Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

1.32s

  • Thomas v. Principi

    265 F. Supp. 2d 35 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 2003

    Instead, such determinations can be reviewed only by the Board of Veterans Appeals, and from there, by the Court of Veterans Appeals and the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. See Beamon v. … Brown, 125 F.3d 965 , 967 (6th Cir.1997); Larrabee v. Derwinski, 968 F.2d 1497 (2d Cir. 1992) (reviewing history of § 511). 5 . Plaintiff has also filed a Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Zabavsky

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2023

    Hylton-Brown’s system. See Trial Tr. Dec. 1, 2022 a.m. at 54:9-16 (Dr. Tolliver testimony). Il. LEGAL STANDARD Pursuant to Brady v. … Hylton-Brown’s system. Mr.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kim v. United States Department of the Interior

    859 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 7, 2012

    Def.’s Mot., Declaration of Pamela Brown Blackburn (“Brown Blackburn Decl.”) ¶ 4. … Brown Blackburn Decl. ¶ 9.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Costcommand, LLC v. Prs Software Solutions, Inc.

    73 F. Supp. 3d 111 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 2014

    Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002); see also Speelman v. United States, 461 F. Supp. 2d 71, 73 (D.D.C. 2006). … In Hertz Corp. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Barko v. Halliburton Company

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 10, 2014

    & Root Services, Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., KBR Technical Services, Inc., Kellogg Brown & Root Engineering Corporation, Kellogg Brown and Root International, Inc. … Cir. 2014). 5/ Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 403 (1976).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rochon v. Ashcroft

    319 F. Supp. 2d 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 2004

    See also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235 (D.C.Cir.2002); Kowal v. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446 at 452 .

    Reversed on other grounds by Rochon, Donald v. Gonzales, Alberto, 438 F.3d 1211 (2006)Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Bernanke

    538 F. Supp. 2d 53 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 10, 2008

    Dist. v. … Forkkio v. Powell, 306 F.3d 1127, 1131 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999)).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Herbert v. Architect of the Capitol

    766 F. Supp. 2d 59 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 2011

    Co., Ltd. v. … Brown v. Mills, 674 F.Supp.2d 182, 188 (D.D.C.2009).

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Estate of Carolyn Mickens v. Newman

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 18, 2018

    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ESTATE OF CAROLYN MICKENS, et ) al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. … DATE: June 18, 2018 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Columbia Plaza Limited Partnership v. Cowles

    403 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 10, 1975

    See, e. g., Burbank v. … Brown: A Preemption Analysis, 84 Yale L.J. 1164 , 1167-69 (1975), and cases cited therein.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • McCormick v. District of Columbia

    899 F. Supp. 2d 59 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2012

    McCormick says that after Defendant Brown received this transmission, Defendant Patten relayed the allegations of the Tobias incident to Defendant Brown. [Doc. 73 at 31.] … V (emphasis added).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • United States v. Zabavsky

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 25, 2024

    Hylton-Brown obtained the Revel moped “could have affected the judgment of the jury.” United States v. Williams, 233 F.3d 592, 594 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (quoting United States v. … Hylton-Brown’s “dying words,” that testimony is not a sufficient reason for the Court to order a new trial. United States v. Jones, 84 F. Supp. 2d at 126 (citing United States v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lang v. District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2023

    Plaintiff boarded the plane and did not realize until the flight reached London that the rest of the group had missed the flight. Id. ¶¶ 24(g)-(h). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). The court does not assess the truth of what is asserted nor “whether a plaintiff has any evidence to back up what is in the complaint.” Id. (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Powell v. District of Columbia

    645 F. Supp. 66 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 1986

    See Washington, 429 A.2d at 1366 ; Brown v. District of Columbia, 304 A.2d at 293 ; see also Dellums v. … Because of the Brown v. United States opinion, plaintiff’s federal tort claims are preserved from the notice requirements of D.C.Code § 12-309.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Horsey v. United States Department of State

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 28, 2016

    HORSEY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 14-cv-1568 (KBJ) … DATE: October 28, 2016 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Allen v. Beta Construction

    309 F. Supp. 2d 42 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2004

    Totten v. … Pogue v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Dome Patent, L.P. v. Rea

    59 F. Supp. 3d 52 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2014

    Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Philip Morris Inc., 229 F.3d at 1130. … See, e.g., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Philip Morris Inc., 229 F.3d at 1130. Moreover, fact-finders in patent cases are instructed to take an “expansive and flexible approach” when considering obviousness.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • GS New Markets Fund, L.L.C. v. United States Department of the Treasury, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund

    407 F. Supp. 2d 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 16, 2005

    See 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A); see also Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 317-18 , 99 S.Ct. 1705 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979); Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. S.E.C., 873 F.2d 325, 337 (D.C.Cir.1989). … of the entity or any advisory board to the entity; and (c) has been certified as a CDE by the Fund.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Atlantic Coast Airlines Holdings, Inc. v. Mesa Air Group, Inc.

    295 F. Supp. 2d 75 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2003

    See Bertoglio v. … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). The *96 identity of the members of the ACA Board is, therefore, not the issue.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Rodriguez v. United States Department of Defense

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 2017

    RODRIGUEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action … DATE: February 15, 2017 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.