Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

4.80s

  • Ludlow v. Mabus

    793 F. Supp. 2d 352 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2011

    LEGAL STANDARD Decisions of the military review boards are, like other federal agency action, subject to review under the APA, Frizelle v. … Bioscience, Inc. v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Jackson v. District of Columbia

    710 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 20, 1989

    This failure perhaps derives from their citation to Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1244 (D.C.App.1986), as controlling authority for this case. … In Dellums v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Singhal

    800 F. Supp. 2d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2010

    Furthermore, he asserts that pursuant to United States v. … Boca Investerings P’ship v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Whittaker v. Munoz

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 4, 2019

    See Atwater v. … Brown, 460 U.S. 730, 742 (1983).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Fouch v. District of Columbia

    10 F. Supp. 3d 45 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 2014

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Rogers v. Boatright, 709 F.3d 403 (5th Cir. 2013); Brown v. Fornter, 518 F.3d 552 (8th Cir. 2008).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Teles Ag v. Kappos

    846 F. Supp. 2d 102 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 2012

    See FDA v. … v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Beckford v. United States

    950 F. Supp. 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 10, 1997

    See, for example, Williams v. Baker, 572 A.2d 1062 (D.C.1990); District of Columbia v. Cooper, 483 A.2d 317, 321 (D.C.1984). … Mitchell, 533 A.2d at 629 ; District of Columbia v. Brown, 589 A.2d 384, 387 (D.C.1991).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Voegeli v. Phelan

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 2025

    Saint-Fleur v. McHugh, 83 F. … Corp. v. Sebelius, 14 903 F. Supp. 2d 39, 58–59 n.10 (D.D.C. 2012). No doubt “the Board’s reasoning could . . . be clearer and more thorough.” McKinney v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Thorne v. Cavazos

    744 F. Supp. 348 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 31, 1990

    Brown v. Hartshorne Public School Dist. No. 1, 864 F.2d 680, 682 (10th Cir.1988) (citing Kirkland v. Buffalo Bd. of Educ., 622 F.2d 1066, 1068 (2d Cir.1980); Gottlieb v. … The Davis Court also reaffirmed its earlier holding in Brown v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Daniel ex rel. M.H. v. District of Columbia

    174 F. Supp. 3d 532 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2016

    Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, 80 F.Supp.3d 90, 99 (D.D.C.2015); Hensley, 461 U.S. at 435 n. 11, 103 S.Ct. 1933 . … See Dist. of Columbia v. Doe, 611 F.3d 888, 890 (D.C.Cir.2010). . Plaintiffs’ invoice reflects work done by oth- ' er individuals, including other Brown & Associates attorneys and 'an educational advocate. Pi.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • United States v. McFadden

    722 F. Supp. 807 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 1989

    In Terry v. … See e.g., Peters v. New York, decided together with Sibron v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Griffith v. Barnes

    560 F. Supp. 2d 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2008

    Brown (“Brown”) (collectively “Defendants”) engaged in a predatory loan scheme whereby they fraudulently took title to Griffith’s house and re-sold it without her knowledge. … Duggan v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Clayton v. District of Columbia

    117 F. Supp. 3d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 2015

    Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp. Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (citation omitted). Although “detailed factual allegations” are not necessary, Bell Atl. Corp. v. … See, e.g., Brown v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 603 F.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Henderson

    150 F. Supp. 2d 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2001

    See Williams-Guice v. Board of Ed., 45 F.3d 161, 162 (7th Cir.1995); McCall v. United States Marshals Service, 36 F.Supp.2d 3, 5 (D.D.C.1999). In this case, the plaintiff had seven days remaining from March 7, 2000. … See Baldwin County Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Murphy v. Wormuth

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2025

    P. 56(a); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). … Therefore, “a challenge to military board of corrections decision must be filed within six years of an adverse review board decision.” Jackson v. Spencer, 313 F. Supp. 3d 302, 309 (D.D.C. 2018).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lebidine v. Del Toro

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2025

    In reviewing a determination by a military corrections board, the court accords the board great deference. Powers v. Donley, 844 F. Supp. 2d 65, 70 (D.D.C. 2012); Kreis v. … Wallace, 462 U.S. 296, 302 (1983) and Clinton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Garnes El v. District of Columbia

    841 F. Supp. 2d 116 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2012

    Board of Comm’rs of Bryan City v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 409 (1997). 20 Plaintiff in the instant case has offered no such proof. … Dillard, 647 F.Supp.2d 43 (D.D.C. 2009) nor Brown v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Hobson v. Hansen

    5 A.L.R. Fed. 497 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 1968

    While petitioners may disagree with the Board’s policy-making, they do not allege that the Board has abused or acted beyond its statutory authority. In Blocker v. … In Wolpe v.

    Cited 73 timesPublished
  • Wallish v. United States Department of Defense

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 2025

    Perez v. Mortg. Bankers Ass’n, 575 U.S. 92, 102 (2015) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Nat. Res. Def. … See Gubera v. Austin, et al., 1:23-cv-01425, Joint Proposed Order, ECF No. 12 (D.D.C., July 24, 2023); Sines v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hodgson v. United Mine Workers of America

    344 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 1972

    Trbovich v. United Mine Workers of America, 404 U.S. 528 , 92 S.Ct. 630 , 30 L.Ed.2d 686 (1972), and he thereafter fully participated in this action, through counsel, as a party plaintiff. … The results of the election were: for president, Boyle 80,577, Yablonski 46,073; for vice-president, Titler 77,379, Elmer Brown 45,151; for secretary-treasurer, Owens 102,346. Owens had been unopposed for reelection.

    Cited 35 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.