Case law

Anderson v. USAir, Inc.

619 F. Supp. 1191 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 1985

Anderson a boarding pass. Mr. Anderson and the group with him attempted thereafter to board the plane without a boarding pass. When a USAir employee offered to get him a pass, Mr. … See Brown v. District of Columbia Transit System, Inc., 523 F.2d 725, 727 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 862 , 96 S.Ct. 121 , 46 L.Ed.2d 91 (1975).

Lewis v. Bayh

577 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 9, 2008

Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C.1998) (citing Kuwait Airways Corp. v. Am. Sec. Bank, N.A., 890 F.2d 456 , 463 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1989)). 2. … Brown v. Dist. Unemployment Comp. Bd., 411 F.Supp. 1001, 1001-02 (D.D.C.1975) (citing 1 Fed. Prac. 2d § 0.60[6]). 2.

Georgia v. Ashcroft

195 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 2002

See Bush v. … Wright v.

Ozark Mountain Regional Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Department of Health & Human Services, Provider Reimbursement Review Board

798 F. Supp. 16 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 16, 1992

Joseph’s Hospital of Kansas City v. Heckler, 786 F.2d 848 (8th Cir.1986); Alacare Home Health Servs. Inc. v. Sullivan, 891 F.2d 850 (11th Cir.1990). … See, e.g., Tucson Medical Ctr. v. Heckler, 611 F.Supp. 823 (D.D.C.1985), aff'd sub nom. Washington Hosp. Ctr. v. Bowen, 795 F.2d 139 (D.C.Cir.1986).

Miller v. Hersman

759 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 4, 2010

Plaintiff Richard Miller, a former employee of the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB” or “the Board”), brings suit against Defendant Deborah A.P. Hersman, Chairman of the NTSB. … Dist. v.

Ellis v. Chappell

230 F. Supp. 164 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 1964

Johnson v. Wilkinson, 279 F.2d 683 (5th Cir. 1960); Teague v. Looney, 268 F.2d 506 (10th Cir. 1959); Groce v. Hudspeth, 121 F.2d 800 (10th Cir. 1941). And see Zerbst v. … See Stack v. Boyle, 342 U.S. 1 , 72 S.Ct. 1 , 96 L.Ed. 3 (1951); United States v. Foster, 278 F.2d 567 (2d Cir. 1960).

United States v. United States Gypsum Company

404 F. Supp. 619 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 10, 1975

; and (b) fix, maintain and stabilize the terms and conditions of sale thereof; and (c) adopt and maintain uniform methods of packaging, handling and delivery of gypsum board.” … United States Gypsum Company, National Gypsum Company, Georgia-Pacific Corporation, The Celotex Corporation, Colon Brown and Andrew J. Watt. 5 .

Trifax Corp. v. District of Columbia

53 F. Supp. 2d 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 14, 1999

Harlow v. … Perkins v. Lukens Steel Co., 310 U.S. 113, 127 , 60 S.Ct. 869 , 84 L.Ed. 1108 (1940). Plaintiff cites to Board of Regents v.

Yazzie v. National Organization for Women

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2021

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Ayissi-Etoh v. Fannie Mae, 712 F.3d 572, 576 (D.C. Cir. 2013). Indeed, the tests for evaluating all three types of claims under § 1981 are the same as under Title VII. See id. at 576–78; Brown v.

Dantzler v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

810 F. Supp. 2d 312 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 2011

Additionally, the plaintiff brings suit against the HPD and the Hammond Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board (“Civil Service Board”), seeking that the court order these defendants to schedule a date for a civil service … Brown, 1989 WL 45103, at *1 (D.C.Cir.1989).

Wilson v. Smoot

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2019

See Kowal, 16 F.3d at 1276; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. 5 Cir. 2002). … Board of Parole, pursuant to the regulations of the D.C. Board of Parole, to determine the prisoner’s suitability for release on parole.”).

Arnold v. Secretary of the Navy

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2020

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See, e.g., Kaempfer v. Brown, 684 F. Supp. 319, 325–36 (D.D.C. 1988) (imposing pre-filing injunction on counseled parties where they had harassed a bank attempting to develop property), aff’d 872 F.2d 496 (D.C.

Hovsepyan v. Blaya

770 F. Supp. 2d 259 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2011

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 459 (D.C.Cir.1999) (quoting Branson v. Price River Coal Co., 853 F.2d 768, 772 (10th Cir.1988)) (brackets in original) (language altered); see Slovinec v. … Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53, 68 , 126 S.Ct. 2405 , 165 L.Ed.2d 345 (2006)). The Board acknowledges that Mr.

Johnson v. District of Columbia

67 F. Supp. 3d 157 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 10, 2014

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39–40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. B.

Brooks v. Grundmann

851 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2012

Barbour v. Browner, 181 F.3d 1342, 1348 (D.C. Cir. 1999); cf. Tomka v. … (quoting Alfano v. Costello, 294 F.3d 365, 377 (2d Cir. 2002)); Ware v. Billington, 344 F.

Gaston County v. United States

288 F. Supp. 678 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 16, 1968

v. … See the dissenting opinion of Judge Brown, generally approved by the Supreme Court, in United States v.

United States v. Philip Morris Inc.

116 F. Supp. 2d 131 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2000

Defendants also established a Scientific Advisory Board ("SAB”), which they claimed was an independent research arm of the CTR. Compl. at ¶ 61. … Brown & Williamson was certainly not the first occasion in which the Supreme Court expressed such a view. In FTC v.

Semon v. Ledecky

326 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 2004

USOP’s Board of Directors (“the Board”), however, decided at a October 1, 1997 meeting not to pursue the CD & R proposal. Id. … Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Development v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .

Holdcraft v. Town of Brookfield

365 F. Supp. 3d 190 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 2019

Bingham v. City Council of Fitchburg , 52 Mass.App.Ct., 566 , 754 N.E.2d 1078 , 1080 (Mass. App. Ct. 2001) ( citing Costello v. Board of Appeals of Lexington , 3 Mass.App.Ct. 441 , 333 N.E.2d 210 (Mass. App. … See, e.g., Garfield v. Board of Appeals of Rockport , 356 Mass. 37 , 39, 247 N.E.2d 720 , 722 (1969) ; Bingham , 52 Mass.App.Ct. at 570 -71 , 754 N.E.2d at 1081-82 ; Konover Mgmt. Corp. v.

Eagle Healthcare, Inc. v. Sebelius

969 F. Supp. 2d 38 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 10, 2013

In deciding a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1), a court must “accept as true all of the factual allegations contained in the complaint” and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the plaintiff, Brown v. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002).