Case law

Wadelton v. Department of State

208 F. Supp. 3d 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 22, 2016

Wadelton v. Department of State, 106 F. … and describing the procedures to be followed by the Wadelton reconstituted boards.

Doe v. Lieberman

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2021

Brown v. Colvin, 219 F. Supp. 3d 121, 125 (D.D.C. 2016) (quoting Broyles v. Astrue, 910 F. Supp. 2d 55, 60 (D.D.C. 2012)). … Supp. 2d at 1026 (citing Brown v. Dep’t of Navy, 229 F.3d 1356, 1358–59 (Fed Cir. 2000)).

Hunter v. Rubio

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 23, 2026

At this stage in the proceedings, and because Hunter proceeds pro se, the Court considers the factual allegations from all his filings, not just his opera- tive complaint. 1 Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. … Wiley v. Glassman, 511 F.3d 151, 155 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).

THALASINOS v. Harvey

479 F. Supp. 2d 45 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2007

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). Dismissal is not appropriate unless the “plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Conley v. … Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 176 (D.C.Cir.1997). The final decisions of military correction boards are viewed under “an unusually deferential application of the ‘arbitrary and capricious’ *50 standard.” Kreis v.

Plummer v. Gallaudet University

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 13, 2026

Ho v. Garland, 106 F.4th 47, 50 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt Grp., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015)). … Brown, 789 F.3d at 152 (quoting Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). And here, 21 Ms.

Theus v. Internal Revenue Service

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 30, 2015

Defendants. ) ____________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Kimely Lachell Theus, a resident of New York, filed a pro se complaint against The Board … Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972); Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. Cir. 2008), plaintiff’s allegations in this case neither present a “federal question suitable for decision,” Best v.

Vogel v. Tenneco Oil Company

276 F. Supp. 1008 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 1967

Tennessee Valley *1011 Authority, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 124, 125 , 155 F.2d 864, 865 (1946); King v. Wall & Beaver St. Corp., 79 U.S.App.D.C. 234, 237 , 145 F.2d 377, 380 (1944) ; Board-man v. … Boston Medical Supply Co. v. Brown & Connolly, Inc., 98 F.Supp. 13 (D.Mass.1951), aff’d sub nom., Boston Medical Supply Co. v. Lea & Febiger, 195 F.2d 853 (1st Cir. 1952); see Kelberine v.

Waters v. Armenian Genocide Museum & Memorial, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2010

See Clancy v. … See MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., 549 U.S. 118, 136 (2007) (quoting Wilton v.

Debose v. Greenberg Traurig, LLP

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 30, 2024

Defendant USF Board of Trustees joined these motions. ECF No. 18. Ms. … Webb v. U.S. Veterans Initiative, 993 F.3d 970, 972-73 (D.C. Cir. 2021) (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015)). III.

Miller v. Rosenker

578 F. Supp. 2d 107 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2008

Rosenker in his official capacity as Chairman of the National Transportation Safety Board (“NTSB”) pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and the Age Discrimination in Employment … See Meijer v.

Ames v. Napolitano

121 F. Supp. 3d 126 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2015

Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2014). … Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff’s constitutional claim under Brown v.

Francis v. Acting Director, D.C. Office of Zoning

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2023

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Adm’r of Massachusetts v.

Stainback v. Mabus

671 F. Supp. 2d 126 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 2, 2009

Fayson v. … Brown, 449 F.2d 654, 655-56 (9th Cir.1971) (affirming the district court’s voiding of a discharge decision until the denial of “a fair and impartial hearing” by the military review board was cured).

Beberman v. Blinken

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 2024

Brown, No. 90-cv-2677 (RCL), 1991 WL 257973, at *1 (D.D.C. … Supp. 3d at 108 (reviewing final Grievance Board decision); Citizens Ass’n of Georgetown, Inc. v. Zoning Commission of D.C., 477 F.2d 402 (D.C.

MacKtal v. Garde

111 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 2000

Additionally, in Asuncion v. … Plaintiff urges the Court to follow the holding in Swann v.

Griscom Russell Co. v. Coe

50 F. Supp. 333 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 7, 1943

Such was the view taken *334 by the Board of Appeals. … See, in this connection, the Supreme Court decision of Hailes v. Van Wormer, 20 Wall. 353 [ 22 L.Ed. 241 ]; [James Spear] Stove Co. v.

Anderson v. USAir, Inc.

619 F. Supp. 1191 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 1985

Anderson a boarding pass. Mr. Anderson and the group with him attempted thereafter to board the plane without a boarding pass. When a USAir employee offered to get him a pass, Mr. … See Brown v. District of Columbia Transit System, Inc., 523 F.2d 725, 727 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 862 , 96 S.Ct. 121 , 46 L.Ed.2d 91 (1975).

LaGON v. Barry

658 F. Supp. 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 1987

In Board of Regents v. … The Tenth Circuit reached the same conclusion in Brown v. Bigger, 622 F.2d 1025 (10th Cir.1980); 8 see also, Covington v.

Powell v. Castaneda

390 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2005

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 455 (D.C.Cir.1999) (holding that an adverse employment action is a prerequisite to bringing a Title VII claim).

Hanson v. OFFICE OF SENATOR MARK DAYTON

535 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 2008

Indeed, Judge Brown, in her concurring opinion in Fields v. … Judges Sentelle and Griffith joined Judge Brown’s concurring opinion.