Case law

District No. 1, Pacific Coast District, Marine Engineers' Beneficial Association, Afl-Cio v. Liberty Maritime Corporation

70 F. Supp. 3d 327 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2014

v. … DATE: September 30, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Gasplus, L.L.C. v. United States Department of Interior

593 F. Supp. 2d 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 6, 2009

Vollmer Co., Inc. v. … Finally, the regulations provide that “[sjubsequent to a decision by the Board, the record filed with the Board and all documents added during the appeal proceeding, including the Board’s decision, shall be forwarded to the

Pasternack v. Huerta

513 F. App'x 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2013

After briefing and oral argument, the court vacated the Board’s decision because it was not supported by substantial evidence. Pasternack v. NTSB, 596 F.3d 836 (D.C.Cir.2010). … . § 46110 (c); Garvey v. NTSB, 190 F.3d 571 , 577 (D.C.Cir.1999). “If there is no substantial evidence to support the Board’s reasoning ... its order must be vacated.” Van Dyke v. NTSB, 286 F.3d 594, 598 (D.C.Cir.2002).

Singh v. George Washington University

383 F. Supp. 2d 99 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 2005

See Brown v. U. of Cincinnati, No. 04-164, 2005 WL 1324885 (S.D. Ohio June 3, 2005). That opinion granted summary judgment to a medical school and against a student with an ADA claim. … With this litigation poised for a relatively short, limited trial, it would not materially advance the termination of the litigation to authorize a piecemeal appeal See Brown v.

Watson v. Dc Water and Sewer Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2018

Following his resignation, Plaintiff complained of his unfair treatment to various DC Water employees and board members and to District of Columbia Councilmembers. … Brown v. Mills, 674 F. Supp. 2d 182, 188 (D.D.C. 2009).

In Re: Navy Chaplaincy

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2013

V. … .”); Brown v. Califano, 627 F.2d 1221, 1234 n.78 (D.C.

Armstrong v. Vance

328 F. Supp. 2d 50 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2004

See Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. … See Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v.

Lattisaw v. District of Columbia

118 F. Supp. 3d 142 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2015

“A Rule 12(b)(6) motion tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint[,]” Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. … See Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1021–22 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (quoting Johnson v. City of Shelby, 135 S.

United States Ex Rel. Shemesh v. CA, Inc.

89 F. Supp. 3d 67 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2015

See Kellogg Brown & Root Servs. … Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 800 F.Supp.2d at 160.

Fredericks v. United States Department of the Interior

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 2, 2021

Plaintiffs appealed this determination to the Board, and in the decision that is the subject of the instant legal action, the Board affirmed on August 4, 2020. See Fredericks v. … DATE: July 1, 2021 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States Circuit Judge

Albritton v. Kantor

944 F. Supp. 966 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 1996

Evans, 431 U.S. 553, 558 , 97 S.Ct. 1885, 1889 , 52 L.Ed.2d 571 (1977); Brown v. GSA 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1967-68 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976). Untimely allegations are time-barred. DuVall v. … Board of Supervisors of LSU, 715 F.2d 971, 981 (5th Cir.1983). See Shepard, 670 F.Supp. at 25 .

Lewis v. District of Columbia

535 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 24, 2008

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . b.

Hargraves v. Capital City Mortgage Corp.

147 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 2, 2001

See Gersman v. … ); United States v.

Naacp v. Naacp Leg. Defense & Educ. Fund

559 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 1983

The resolution did not result from any philosophical divergence but, rather, was adopted primarily as a countermeasure to "massive resistance" to their efforts to enforce compliance with Brown v. … Board of Educ., 611 F.2d 624 , 637 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 447 U.S. 911 , 100 S.Ct. 2999 , 64 L.Ed.2d 862 (1980); NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. v. Campbell, 504 F.Supp. 1365, 1368 (D.D.C.1981).

Black v. District of Columbia

480 F. Supp. 2d 136 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 26, 2007

See, e.g., Panetta v. … Homan v. Goyal, 711 A.2d 812, 818 (D.C.Cir.1998) (quoting Drejza v.

Pacific Shores Subdivision California Water District v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

538 F. Supp. 2d 242 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2008

Cattle Growers’ Ass’n v. U.S. … Babbitt v.

Lucas v. District of Columbia

214 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 5, 2016

Browning v. Clinlon, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (quoting Kowal v. MCI Commc'ns Corp., 16 F.3d 1271, 1276 (D.C. … Taitz v. Obama, 754 F.

N.Y.C. Apparel F.Z.E. v. United States Customs & Border Protection Bureau

563 F. Supp. 2d 217 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2008

Chesapeake Bay Found. v. Dep’t of Agric., 11 F.3d 211, 216 (D.C.Cir.1993). The catalyst theory was explicitly rejected by the Supreme Court in Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. … Thus, even before the Supreme Court clarified in Martin that Landgrafs presumption against retroactive application of a statute could apply to attorney fee statutes, the District of Columbia Circuit held in Brown v.

Leach v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

128 F. Supp. 3d 146 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 3, 2015

Busby v. Capital One, N.A., 772 F. Supp. 2d 268, 284 (D.D.C. 2011) (citation omitted) (quoting Brown v. Argenbright Sec., Inc., 782 A.2d 752, 760 (D.C. 2001)). … Brown v. Children’s Nat’l. Med. Ctr., 773 F. Supp. 2d 125, 138 (D.D.C. 2011); see also Wade v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 01-0334, 2005 WL 1513137, at *6 (D.D.C.

United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

287 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 3, 2003

Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364, 370 , 86 S.Ct. 1531 , 16 L.Ed.2d 622 (1966); see also SEC v. … For example, BATCo has made no formal request to the BATAS Board of Directors to take action on its behalf, or to meet with the BATAS board so that BATCo's directors could personally make the case for BATAS' cooperation.