Case law

Middle Atlantic Conference v. United States

353 F. Supp. 1109 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 21, 1972

See also Brown Transport Corp. v. … See, e. g., New York Board of Trade & Transportation v.

Lance v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

244 F. Supp. 3d 147 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2017

A Rule 12(b)(6) motion tests the legal sufficiency of a complaint, Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002), and “not whether the plaintiff will prevail on the merits,” Woodruff v. … Welcome Ctr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 148 n.1 (1984) (per curiam); Jideani v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth., 979 F. Supp. 2d 77, 84 (D.D.C. 2013).

Alston v. Town of Brookline

308 F. Supp. 3d 509 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2018

Comm'rs of Bryan Cty., Okl. v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 404, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (emphasis in original) (internal citation omitted); Burrell v. … Board of County Com'rs of Bryan County, Okl. v. Brown , 520 U.S. 397 , 406, 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997).

Jahr v. District of Columbia

968 F. Supp. 2d 186 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 2013

In reviewing this determination, the Board noted that Mr. … Brown v. Felsen, 442 U.S. 127 , 139 n. 10, 99 S.Ct. 2205 , 60 L.Ed.2d 767 (1979). Here, the issue of disparate treatment was necessarily decided in Mr. Jahr’s OEA proceeding and subsequent appeals.

Loucka v. Lincoln National Life Insurance Company

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 8, 2018

The court in Brown v. Fed. Express Corp. also took judicial notice of the CDC’s webpages about Lyme-testing. 62 F. Supp. 3d 681, 687 (W.D. Tenn. 2014). So too here. 2 Mr. Loucka’s arguments to strike Mr. … Brown v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 12 F. Supp. 3d 88, 98 (D.D.C. 2014). Certainly, Mr.

National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. Britton

187 F. Supp. 359 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 1960

Nevertheless, Brown failed to depart from the premises, but lingered in the store for no apparent reason. The deceased asked Brown to leave but the latter declined to do so. … Of-field v. Davis, 100 Va. 250, 263 , 40 S.E. 910 .

Eley v. Stadium Group, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2015

June 1, 2012) (same); Brown v. Money Tree Mortg., Inc., 222 F.R.D. 676, 681 (D. Kan. 2004) (two affidavits). Thus, this Court will conditionally certify the proposed class. II. … DATE: September 22, 2015 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Ransom v. Dorko

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2025

The Board’s initial decision became final on September 3, 2020, and Plaintiff was notified of her options for appeal, which included filing a petition for MSPB Board review, a petition with the U.S. … Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 835 (1976). By the same token, the Supreme Court recognizes the CSRA as a “comprehensive system for reviewing personnel action taken against federal employees.” United States v.

National Federation of Federal Employees v. United States

695 F. Supp. 1196 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 1988

Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 569 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1735 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). … (quoting Brown v. Glines, 444 U.S. 348, 354 , 100 S.Ct. 594, 599 , 62 L.Ed.2d 540 (1980) and citing Snepp, 444 U.S. at 509 n. 3, 100 S.Ct. at 765 n. 3).

Hornsby v. Thompson

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 2023

As support, Plaintiff might have cited Trammel v. Brown, No. 94-cv-149, 1995 WL 708666 (N.D. Ill. … of Rudder v. Vilsack, 10 F. Supp. 3d 190, 196 (D.D.C. 2014) (citations omitted); see also Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 15 (D.C.

Powell v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

238 F. Supp. 2d 160 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 9, 2002

See Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. … Also relying on Brown v. Brody, the D.C.

United States v. Jones

84 F. Supp. 2d 124 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 1999

United States v. Lafayette, 983 F.2d 1102, 1105 (D.C.Cir.1993), citing Thompson v. United States, 188 F.2d 652, 653 (D.C.Cir.1951). … United States v. Mangieri, 694 F.2d 1270, 1286 (D.C.Cir.1982), citing Larrison v. United States, 24 F.2d 82 (7th Cir.1928) (the “Larrison standard”).

Southern Education Foundation v. United States Department of Education

District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 2025

For over 150 years, SEF “has advanced equitable education policies across the Southern United States, including supporting Thurgood Marshall’s legal team in Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).” Pl. … In Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), the Supreme Court declared racial segregation in public education unconstitutional, and mandated its elimination “with all deliberate speed.” Brown v.

Spencer v. District of Columbia

168 F. Supp. 3d 114 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 4, 2016

Confronted with similar facts, the court in Brown v. City of New York, No. 11 Civ. 1068, 2013 WL 491926 (S.D.N.Y. … The officers in Brown also had not “articulated why [their] safety, or any other valid law enforcement objective, required such prolonged forced nakedness.” Id.; see also Thornton v. Fray, 429 Fed.

['U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. E-SMART TECHNOLOGIES, INC.']

31 F. Supp. 3d 69 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 12, 2014

SEC v. Brown, 878 F. Supp. 2d 109, 116 (D.D.C. 2012). The SEC claims that Grace and Saito, company officers responsible for authorizing and ratifying the company’s filings, signed 10-KSBs containing false statements. … See Brown, 740 F. Supp. 2d at 155.

Cox v. GRAPHIC COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE

603 F. Supp. 2d 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2009

Brown v. NAS, 844 A.2d 1113, 1117 (D.C.2004). In this case, Plaintiff discovered Mr. … General Board.”

Torres v. Harker

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 5, 2022

Ass’n v. State Farm, 463 U.S. 29, 43 (1983); Jackson v. Mabus, 808 F.3d 933, 936 (D.C. Cir. 2015); Stewart v. Spencer, 344 F. … The separation between the “Medical Evaluation Board Phase” and the “Physical Evaluation Board Phase” is starkly presented in beige and brown.

McManus v. Williams

519 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 2007

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 455 (D.C.Cir.1999). … Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 765 , 118 S.Ct. 2257 , 141 L.Ed.2d 633 (1998). A plaintiff must also demonstrate that she has suffered an objectively tangible harm. Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 .

Koretoff v. Schaefer

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2009

The almond marketing order, 7 C.F.R. § 981.1 et seq., regulates the handling of almonds grown in California and is administered locally by the Almond Board of California (the “Board”), a ten-member board composed of growers … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 453 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (citation omitted). Likewise, plaintiffs’ reliance on Arbaugh v.

Foster v. Gonzales

516 F. Supp. 2d 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 2007

Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 13 (D.C.Cir.1985); see also Jarmon v. Powell, 208 F.Supp.2d 21, 23 (D.D.C.2002). The 45-day deadline for initiating EEO counseling is, however, subject to equitable tolling. … Workers v.