Case law

Swedish American Hospital v. Leavitt

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 2010

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

United States v. Singhal

842 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 2, 2011

See, e.g., Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 403 , 96 S.Ct. 1569 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976). … See Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v. Wachner, 124 F.Supp.2d 207, 209 (S.D.N.Y.2000).

E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Ladd

224 F. Supp. 149 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 3, 1963

The Patent Office Board of Appeals affirmed that rejection of the claims, and the sole issue before this Court is whether the conclusion reached by the Board of Appeals was clearly erroneous. … Signal Manufacturing Co. v. General Electric Co., D.C., 217 F.Supp. 734 .

United States v. Recognition Equipment Inc.

725 F. Supp. 587 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 1989

United States v. Treadwell, 760 F.2d 327 (D.C.Cir.1985), cer t. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986); United States v. Puerto, 730 F.2d 627 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. … [Tr. 4160] V.

Hovsepyan v. Blaya

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2011

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 459 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (quoting Branson v. Price River Coal Co., 853 F.2d 768, 772 (10th Cir. 1988)) (brackets in original) (language altered); see Slovinec v. American University, 520 F. … Mogenhan v. Napolitano, 613 F.3d 1162, 1166 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (quoting Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53, 68 (2006)). The Board acknowledges that Mr.

Smith v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 2020

Bynum v. District of Columbia, 257 F. Supp. 2d 1, 1 (D.D.C. 2002); Barnes v. District of Columbia, 924 F. Supp. 2d 74, 77 (D.D.C. 2013). 100. … Smith v. D.C., 306 F. Supp. 3d 223, 233-40 (D.D.C. 2018) (citing to Barnes v. District of Columbia, 793 F.

Singletary v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 2011

Commissioners of Bryan Co. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 (1997). … None of the other cases cited by the District involve municipal “actors” similar to the Parole Board either. See, e.g., Bolton v.

Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. Cafesjian

597 F. Supp. 2d 128 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2009

AGM & M is governed by a Board of Trustees who serve as the Board of Directors of AGM & M. Id. ¶ 12. Defendant Waters, Jr. is CFF’s representative member on AGM & M’s Board of Trustees. Id. ¶¶ 16,17,19. … Brown v. Collins, 402 F.2d 209 , 212 & n. 4 (D.C.Cir.1968). 6 . In their Reply, Plaintiffs emphasize that this and several other statements could be considered non-defamatory opinion that is not ordinarily actionable.

Gasplus, L.L.C. v. United States Department of Interior

593 F. Supp. 2d 80 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 6, 2009

Vollmer Co., Inc. v. … Finally, the regulations provide that “[sjubsequent to a decision by the Board, the record filed with the Board and all documents added during the appeal proceeding, including the Board’s decision, shall be forwarded to the

United States v. Smith

160 F. Supp. 256 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 21, 1958

The following authorities are to the same effect : United States v. Spadafora, 7 Cir., 200 F.2d 140, 142 ; United States v. Brown, 7 Cir., 207 F.2d 310, 311 . … Diggs v. Welch, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 5 , 148 F.2d 667 ; United States v. Wight, 2 Cir., 176 F.2d 376 ; Pelley v. United States, 7 Cir., 214 F.2d 597 ; United States v. Edwards, D.C., 152 F.Supp. 179 , 185 et seq. . Bailey v.

Jones v. Johnston

368 F. Supp. 571 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 9, 1974

Shelton v. United States Board of Parole, supra. … See Sutherland v. D. C. Board of Parole, supra, Marchand v. Director, U. S. Probation Office, 421 F. 2d 331 , 335 n. 5 (1st Cir. 1970).

Goodman v. Perpetual Building Association

320 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 1970

See also, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Brown, 260 F.Supp. 323 (Pa.1966), where the Court stated that provisos “ * * * are qualifiers, not nullifies”. … Rosenblum v. Judson Eng’r Corp., 99 N.H. 267 , 109 A.2d 558 (1954).

United States v. Taylor

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2023

United States v. … Gov’t Brown Opp. at 6–7 (quoting and discussing Dean v. United States, 556 U.S. 568, 570–76 (2009)).

Burford v. Yellen

246 F. Supp. 3d 161 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2017

Marcus v. Geithner, 813 F. Supp. 2d 11, 17 (D.D.C. 2011). This Court agrees. Accordingly, the Board, which is a federal entity, has moved to dismiss Ms. … V. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, the Board’s Motion to Dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Steadman

798 F. Supp. 733 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 1, 1991

’ counsel that the Funds would liquidate (i.e. return all available cash to the Funds’ shareholders for their shares of the Funds)_” Affidavit of Ellyn Brown (August 3, 1989) (“Brown Aff.”) at ¶¶ 3-4. … V.

Foggy Bottom Ass'n v. District of Columbia Office of Planning

441 F. Supp. 2d 84 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2006

Compl. ¶ 40; see George Washington TJniv. v. District of *87 Columbia, 318 F.3d 203 (D.C.Cir.2003); George Washington Univ. v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 831 A.2d 921 (D.C.2003). … Summit Health, Ltd. v. Pinhas, 500 U.S. 322, 325 , 111 S.Ct. 1842 , 114 L.Ed.2d 366 (1991); Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); Browning v.

Gary v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

886 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 1995

Charles Brown. Mr. Edward Long was Mr. Brown’s supervisor and Plaintiffs second-level supervisor. … Supervisor Brown told her that he had heard about the sexual harassment charges and that he did not want her working at Southeast.

Taylor Wine Co., Inc. v. Department of Treasury

509 F. Supp. 792 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 1981

See also Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748 , 96 5. Ct. 1817, 48 L.Ed.2d 346 (1976). … See NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 290-292 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 987-988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). Defendants’ reliance on 27 C.F.R. § 4.38 is also in error.

Flannery v. District of Columbia Department of Health

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2023

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (Rule 12(b)(6) case); Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Vilsack , 808 F.3d 905, 913 (D.C. … [of The Big Board’s license] itself is ultra vires, null and void.”

Singh v. George Washington University

383 F. Supp. 2d 99 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 23, 2005

See Brown v. U. of Cincinnati, No. 04-164, 2005 WL 1324885 (S.D. Ohio June 3, 2005). That opinion granted summary judgment to a medical school and against a student with an ADA claim. … With this litigation poised for a relatively short, limited trial, it would not materially advance the termination of the litigation to authorize a piecemeal appeal See Brown v.