Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.76s
District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 2021
DAVIS, SR., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. … DATE: June 22, 2021 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States Circuit Judge
Cited 0 timesPublished435 F. Supp. 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 1977
The Government argues that under Brown v. … Brown v. GSA, 96 S.Ct. at 1968 (quoting Preiser v, Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 489-490 , 93 S.Ct. 1827 , 36 L.Ed.2d 439 (1973)).
Cited 9 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 2023
See Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 (1992). A 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss is designed to “test[] the legal sufficiency of a complaint.” Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Rodriguez, 857 F.3d at 906 (“district courts have routinely reviewed those board decisions in the first instance.”); see also, e.g., McKinney v. Wormuth, 5 F.4th 42 (D.C. Cir. 2021); Kidwell v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBrightwell Dispensers Limited v. Dongguan Isce Sanitary Ware Industrial Co. Ltd.
District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 20, 2019
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) BRIGHTWELL DISPENSERS LIMITED, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: December 20, 2019 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Cited 0 timesPublished188 F. Supp. 879 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 1960
The Board of Appeals (hereinafter referred to as the Board) on June 18, 1956, affirmed the examiner’s refusal of claim 34, the single claim before this Court, and which reads as follows: “34. … than copper to the brush track, and brush' track only — that portion of the wire which was bared for contact with the brush — it might be possible to prevent this destructive cycle. ****** “ * * * We had thought that the brown
Cited 2 timesPublishedWinters v. United States Agency for International Development
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2016
ATC Petroleum, 860 F.2d at 1111, quoting Int’l Org. of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Brown, 698 F.2d 536, 551 (D.C. Cir. 1983). … And even a mixed- case appeal to the Board must comply with filing deadlines. See Schlottman v. Solis, 845 F.
Cited 0 timesPublishedFRIENDSHIP EDISON PUBLIC v. Smith Ex Rel. LS
429 F. Supp. 2d 195 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2006
Brown & Associates, PLLC, Carol Elaine Burroughs, Office of the Attorney General, Washington, DC, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION LAMBERTH, District Judge. … Board of Education. The District "has no authority to direct, rescind, overrule, modify, or alter the substantive decision of any hearing officer." Hyde Leadership Pub. Charter Sch. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished676 F. Supp. 324 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 25, 1987
In United States v. … Franks v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedPendergrass v. United States Department of Defense
District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 9, 2020
COLUMBIA ) JAMES ANTHONY PENDERGRASS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: September 9, 2020 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Cited 0 timesPublishedVan Allen v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
925 F. Supp. 2d 119 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 2013
Instead, appellate review of such decisions proceeds from “the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, then to the Court of Appeals for Veterans’ Claims, to the Federal Circuit, and ultimately to the Supreme Court.” Thomas v. … See Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 970 (6th Cir. 1997). Additionally, “[u]nder 5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(1), the APA does not waive sovereign immunity when statutes preclude judicial review,” as § 511 explicitly does. Id.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2021
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) GAIL MARTINS OKORO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: May 5, 2021 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge
Cited 0 timesPublishedSecurities & Exchange Commission v. General Refractories Co.
400 F. Supp. 1248 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 1975
Board Representation 15. From 1965 until April 1971, H. Mayer was represented on the Board of Directors of GRX by Otto Griesser. Subsequently, from April 1971 until April 1975, H. … SEC, 309 F.2d 93 (8th Cir. 1962); SEC v. Atlas Tack Corp., 93 F.Supp. 111, 115 (D.Mass. 1950). 40. The business dealings with H. Mayer, his board representation and his *1258 stockholdings were material facts.
Cited 31 timesPublishedBarnabas v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF UDC
686 F. Supp. 2d 95 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2010
Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … See Reeves v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 2023
Similarly, in Bowen v. … Comm’n v. Brown, 740 F. Supp. 2d 148, 158 (D.D.C. 2010).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNunnally v. District of Columbia
243 F. Supp. 3d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2017
Allen-Brown v. District of Columbia, 174 F. Supp. 3d 463, 481 (D.D.C. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 458-59 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (internal quotation marks omitted), abrogated on other grounds by Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53 (2006).
Cited 13 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 2021
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) RICARDO JOSE CALDERON-LOPEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: May 25, 2021 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge 1 Pursuant
Cited 0 timesPublishedMcCrea v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 14, 2023
Servs. of City of New York, 436 U.S. 658, 690 (1978) (permitting constitutional claims seeking monetary, declaratory, or injunctive relief to be brought against local governments under § 1983); Brown v. … See Saunders v. Nemati, 580 A.2d 660 (1990).
Cited 0 timesPublishedArmstrong v. Department of Commerce
District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2026
BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s suit originated as an appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board to the Federal Circuit but was transferred to this Court. ECF 1; ECF 14. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).
Cited 0 timesPublishedKickapoo Tribe of Indians v. Babbitt
827 F. Supp. 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 1993
Kansas v. Finney, 251 Kan. 559 , 836 P.2d 1169 . While that suit was pending, Asst. Secy. Brown returned the Tribal-State compact on February 28, 1992, stating that the compact was in violation of IGRA as to one. point. … Brown, 334 F.Supp. 536 (D.Neb.1971) (validity of retrocession legislation approved in violation of Nebraska constitution a federal question); Omaha Tribe of Nebraska v.
Reversed on other grounds by Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas v. Bruce Babbitt, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior, 43 F.3d 1491 (1995)Cited 13 timesPublished231 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2002
Although Brown had instructed Ms. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999).
Cited 29 timesPublished
Ask Donna