Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

1.59s

  • Void v. Smoot

    218 F. Supp. 3d 101 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 2016

    See id., Ex. 1 (DC Board of Parole Guideline Prehearing Assessment dated December 6, 2011) at 1. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Isenbarger v. Farmer

    463 F. Supp. 2d 13 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 29, 2006

    Fed’n of Gov’t Employees, AFL-CIO v. Brown, 866 F.Supp. 16, 19 (D.D.C.1994). … Laidlaw, 528 U.S. at 189 , 120 S.Ct. 693 ; Brown, 866 F.Supp. at 19 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Hicklin, Jr. v. McDonald

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 2015

    Bowden, 106 F.3d at 437 (citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 920, 832-33 (1976)). … Likewise, in Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Veitch v. Danzig

    135 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2001

    Board of Educ. of Township High Sch. … Board of County Commissioners, Wabaunsee County, Kansas v. Umbehr, 518 U.S. 668, 674 , 116 S.Ct. 2342 , 135 L.Ed.2d 843 (1996).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Thomas v. National Football League Players Ass'n

    941 F. Supp. 156 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 1996

    Mitchell v. Baldrige, 759 F.2d 80, 86 (D.C.Cir.1985). … See Maxfield v. Sinclair International, 766 F.2d 788 (3d Cir.1985); Brown v. A.J. Garrard Mfg. Co., 715 F.2d 1549 (11th Cir.1983) (en banc). 2.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Asare v. LM-DC Hotel, LLC

    62 F. Supp. 3d 30 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 7, 2014

    See Minch v. District of Columbia, 952 A.2d 929, 941-42 (D.C. 2008). As a result, this claim fails. The retaliation claim – pressed only by Brown – is similarly infirm for two reasons. … First, Brown has not sufficiently alleged that he engaged in any protected activity, see Lemmons v. Georgetown Univ. Hosp., 431 F.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • America v. Barreto

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 30, 2009

    Brown an opportunity to amend her complaint,” and Ms. Brown accepted the offer by filing an amended complaint. See Brown v. United States, 271 F. … Brown v. United States, 389 F.3d at 1297; see also Brown v. United States, 84 Fed. Cl. 400, 403 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Doe v. Office of Representative Sheila Jackson Lee

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 2020

    Browning-Ferris Indus., Inc., 691 F.2d 1117, 1123 (3d Cir. 1982)). … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • National Black United Fund, Inc. v. Campbell

    494 F. Supp. 748 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 1980

    See also Carey v. Brown,__U.S. at___, 100 S.Ct. at 2289. The- regulation must ensure that individuals are not empowered with determining the “worthiness” of a particular cause. Cantwell v. … See Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970); see also Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

    Reversed on other grounds by National Black United Fund, Inc. v. Donald J. Devine, Director, United States Office of Personnel Management, United Way of America, 667 F.2d 173 (1981)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lebrun v. England

    212 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 11, 2002

    That is, the action is not ripe for review until the correction board has rendered its final decision.” Smalls v. United States, 87 F.Supp.2d 1055, 1059 (D.Haw.2000) (citing Dougherty, 784 F.2d at 501 ). … Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 93 , 73 S.Ct. 534 , 97 L.Ed. 842 (1953); United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669, 682 , 107 S.Ct. 3054 , 97 L.Ed.2d 550 (1987); Brown v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • United States v. Michael

    788 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 1992

    The defendant also argues that the government failed to demonstrate that the substance was cocaine base, as defined in United States v. Brown, 859 F.2d 974 (D.C.Cir.1988). … See United States v. Turner, 928 F.2d 956 , 960 n. 1 (10th Cir.1990).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

    218 F.R.D. 312 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 12, 2003

    Brinton v. … Renegotiation Board v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Smith v. Fenty

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 16, 2010

    Defendants Fenty and Brown filed a joint motion to dismiss on September 24, 2009. See generally Fenty & Brown Mot. On September 28, 2009, the court advised the plaintiff, pursuant to Fox v. … Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Black v. District of Columbia

    466 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 20, 2006

    Plaintiff Jesse Lowe Black filed this action against Howard University police officer James Brown (“defendant Brown”), Howard University as Brown’s employer, and the District of Columbia alleging tortious conduct and constitutional … Homan v. Goyal, 711 A.2d 812, 818 (D.C.Cir.1998) (quoting Drejza v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Turay v. McHugh

    145 F. Supp. 3d 111 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 18, 2015

    Brown, 425 U.S. at 835; see also Howard v. Pritzker, 775 F.3d 430, 432 (D.C. … Brown, 425 U.S. at 833; see also Williams v. Bentsen, No. 93-5192, 1993 WL 469110, at *1 (D.C. Cir.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dunn v. Shalala

    866 F. Supp. 595 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 9, 1994

    Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d at 707 . C. … Brown v. Bowen, 794 F.2d at 707 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • General Radio Co. v. Watson

    188 F. Supp. 879 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 1960

    The Board of Appeals (hereinafter referred to as the Board) on June 18, 1956, affirmed the examiner’s refusal of claim 34, the single claim before this Court, and which reads as follows: “34. … than copper to the brush track, and brush' track only — that portion of the wire which was bared for contact with the brush — it might be possible to prevent this destructive cycle. ****** “ * * * We had thought that the brown

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lawrence v. Newsham

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 8, 2019

    See id.; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1023 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stewart v. Ashcroft

    211 F. Supp. 2d 166 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2002

    Circuit in Brown v. Brody, another case involving the denial of a lateral transfer, for disparate treatment based on race discrimination. Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 . … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 (emphasis added); see also Freedman v. MCI Telecomm. Corp., 255 F.3d 840, 844 (D.C.Cir.2001).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Nuskey v. Hochberg

    657 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2009

    Jones-Brown. See Cones v. … See Timeliness Opinion at 3 (quoting Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 148 n. 1, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(e)); Powell v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.