Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.10s
District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 6, 2013
\v\\ FILED UNITED sTATEs DISTRICT coURT JUN - 6 2013 FoR THE DISTRICT oF CoLUMBIA cum U_S_ umw & Bankmpwy courts mr me nistricr 01 columbia Margie Brown, ) ) Plaintiff, ) l v. ) Civil Action No. … See GAF Corp. v. United States, 818 F.2d 90l, 917-20 (D.C. Cir. 1987); Jackson v. United Stales, 730 F.2d 808, 809 (D.C. Cir. 1984); Stokes v. U.S. Postal Service, 937 F. Supp. ll, 14 (D.D.C. l996).
Cited 0 timesPublished311 F. Supp. 2d 110 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2004
Green v. … V.
Cited 1 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 2021
Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 249 F. Supp. 3d 439, 442 (D.D.C. 2017) (quoting Maniaci v. Georgetown Univ., 510 F. Supp. 2d 50, 59 (D.D.C. 2007)) (internal quotation marks omitted). 2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 2012
B (Letter to plaintiff from Philip Miller, Paralegal Specialist, Office of the Clerk of the Board, U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board, dated June 30, 2010). … Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 418 (2005).
Cited 0 timesPublished271 F. Supp. 2d 225 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 9, 2003
Gustave-Schmidt v. Chao, 226 F.Supp.2d 191 (D.D.C.2002). See Krooth & Altman v. North Am. Life Assur. … See Davis-Warren Auctioneers, J.V. v.
Cited 14 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2012
Brown, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Heck v. Humphrey, 5 512 U.S. 477,486-87 (1994); see, e.g., Taylor v. US.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 2021
Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 212–13 (2007) (emphasis added); see also Bender v. Williamsport Area Sch. … See, e.g., Johnson v. District of Columbia, 368 F.
Cited 0 timesPublished1 D.C. 85 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1802
Cited 0 timesPublished265 F. 1011 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 3, 1920
The interference originally involved three parties, Brown, Kritz, and McIntosh. Kritz, however, did not appeal from the decision of the Assistant Commissioner. … In the final paragraph of the Assistant Commissioner’s decision, he says: •‘McIntosh was the first to conceive the invention and his application was filed before Brown reduced the invention to practice, either actually or
Cited 0 timesPublished1 D.C. 610 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 1810
Cited 0 timesPublished1 D.C. 79 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 1802
Cited 0 timesPublished1 D.C. 250 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 1805
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2024
Hines v. … See, e.g., Melanie A.S. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Nov 1, 2011
DistrIct & B Courts for the District o;~~~~~ra SHIRON BROWN, Plaintiff, v … See United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974) (acknowledging that the Executive Branch "has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case"); Powell v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 3, 2011
) DEVON BROWN et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) … By Order of January 6, 2011, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, was advised consistent with Fox v. Strickland, 837 F.2d 507 (D.C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2010
Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1285 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (quoting Haynesworth v. Miller, 820 F.2d 1245, 1262 (D.C. Cir. 1987)). … Brown’s Mot. to Dismiss at 7, n.2.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2011
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEMETREOUS BROWN, : : Plaintiff, … v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2010
P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiff, a resident of Ox on Hill, Maryland, sues an individual apparently associated with Target Department Store in District Heights, Maryland.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2023
See Arsanjani v. … Heller v. District of Columbia, 952 F.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna