Case law

United States v. Henson

179 F. Supp. 474 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 16, 1959

Brown. Brown was indicted for robbery and the jury returned a verdict of guilty as charged. 1 Several days later, Brown’s mother, Mrs. … United States v. Brown, D.C., 179 F. Supp. 478 . . For a fuller statement, see the petition of the United States Attorney. .

Allen v. Beta Construction

309 F. Supp. 2d 42 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2004

Totten v. … Pogue v.

Horsey v. United States Department of State

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 2016

HORSEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 14-cv-1568 (KBJ) … DATE: October 28, 2016 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Serrano v. Chicken-Out Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2016

) MARIA SERRANO, ) ) PLAINTIFF, ) ) v. … DATE: July 22, 2016 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Weaver v. Gross

605 F. Supp. 210 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 1985

Board of Trustees, 516 F.Supp. 1317, 1324 (N.D.Ill.1981); Rackin v. University of Pennsylvania, 386 F.Supp. 992, 1005-06 (E.D.Pa.1974). … Id. § 1-2556; Brown v. Capitol Hill Club, 425 A.2d 1309, 1312 (D.C.App.1981).

Brunotte v. Tangherlini

892 F. Supp. 2d 199 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2012

Augustus v. McHugh, 825 F. … See Laningham v. United States Navy, 813 F.2d 1236, 1242-43 (D.C. Cir. 1987). Furthermore, the record indicates that GPO only began to consider rescinding Plaintiff's job offer after Mannion contacted Brown.

Banks v. York

515 F. Supp. 2d 89 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 17, 2007

Devon Brown According to plaintiff, defendant Brown failed to house him at CTF, leaving him instead at the D.C. … Brown Mot. at 22-23; Williams Mot. at 21.

Mulhall v. District of Columbia

747 F. Supp. 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 12, 1990

Hall, 856 F.2d at 258 , citing Pickering v. Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1734 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972) [hereinafter “Roth ”]; Hall v. Ford, 856 F.2d at 265 .

Costcommand, LLC v. Prs Software Solutions, Inc.

73 F. Supp. 3d 111 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2014

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002); see also Speelman v. United States, 461 F. Supp. 2d 71, 73 (D.D.C. 2006). … In Hertz Corp. v.

National Ass'n of Letter Carriers v. United States Civil Service Commission

346 F. Supp. 578 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 1972

Robel, 389 U.S. 258 , 88 S.Ct. 419 , 19 L.Ed.2d 508 (1967); Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967). [11] See Roth v. … Board of Regents, supra note 10 , 385 U.S. at 597-604 , 87 S.Ct. 675 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 ; Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360, 366-373 , 84 S.Ct. 1316 , 12 L.Ed.2d 377 (1964); NAACP v.

Gasplus v. United States Department of the Interior

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 6, 2009

Brown-Hruska, 396 F.3d 1168 (D.C. Cir. 2005), to argue that a lack of clear precedent can provide substantial justification for an interpretation which a court later finds erroneous. … Finally, the regulations provide that “[s]ubsequent to a decision by the Board, the record filed with the Board and all documents added during the appeal proceeding, including the Board’s decision, shall be forwarded to

Mitchell v. Yates

402 F. Supp. 2d 222 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 2005

See Brown v. … See Board of Trustees of Univ. of Alabama v. Garrett, 531 U.S. 356, 366 , 121 S.Ct. 955 , 148 L.Ed.2d 866 (2001) (quoting Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432, 446 , 105 S.Ct. 3249 , 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985)).

Plummer v. Bottling Group, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2023

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Brown v. Potomac Elec. Power Co., 306 F. Supp. 3d 194, 199 (D.D.C. 2018) (quoting Lingle v. Norge Div. of Magic Chef, Inc., 486 U.S. 399, 403 (1988)) (second alteration in original).

Horvath v. Thompson

329 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 23, 2004

Brown v. Henderson, 257 F.3d 246, 252 (2d Cir.2001). However, statistical evidence may also be relevant in disparate treatment actions. McDonnell Douglas, 411 U.S. at 804-05 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 ; see also Krodel v. … Settle’s tenure (including ALJs, Board Members, and Division Chiefs), some of whom were men. (Id. at 69, 81; Def.’s Reply, Ex. A [EEOC Hearing Tr.] at 108; Def.’s Mot., Ex. V [Settle Aff] at 3.)

Tate v. Escher

33 F.2d 556 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 1929

Recognizing the duties and authority thus conferred upon the Alien Property Custodian, Congress in the Act of May 16, 1928, 45 Stat. 574 , making appropriations for the executive office and executive bureaus, boards, commissions … United States v. Moore, 95 U. S. 760 , 24 L. Ed. 588 ; Brown v. United States, 113 U. S. 568 , 5 S. Ct. 648 , 28 L. Ed. 1079 ; United States v. Johnston, 124 U. S. 236 , 8 S. Ct. 446 , 31 L. Ed. 389 ; Robertson v.

Pannell v. Protection Strategies Incorporated

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 2022

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … In Dept. of the Navy v. Egan, Mr. Egan sought review of the denial of his security clearance by the Merit Systems Protection Board (“Board”). 484 U.S. 518, 522 (1988).

Beeman v. Middendorf

425 F. Supp. 713 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 1977

Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976), Mandates that the Fifth Amendment Claim be Dismissed. … In asserting that plaintiff’s fifth amendment claim is also barred because Title VII provides her exclusive remedy, defendant relies on the recent case of Brown v.

Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. President of Georgetown College

483 F. Supp. 1142 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 7, 1980

United States v. Seckinger, 397 U.S. 203, 216 , 90 S.Ct. 880, 888 , 25 L.Ed.2d 224 (1970). This canon of construction has been vigorously applied in insurance cases. See Imperial Insurance, Inc. v. … Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 376 F.Supp. 901, 906 (W.D.Okl. 1973).

Saunders v. White

191 F. Supp. 2d 95 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2002

Regarding selection board composition, the instant case presents the same material facts as Ward v. Caldera. … Thus, Saunders’ claims with respect to the 1996 Board’s decision are clearly not moot. Porter v.

Ali v. D.C. Court Services

538 F. Supp. 2d 157 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 2008

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). III. ANALYSIS A. … For example, absolute immunity applies to the acts of parole officers and the acts of government officials taken at the direction of or to assist the parole board. Turner v.