Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.59s
218 F. Supp. 3d 101 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 2016
See id., Ex. 1 (DC Board of Parole Guideline Prehearing Assessment dated December 6, 2011) at 1. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
Cited 3 timesPublished463 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 29, 2006
Fed’n of Gov’t Employees, AFL-CIO v. Brown, 866 F.Supp. 16, 19 (D.D.C.1994). … Laidlaw, 528 U.S. at 189 , 120 S.Ct. 693 ; Brown, 866 F.Supp. at 19 .
Cited 15 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 2015
Bowden, 106 F.3d at 437 (citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 920, 832-33 (1976)). … Likewise, in Brown v.
Cited 0 timesPublished135 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2001
Board of Educ. of Township High Sch. … Board of County Commissioners, Wabaunsee County, Kansas v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668, 674 , 116 S.Ct. 2342 , 135 L.Ed.2d 843 (1996).
Cited 29 timesPublishedThomas v. National Football League Players Ass'n
941 F. Supp. 156 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 1996
Mitchell v. Baldrige, 759 F.2d 80, 86 (D.C.Cir.1985). … See Maxfield v. Sinclair International, 766 F.2d 788 (3d Cir.1985); Brown v. A.J. Garrard Mfg. Co., 715 F.2d 1549 (11th Cir.1983) (en banc). 2.
Cited 1 timesPublished62 F. Supp. 3d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2014
See Minch v. District of Columbia, 952 A.2d 929, 941-42 (D.C. 2008). As a result, this claim fails. The retaliation claim – pressed only by Brown – is similarly infirm for two reasons. … First, Brown has not sufficiently alleged that he engaged in any protected activity, see Lemmons v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp., 431 F.
Cited 8 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2009
Brown an opportunity to amend her complaint,” and Ms. Brown accepted the offer by filing an amended complaint. See Brown v. United States, 271 F. … Brown v. United States, 389 F.3d at 1297; see also Brown v. United States, 84 Fed. Cl. 400, 403 (Fed.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDoe v. Office of Representative Sheila Jackson Lee
District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 2020
Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1123 (3d Cir. 1982)). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNational Black United Fund, Inc. v. Campbell
494 F. Supp. 748 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 1980
See also Carey v. Brown,__U.S. at___, 100 S.Ct. at 2289. The- regulation must ensure that individuals are not empowered with determining the “worthiness” of a particular cause. Cantwell v. … See Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970); see also Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).
Reversed on other grounds by National Black United Fund, Inc. v. Donald J. Devine, Director, United States Office of Personnel Management, United Way of America, 667 F.2d 173 (1981)Cited 5 timesPublished212 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 11, 2002
That is, the action is not ripe for review until the correction board has rendered its final decision.” Smalls v. United States, 87 F.Supp.2d 1055, 1059 (D.Haw.2000) (citing Dougherty, 784 F.2d at 501 ). … Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 (1953); United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669, 682 , 107 S.Ct. 3054 , 97 L.Ed.2d 550 (1987); Brown v.
Cited 16 timesPublished788 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 1992
The defendant also argues that the government failed to demonstrate that the substance was cocaine base, as defined in United States v. Brown, 859 F.2d 974 (D.C.Cir.1988). … See United States v. Turner, 928 F.2d 956 , 960 n. 1 (10th Cir.1990).
Cited 2 timesPublishedUnited States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.
218 F.R.D. 312 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 12, 2003
Brinton v. … Renegotiation Board v.
Cited 19 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Feb 16, 2010
Defendants Fenty and Brown filed a joint motion to dismiss on September 24, 2009. See generally Fenty & Brown Mot. On September 28, 2009, the court advised the plaintiff, pursuant to Fox v. … Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242.
Cited 0 timesPublished466 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 20, 2006
Plaintiff Jesse Lowe Black filed this action against Howard University police officer James Brown (“defendant Brown”), Howard University as Brown’s employer, and the District of Columbia alleging tortious conduct and constitutional … Homan v. Goyal, 711 A.2d 812, 818 (D.C.Cir.1998) (quoting Drejza v.
Cited 6 timesPublished145 F. Supp. 3d 111 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 18, 2015
Brown, 425 U.S. at 835; see also Howard v. Pritzker, 775 F.3d 430, 432 (D.C. … Brown, 425 U.S. at 833; see also Williams v. Bentsen, No. 93-5192, 1993 WL 469110, at *1 (D.C. Cir.
Cited 0 timesPublished866 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 1994
Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d at 707 . C. … Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d at 707 .
Cited 1 timesPublished188 F. Supp. 879 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 1960
The Board of Appeals (hereinafter referred to as the Board) on June 18, 1956, affirmed the examiner’s refusal of claim 34, the single claim before this Court, and which reads as follows: “34. … than copper to the brush track, and brush' track only — that portion of the wire which was bared for contact with the brush — it might be possible to prevent this destructive cycle. ****** “ * * * We had thought that the brown
Cited 2 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2019
See id.; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1023 (D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublished211 F. Supp. 2d 166 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2002
Circuit in Brown v. Brody, another case involving the denial of a lateral transfer, for disparate treatment based on race discrimination. Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 . … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 (emphasis added); see also Freedman v. MCI Telecomm. Corp., 255 F.3d 840, 844 (D.C.Cir.2001).
Cited 10 timesPublished657 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2009
Jones-Brown. See Cones v. … See Timeliness Opinion at 3 (quoting Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 148 n. 1, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(e)); Powell v.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna