Case law

Kickapoo Tribe of Indians v. Babbitt

827 F. Supp. 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 1993

Kansas v. Finney, 251 Kan. 559 , 836 P.2d 1169 . While that suit was pending, Asst. Secy. Brown returned the Tribal-State compact on February 28, 1992, stating that the compact was in violation of IGRA as to one. point. … Brown, 334 F.Supp. 536 (D.Neb.1971) (validity of retrocession legislation approved in violation of Nebraska constitution a federal question); Omaha Tribe of Nebraska v.

Cauderlier & Associates, Inc. v. Zambrana

527 F. Supp. 2d 142 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 28, 2007

Brown v. … See Brown v. George Washington Univ., 802 A.2d 382, 385 (D.C.2002) (quoting Anderson v.

Seed v. McCarthy

246 F. Supp. 3d 251 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2017

Plaintiff also filed a simultaneous appeal of her perceived constructive demotion and discharge to the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”) on October 12, 2015. (¶¶ 8, 75–76). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Alexander v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

198 F.R.D. 306 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2000

Coastal States Gas Corp. v. … In Upjohn Co. v.

Hornsby v. Watt

217 F. Supp. 3d 58 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 4, 2016

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) ("we accept the plaintiff's factual allegations as true"). … Cir. 2016) (affirming the district court's dismissal of plaintiff's Title VII claims); Brown v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp. Medstar Health, 828 F.

Artis v. Bernanke

161 F. Supp. 3d 97 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2013

Gaither v. District of Columbia, 771 F.Supp.2d 5, 10 (D.D.C.2011) (quoting SEC v. Bilzerian, 729 F.Supp.2d 9, 14 (D.D.C. 2010)). Plaintiffs make several arguments in their motion for reconsideration, all of which fail. … See Artis v.

United States v. Savoy

889 F. Supp. 2d 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 5, 2012

Katz v. … Brown’s Mot. 3 (citing United States v. Feliz, 20 F.Supp.2d 97, 104 (D.Me.1998)); United States v. Weaver, 99 F.3d 1372, 1378 (6th Cir.1996).

United States v. Philip Morris Inc.

212 F.R.D. 418 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 2002

The two Supreme Court cases relied on by Defendant — Perry v. Leeke, 488 U.S. 272 , 109 S.Ct. 594 , 102 L.Ed.2d 624 (1989), and Geders v. … Odone v. Croda Int’l PLC, 170 F.R.D. 66, 68 (D.D.C.1997).

Trout Unlimited v. United States Department of Agriculture

944 F. Supp. 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 23, 1996

Co. v. … Adams v.

McGrath v. Rice

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 2009

Wunder was serious about trying to terminate” him based on his refusal (. . . continued) criticism of an employee constitutes an adverse employment action, Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 458 (D.C. … See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 458 (D.C.

Annette v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 26, 2014

cv-01560-KBJ-DAR Document 19 Filed 08/07/14 Page 2 of 14 Brown, et al. v. … Case 1:13-cv-01560-KBJ-DAR Document 19 Filed 08/07/14 Page 4 of 14 Brown, et al. v.

United States v. Singhal

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 2, 2012

Linde Thomson v. Resolution Trust Corp., 5 F.3d 1508, 1514 (D.C. Cir. 1993). … Quintel Corp., N.V. v. Citibank, N.A., 589 F. Supp. 1235, 1239 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).

Baer v. Montachusett Reg'l Technical Sch. Dist.

380 F. Supp. 3d 143 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 17, 2019

On March 17, 2015, Principal Browne met with Mrs. Baer to discuss a dispute she had with her students regarding the dress code. Principal Browne told Mrs. … Browne and Ms. Crocket to investigate. Id. ¶ 126; see also Garcia v.

Jefferson v. Milvets System Technology, Inc.

986 F. Supp. 6 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 25, 1997

See Waters v. … The 1993-94 version is set forth in the appendix of Brown v.

United States v. Davis

113 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 2000

See United States v. Prailow, 1998 WL 939502 at *1 (D.C.Cir.1998) (unpublished decision); United States v. … United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152 , 102 S.Ct. 1584, 1594-95 , 71 L.Ed.2d 816 (1982).

Chang v. District of Columbia Department of Regulatory & Consumer Affairs

604 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2009

See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). B. … Board of Appeals and Review. D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 12A § 112 (2008). 2 In 3883 Connecticut LLC v. District of Columbia, 336 F.3d at 1073 , the D.C.

McDaniel v. Hidalgo

498 F. Supp. 1194 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 19, 1980

See Nicholson v. Brown, 599 F.2d 639 (5th Cir. 1979); Appelwick v. Hoffman, 540 F.2d 404 (8th Cir. 1976); Roth v. Laird, 446 F.2d 855 (2nd Cir. 1971); Miller v. Claytor, 466 F.Supp. 938 (N.D. Cal.1979); Karlin v. … Nicholson v. Brown, supra at 647.

Wetzel v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs

949 F. Supp. 2d 198 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2013

Compare Brown v. EPA, 384 F. … See Brown, 384 F. Supp. 2d at 276-77.

Cox v. Graphic Communications conference/international Brotherhood of Teamsters

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2009

General Board.” … Brown v. NAS, 844 A.2d 1113, 1117 (D.C. 2004). In this case, Plaintiff discovered Mr.

Weidel v. Ashcroft

234 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 24, 2002

Gant v. Wallingford Board of Education, 195 F.3d 134, 152 (2d Cir.1999). … See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 453 (D.C.Cir.1999)(plaintiff in retaliation action must establish causality).