Case law

Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans, Association, Inc. v. Eric Shinseki

82 F. Supp. 3d 443 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 11, 2015

Veterans v. U.S. … Zuspann v.

Miles v. University of the District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 2013

Other federal circuits have “applied the standards promulgated by the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”)” to determine whether two or more employers are joint employers for Title VII purposes. See Cardinale v. S. … Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, 919 F. Supp. 2d 105, 115 (D.D.C. 2013) (citing, among others, Mastro v. Potomac Elec. Power Co., 447 F.3d 843, 850 (D.C. Cir. 2006)); see also Hamilton v.

National Fair Housing Alliance, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

208 F. Supp. 2d 46 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2002

See Brown v. Artery Org., Inc., 654 F.Supp. 1106 (D.D.C.1987). … McNeese v. Board of Educ. for Com. Unit. Sch. Dist. 187, 373 U.S. 668, 672 , 83 S.Ct. 1433 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963).

Price v. Unite Here Local 25

883 F. Supp. 2d 146 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2012

Id. at 62; Brown v. Gino Morena Enters., 44 F. Supp. 2d 41, 44 (D.D.C. 1999). A. … Except in limited circumstances, the National Labor Relations Board has exclusive primary jurisdiction over claims involving unfair labor practices. See United Electric, Radio and Mach. Workers of Am. v. Gen.

Miller v. Smith

584 F. Supp. 149 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 1984

Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 829 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1966 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). … Brown v. GSA, supra, 425 U.S. at 833-34 , 96 S.Ct. at 1968-69 ; Hofer v. Campbell, 581 F.2d 975 (D.C.Cir.1978); and Richardson v. Wiley, 569 F.2d 140, 142 (D.C.Cir.1977). 1.

Wilson v. McHugh

842 F. Supp. 2d 310 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 9, 2012

See Bowen v. Massachusetts, 487 U.S. 879, 910 n. 48 (1988); Brown v. … Brady v.

Murphy v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLP

357 F. Supp. 2d 230 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 2004

Board of Partners and Principals (“the Board”) and twenty-one individuals alleged to be members of the Board 3 are also defendants in this case. … Brown v. United States, 271 F.Supp.2d 225, 228 (D.D.C.2003) (citing Gustave-Schmidt v. Chao, 226 F.Supp.2d 191 (D.D.C.2002)).

BMY, a Division of Harsco Corp. v. United States

693 F. Supp. 1232 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 2, 1988

Vietnam Veterans v. Secretary of the *1245 Navy, 843 F.2d 528, 536 (D.C.Cir.1988), see also, e.g., Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 302 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1718 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979) (quoting Morton v. … See Crooker v.

McCrea v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2021

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 244 (D.C.

Broom v. Caldera

129 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 19, 2001

See Ososky v. Wick, 704 F.2d 1264, 1265 (D.C.Cir.1983)(citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.Cir.1985).

United States v. Savoy

883 F. Supp. 2d 101 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2012

Savoy and Brown rely on U.S. Telecom Ass’n v. … Telecom Ass’n v. F.C.C., 227 F.3d 450, 464 (D.C.Cir.2000). Initially, the Court notes that Savoy and Brown’s reliance on U.S. Telecom is misguided. In U.S.

Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal Service

815 F. Supp. 2d 148 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2011

Relying on Brown v. … Brown v. Legal Found. of Wash., 538 U.S. at 235.

Saunders v. Davis

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2016

Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151 (D.C. … See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151 (D.C. Cir. 2015). In Confederate Mem’l Ass’n, the D.C.

Dave v. Lanier

681 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 2010

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

McKinley v. Federal Deposit Insurance

744 F. Supp. 2d 128 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2010

In support of its argument, the Board cites two cases: Quarles v. Dep’t of the Navy, 893 F.2d 390 (D.C.Cir.1990), and Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Train, 491 F.2d 63 (D.C.Cir.1974.) … On January 28, 2010, after initially withholding it, the Board produced Item # 23 (Bates # 0046). (Thro Decl. V 11.) 6 .

Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

672 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 8, 1986

Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 748 F.2d 760, 765-66 (2d Cir.1984); see also Abex Corp. v. Maryland Cas. … Browne (District Manager of IPC in St.

Rodgers v. Perez

139 F. Supp. 3d 67 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2015

or “the Board”). 5 U.S.C. §§ 7512, 7701. … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (internal citations omitted). Further, a plaintiff may be “excused from exhaustion when there are equitable reasons for doing so.” Broom v. Caldera, 129 F.

South Carolina v. United States

585 F. Supp. 418 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 26, 1984

Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 , 64 S.Ct. 757 , 88 L.Ed. 987 (1944); Baskin v. Brown, 174 F.2d 391 (4th Cir.1949); and Rice v. … See also MacGuire v. Amos, 343 F.Supp. 119, 121 (M.D.Ala.1972); Wilson v. North Carolina State Board of Elections, 317 F.Supp. at 1302-03 .

['Battle v. Truland Systems Corporation']

30 F. Supp. 3d 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 19, 2014

Kidane v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 41 F.Supp.2d 12, 17 (D.D.C. 1999); see also Ramey v. … Brown was rehired by Truland.

Aronson v. Dc

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 2013

Jahr v. Dist. of Columbia, No. 2007 CA 2215P, 2009 WL 8153670 (D.C. Super. April 9, 2009) (“Jahr III”). The court concluded, like the ALJ and the OEA board, that Mr. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127, 139 n.10 (1979). Here, the issue of disparate treatment was necessarily decided in Mr. Jahr’s OEA proceeding and subsequent appeals.