Case law

Nelson v. Bernhardt

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 29, 2019

) DAVID LEE NELSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: July 29, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Millhouse v. Del Toro

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2025

Laborers’ Pension Fund v. … See, e.g., Penland v. Mabus, 181 F. Supp. 3d 100, 106 (D.D.C. 2016) (remanding case to the Board for Correction of Naval Records).

Barnwell Enterprises Ltd v. Emerging Capital Partners

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 2017

After acquiring these shares, ECP Africa appointed four in- dividuals to Spencon’s board of directors: Carolyn Campbell, Bryce Fort, Andrew Brown, and Namita Shah. Id. at 22. … ’s Board of Directors. 6.

Martin v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 1, 2023

First Brown Decl. ¶ 17. … Brown (ECF No. 31-1) ¶ 6.

Novant Health Presbyterian Hospital v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 2025

§ 1395ww(d)(5)(F)(v); Cath. Health, 718 F.3d at 916. … Ctr. v. Azar, 836 F. App’x 13, 15–16 (D.C. Cir. 2021); see also UHI, Inc. v.

Calloway v. Harvey

590 F. Supp. 2d 29 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 4, 2008

Judicial review of the final decision of the Army Board is limited to a determination of whether the board’s decision “is arbitrary and capricious, contrary to law, or unsupported by substantial evidence.” Frizelle v. … Corp. v.

Ferguson v. Long

885 F. Supp. 2d 294 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 16, 2012

Cohen v. United States, 650 F.3d 717, 723 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (quoting FDIC v. Meyer, 510 U.S. 471, 475 (1994) (citing Loeffler v. Frank, 486 U.S. 549, 554 (1988), and Federal Housing Administration v. … Office of Personnel Management v.

Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. Cafesjian

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2009

AGM&M is governed by a Board of Trustees who serve as the Board of Directors of AGM&M. Id. ¶ 12. Defendant Waters, Jr. is CFF’s representative member on AGM&M’s Board of Trustees. Id. ¶¶ 16, 17, 19. … Brown v. Collins, 402 F.2d 209, 212 & n. 4 (D.C. Cir. 1968). 17 See Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc., No. 06-670, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3197 at *53 n.9 (D.D.C.

Sykes v. Chertoff

District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 2010

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999); see also Stewart v. Evans, 275 F.3d 1126, 1134 (D.C. … See, e.g., Simms v. U.S. GPO, 87 F.

Bartel v. Federal Aviation Administration

617 F. Supp. 190 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 18, 1985

Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1969 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976); Kizas v. Webster, 707 F.2d 524, 542 (D.C.Cir.1983); Davis v. … See Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748 , 96 S.Ct. 1817 , 48 L.Ed.2d 346 (1976); Paton v. LaPrade, 524 F.2d 862 (3d Cir.1975). 17 . Houchins v.

Jarrott v. Scrivener

225 F. Supp. 827 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 28, 1964

As stated in National Labor Relations Board v. … In United Air Lines, Inc. v. C. A.

Old Kent Bank & Trust Co. v. Martin

172 F. Supp. 951 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 1959

The Board refused to approve the operation by plaintiff of the additional branches on the ground that this would probably have an adverse effect upon competition in the Grand Rapids area. … It is this; act of increasing the number of branches that requires prior approval by the Board.

Barrera v. United States Department of Homeland Security

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 11, 2022

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). When reviewing a challenge under Rule 12(b)(1), “the court may consider documents outside the pleadings to assure itself that it has jurisdiction,” Sandoval v. … If that is correct, he should have submitted his adjustment application to an immigration judge, appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals, and then “to the relevant circuit court of appeals.” See Jafarzadeh v.

G.B. v. District of Columbia

78 F. Supp. 3d 109 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 14, 2015

MEMORANDUM OPINION (January 14, 2015) Plaintiffs Joseph Brown and Jennifer Brown filed suit as the parents and next friends of their minor daughter, G.B., against the District … Cir. 1984) (quoting Concerned Parents v. New York City Board of Education, 629 F.2d 751 (2d Cir. 1980)); see also id.

Caudle v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.

676 F. Supp. 314 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 23, 1987

Those charges were ultimately rejected by the ALPA Appeals Board on August 9, 1984. II. … See Price v. International Union, 795 F.2d 1128 , 1135-36 (2d Cir.1986) (affirming grant of summary judgment in duty of fair representation case); Brown v. Trans World Airlines, 746 F.2d 1354, 1358-60 (8th Cir.1984).

Palmer v. Shultz

662 F. Supp. 1551 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 1987

v. … See, Bazemore v.

Rodriguez v. Del Toro

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 2026

Gilligan v. Morgan, 413 U.S. 1, 10 (1973) (emphasis omitted); see also Orloff v. … At most, the Court could remand the matter to the Board if it finds that the Board failed to follow the APA. See Palisades Gen. Hosp. Inc. v. Leavitt, 426 F.3d 400, 403 (D.C.

Connecticut Light and Power Company v. Leedom

174 F. Supp. 171 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 1959

American Federation of Labor v. National Labor Relations Board, 1939, 308 U.S. 401 , 60 S.Ct. 300 , 84 L.Ed. 347 . … Elm City Broadcasting Corp. v. N.L.R.B., D.C.Conn.1954, 123 F.Supp. 838 ; Brisbois v. Hague, D.C.Mass.1949, 85 F. Supp. 13 ; White v. Douds, D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1948, 80 F.Supp. 402 ; White v.

Mills Peninsula Health Services v. Becerra

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 10, 2025

Council, Inc. v. SEC, 606 F.2d 1031, 1055-56 (D.C. Cir. 1979). … The Providers therefore cannot show that the Board’s dismissals were arbitrary and capricious. V.

McGough v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2025

The Naval Discharge Review Board performs this role for the Navy. See Doe v. Emmert, No. 1:23-CV- 13112, 2025 WL 915700, at *1 (D. Mass. … In that decision, the Authority explained in seven terse paragraphs that because the Review Board’s conclusion was “not supported by the 4 Cf. Green v.