regional Medical Center v. Sebelius

686 F. Supp. 2d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2010

Defendant contends that § 1395oo(f) limits judicial review to a “final decision of the Board,” and that under Athens Comm. Hosp. v. … Hosp. v.

Brehm v. Marocco

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 10, 2025

See Collins v. … See NLRB v.

LESTER E. COX MEDICAL CENTERS v. Sebelius

691 F. Supp. 2d 162 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2010

Id. at § 1395ww(d)(5)(F)(v). … See High Country Home Health, Inc. v.

State of SC v. United States

585 F. Supp. 418 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 26, 1984

Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 , 64 S.Ct. 757 , 88 L.Ed. 987 (1944); Baskin v. Brown, 174 F.2d 391 (4th Cir.1949); and Rice v. … See also MacGuire v. Amos, 343 F.Supp. 119, 121 (M.D.Ala.1972); Wilson v. North Carolina State Board of Elections, 317 F.Supp. at 1302-03 .

Wilkerson v. Wackenhut Protective Services, Inc.

813 F. Supp. 2d 61 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2011

See Jameson v. Jameson, 176 F.2d 58, 60 (D.C. … s Reply at 14; McKennon v.

Monroe v. Williams

705 F. Supp. 621 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1988

In Bricker v. … In Brown v.

Elghannam v. National Association of Boards of Pharmacy

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 2016

Circuit recently held that a district court must consider together all allegations that pro se plaintiffs make in their pleadings—including oppositions—when resolving a motion to dismiss, see Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151 (D.C. Cir. 2015). “The standard for dismissing a complaint with prejudice is high,” Belizan v. Herson, 434 F.3d 579, 583 (D.C.

Reed v. ALLIEDBARTON SECURITY SERVICES, LLC

583 F. Supp. 2d 92 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 2008

(quoting Dixon v. Coburg Dairy, Inc., 369 F.3d 811, 815-16 (4th Cir.2004) (en banc)). See also Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M. St. … See Johnson-Brown, 257 F.Supp.2d at 177 . See also Nat’l Org. for Women v. Mut. of Omaha Ins.

Health v. Price

243 F. Supp. 3d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2017

Ctr. v. Burwell, 139 F.Supp.3d 240, 244-45 (D.D.C. 2015). … Arpaio v. Obama, 797 F.3d 11, 19 (D.C. Cir. 2015).

Flying Tiger Line, Inc. v. Boyd

244 F. Supp. 889 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 14, 1965

This contention is, however, foreclosed by a decision of the Court of Appeals for this Circuit in Flying Tiger Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 92 U.S.App. D.C. 260, 204 F.2d 404 . … may be properly invoked, Capitol Airways, Inc., v.