Case law

Asare v. LM-DC Hotel, LLC

62 F. Supp. 3d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2014

See Minch v. District of Columbia, 952 A.2d 929, 941-42 (D.C. 2008). As a result, this claim fails. The retaliation claim – pressed only by Brown – is similarly infirm for two reasons. … First, Brown has not sufficiently alleged that he engaged in any protected activity, see Lemmons v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp., 431 F.

Black v. District of Columbia

466 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 20, 2006

Plaintiff Jesse Lowe Black filed this action against Howard University police officer James Brown (“defendant Brown”), Howard University as Brown’s employer, and the District of Columbia alleging tortious conduct and constitutional … Homan v. Goyal, 711 A.2d 812, 818 (D.C.Cir.1998) (quoting Drejza v.

Dunn v. Shalala

866 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 1994

Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d at 707 . C. … Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d at 707 .

Cave v. District of Columbia

90 F.2d 383 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 1937

As was said in Tax Board of Commissioners v. … Co. v. Pennsylvania, 134 U. S. 232 [ 10 S.Ct. 533 , 33 L.Ed. 892 ] ; Southwestern Oil Co. v. Texas, 217 U.S. 114 [ 30 S.Ct. 496 , 54 L.Ed. 688 ]; Brown-For-man Co. v.

General Radio Co. v. Watson

188 F. Supp. 879 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 1960

The Board of Appeals (hereinafter referred to as the Board) on June 18, 1956, affirmed the examiner’s refusal of claim 34, the single claim before this Court, and which reads as follows: “34. … than copper to the brush track, and brush' track only — that portion of the wire which was bared for contact with the brush — it might be possible to prevent this destructive cycle. ****** “ * * * We had thought that the brown

Lawrence v. Newsham

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2019

See id.; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1023 (D.C.

Guerrero v. University of District of Columbia

251 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 10, 2003

Loe v. Heckler, 768 F.2d 409, 417 (D.C.Cir.1985) (citing Brown v. General Services Admin., 425 U.S. 820, 825-26 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999).

Chang v. District of Columbia Department of Regulatory & Consumer Affairs

604 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2009

See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). B. … Board of Appeals and Review. D.C. Mun. Regs. tit. 12A § 112 (2008). 2 In 3883 Connecticut LLC v. District of Columbia, 336 F.3d at 1073 , the D.C.

United States v. Jenkins

530 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 1981

In United States v. … In United States v.

Stewart v. Ashcroft

211 F. Supp. 2d 166 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2002

Circuit in Brown v. Brody, another case involving the denial of a lateral transfer, for disparate treatment based on race discrimination. Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 . … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 (emphasis added); see also Freedman v. MCI Telecomm. Corp., 255 F.3d 840, 844 (D.C.Cir.2001).

Gardill v. District of Columbia

930 F. Supp. 2d 35 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 2013

Mot., Ex. 37, Brown Statement ¶¶ 12-13. … The Laffey hourly rate for 2009 to 2010 for attorneys with twenty years of experience and above (Brown) is $465, for attorneys with eight to 2 The matrix derives its names from Laffey v.

Federal Trade Commission v. Staples, Inc.

190 F. Supp. 3d 100 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 2016

F.T.C. v. Staples, Inc., 970 F.Supp. 1066, 1070 (D.D.C.1997) (citing 15 U.S.C. § 53 (b)); see also Brown Shoe v. … F.T.C. v. Arch Coal, Inc., 329 F.Supp.2d at 116 (quoting Brown Shoe at 322 n. 28, 82 S.Ct. 1502 ); see also United States v. General Dynamics, 415 U.S. 486, 498 , 94 S.Ct. 1186 , 39 L.Ed.2d 530 (1974).

Rudometkin v. Wormuth

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 2025

Compl. ¶ 10 (discussing Rudometkin v. United States, No. 20-cv-2687 1 Plaintiff’s claims involve requests from (a) U.S. Army Office of the Judge Advocate General, (b) U.S. Army Review Boards Agency, (c) U.S. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). To survive such a motion, a “complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’”

Barnabas v. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF UDC

686 F. Supp. 2d 95 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2010

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … See Reeves v.

Caldwell v. Kagan

777 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 18, 2011

v. … Judges Ginsburg, Griffith and Brown made up the Court of Appeals panel that affirmed Judge Kennedy’s dismissal. Caldwell v. United States Tax Court, 360 Fed.Appx. 161 (D.C.Cir.2010) (Ginsburg, Brown, Griffith).

Kelley v. District of Columbia

893 F. Supp. 2d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2012

See id.; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). B. … See Brown v. Sim, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 35415 at *11.

Amobi v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections

262 F.R.D. 45 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 8, 2009

to Brown’s personal interests. … V.

Florio v. Gallaudet University

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 2022

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 247 (D.C. Cir. 2002). They have not. … See Browning, 292 F.3d at 247–48.

In Re: Navy Chaplaincy

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 2023

Similarly, in Bowen v. … Comm’n v. Brown, 740 F. Supp. 2d 148, 158 (D.D.C. 2010).

Federal Trade Commission v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 8, 2009

See FTC v. … See FTC v. Whole Foods Market, Inc., 548 F.3d at 1034, 1041 (Brown, J.); id. at 1050 (Tatel, J.).