Case law

Harper v. Bessent

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2025

See Trump v. Wilcox, 145 S. … Sys. v. Dimension Fin.

Vasquez v. Wormuth

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2025

FEC v. Akins, 524 U.S. 11, 25 (1998). Courts have done precisely that in response to flawed decisions by military correction boards. See, e.g., Penland v. Mabus, 181 F. … The Kurta Memo requires the Board to liberally consider veterans’ requests to modify their discharges because of PTSD. See Fisher v. United States, 402 F.3d 1167, 1177 (Fed.

Benson v. Sebelius

771 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2011

After considering the plaintiffs case, the review board upheld CMS’s demand for $25,868.58. Id. … v.

Banneker Ventures, LLC v. Graham

253 F. Supp. 3d 64 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 2017

FTC v. TRW, Inc., 628 F.2d 207, 213 (D.C. … See SEC v. Lavin, 111 F.3d 921, 929 (D.C. Cir. 1997).

Merit Health River Region v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2025

Corp. v. Sebelius, 657 F.3d 1, 2 (D.C. Cir. 2011). … Inova Alexandria Hosp. v. Shalala, 244 F.3d 342, 351 (4th Cir. 2001) (citing Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of the United States v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

Johnson v. District of Columbia

572 F. Supp. 2d 94 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2008

Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 455 U.S. 385, 393 , 102 S.Ct. 1127 , 71 L.Ed.2d 234 (1982); Brown v. Marsh, 111 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.Cir.1985). … Evans, 275 F.3d 1126, 1134 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999)); Mitchell v. Yates, 402 F.Supp.2d 222, 229-30 (D.D.C.2005).

Harrah v. United States Treasury Department

503 F. Supp. 2d 385 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 5, 2007

Pending before the Court is [6] Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, which was filed by the United States Treasury Department and the Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. … Erickson v. Pardus, — U.S. -, -, 127 S.Ct. 2197, 2200 , 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, — U.S.-,-, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1964 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (internal quotation marks omitted)).

United States v. Zabavsky

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 2022

Hylton-Brown’s death. Sutton Opp. at 16; see also United States v. … United States v. Brown, 503 F. Supp. 2d 239, 243 (D.D.C. 2007).

Iweala v. Operational Technologies Services, Inc.

634 F. Supp. 2d 73 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2009

See Carney v. Am. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999) (internal quotation marks omitted).

Dave v. Lanier

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 2010

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Dickens v. District of Columbia

502 F. Supp. 2d 90 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 22, 2007

Department of Corrections, United States Parole Board, CSX, and named and un-named individual defendants. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). A complaint must present “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,” and “above the speculative level.” Bell Atlantic Corp. v.

Beatty v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 2026

Nken v. … .”); Cabaniss v.

Augustus v. Locke

699 F. Supp. 2d 65 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2010

Instead, the Court concludes this court’s decision in Brown v. … See Saksenasingh v.

Sanders v. Veneman

131 F. Supp. 2d 225 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 2001

In Brown , the D.C. … In Brown , the D.C.

Fouch v. District of Columbia

10 F. Supp. 3d 45 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 2014

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Rogers v. Boatright, 709 F.3d 403 (5th Cir. 2013); Brown v. Fornter, 518 F.3d 552 (8th Cir. 2008).

COMMITTEE TO DEFEND US CONST. v. Moon

776 F. Supp. 568 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 1991

In Estate of Grant v. U.S. … See United Mine Workers v.

O'BOYLE v. Coe

155 F. Supp. 581 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 1957

Selden v. Capitol Hill Southeast Citizens Association, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 62 , 219 F.2d 33 ; American University v. Prentiss, D.C., 113 F.Supp. 389 , affirmed 94 U.S.App. D.C. 204, 214 F.2d 282 . … E.g. in Montgomery County v.

Harris v. Attorney General of the United States

657 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 24, 2009

For this reason and because Browning-Ferris “is not terribly distinct from the primary consideration in the Spirides test,” Dean v. Am. … See Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.Cir.1985) (“[T]he administrative deadlines [of Title VII] are not jurisdictional.

Cross v. Samper

501 F. Supp. 2d 59 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2007

Brown v. Gen. Services Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 829 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). Any of Mr. … Bush v.

Connors v. Hi-Heat Coal Co., Inc.

772 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 24, 1991

See, e.g., Board of Trustees v. Lafrenz, 837 F.2d 892, 894 (9th Cir.1988). … But see Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. v.