Case law

Deutsche Goed-Und Sieber-Scheideanstalt v. Commissioner of Patents

251 F. Supp. 624 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 8, 1966

Reynolds v. Aghnides, 356 F.2d 367 (D.C.Cir. 1966). Judge Smith’s dissenting opinion in Druey cites with approval the decision of Judge Letts in Parker v. … While Parker v. Marzall was not specifically cited, its rationale was applied in the recent decision of this Court in Union Carbide Corporation v.

Hot Shoppes, Inc. v. Clouser

231 F. Supp. 825 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 1964

Saginaw Broadcasting Co. v. FCC, 68 App.D.C. 282, 287 , 96 F.2d 554, 559 (1938), specifically applied to decisions of the Board of Zoning Adjustment, Robey v. … Generally, remand to the Board for further proceedings is appropriate, Robey v. Schwab, supra; Hyman v.

United States v. Dyce

842 F. Supp. 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1993

Dyce’s bag produced a brown paper bag wrapped in a white tee shirt. Inside the paper bag he found three plastic bags containing what was later found to be approximately 197 grams of crack cocaine. … See Florida v.

Reynolds v. Swilly

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 20, 2016

Furthermore, because these constitutional claims were brought or could have been brought in plaintiff’s prior lawsuit, see Reynolds v. Brown, No. 4:15-cv—865, 2015 WL 4077168 (D.S.C. … Brown . . . and Kimberly V. Barr . . . , and Sumter County Solicitor Ernest A. Finney III”), adopted, 2015 WL 4078552 (D.S.C. June 30, 2015), the claims are now barred.

Sheppard v. District of Columbia

791 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 2011

Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Roberts v. Harvey

441 F. Supp. 2d 111 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2006

See generally White v. … Assistance Corp. v.

Saint-Fleur v. McHugh

83 F. Supp. 3d 149 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2015

Camp v. … Cir. 2012) (reviewing a military board decision under the standards of the APA and administrative case law); Piersall v. Winter, 435 F.3d. 319, 322 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (same); Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 176 (D.C.

Compton v. Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc.

80 F. Supp. 3d 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 18, 2015

Honig v. Doe, 484 U.S. 305, 317 (1988). … See generally Brown v. Board of Education, 349 U.S. 294, 300 (1955); see also Cobell v. Norton, 240 F.3d 1081, 1108 (D.C.

Petworth Holdings, LLC v. Bowser

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2021

Armstrong v. United States, 364 U.S. 40, 49 (1960). It does not completely prohibit the taking of property, but instead proscribes takings without just compensation. Brown v. … See TRW Inc. v.

Cable News Network, Inc. v. Central Intelligence Agency

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 2023

CNN v. FBI, 384 F. … Vento v. I.R.S., 714 F.

Bossier Parish School Bd. v. Reno

907 F. Supp. 434 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 2, 1995

See Holder v. … Chan v.

National Ass'n of Waterfront Employers v. Chao

587 F. Supp. 2d 90 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302-03 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979).

McDonough v. Stackley

245 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2017

A district court may review the decision of a military board of correction using “familiar principles of administrative law.” Kreis v. Sec’y of the Air Force, 866 F.2d 1508, 1511 (D.C. Cir. 1989); see also Piersall v. … . § 706(2)(A), courts review board decisions under an “unusually deferential” application of that standard. Kreis, 866 F.2d at 1514; Cone v.

Asare v. Loews Hotels

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2014

See Minch v. District of Columbia, 952 A.2d 929, 941-42 (D.C. 2008). As a result, this claim fails. The retaliation claim – pressed only by Brown – is similarly infirm for two reasons. … First, Brown has not sufficiently alleged that he engaged in any protected activity, see Lemmons v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp., 431 F.

Gaines v. District of Columbia

961 F. Supp. 2d 218 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2013

From 1998 to 2012, Gaines met, corresponded, or spoke with employees of the District of Columbia Lottery Board (hereinafter “DCLB”) on a number of occasions. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 919 F. Supp. 2d 105, ___ (D.D.C. 2013) (citing EEOC v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial Sch., 117 F.3d 621, 624 (D.C. Cir. 1997)).

Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n v. United Transportation Union

767 F. Supp. 2d 161 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2011

Brown v. Dorsey & Whitney, LLP, 267 F.Supp.2d 61, 67 (D.D.C.2003) (internal quotation marks omitted); see also Par-Knit Mills, Inc. v. Stockbridge Fabrics Co., 636 F.2d 51 , 54 & n. 9 (3d Cir.1980). … Howsam v.

Alliance for Responsible CFC Policy, Inc. v. Costle

631 F. Supp. 1469 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 7, 1986

Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d 740, 744 (D.C.Cir.1979). 2. Commercial Benefit and Plaintiffs Interest The second and third factors are closely related and often are evaluated together. See Fenster v. … No. 854, at 19; see also Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d at 743-44 ; Cuneo v. Rumsfeld, 553 F.2d at 1368 ; Simon v. United States, 587 F.Supp. at 1032 .

Ransom v. Mayorkas

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2025

The Board’s initial decision became final on September 3, 2020, and Plaintiff was notified of her options for appeal, which included filing a petition for MSPB Board review, a petition with the U.S. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). The motion does not test a plaintiff’s ultimate likelihood of success on the merits, but rather, whether a plaintiff has properly stated a claim.

Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

225 F. Supp. 11 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 1964

As was said by Chief Justice Hughes in Home Building & Loan Association v. … The court based its ruling on Thompson v. Whittier, 365 U.S. 465 , 81 S.Ct. 712 , 5 L.Ed.2d 704 , reversing D.C., 185 F.Supp. 306, 307 ; International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union v.

Hartline v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund

134 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 14, 2000

The minutes of a Board of Trustees meeting reflect that the Board adopted the “home local rate.” (Id. at 12.) … See Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C.1977).