Case law

Worth v. Jackson

377 F. Supp. 2d 177 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2005

Russell v. Principi, 257 F.3d 815, 818 (D.C.Cir.2001) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … Affairs v. Burdine, 450 U.S. 248, 253 , 101 *184 S.Ct. 1089, 67 L.Ed.2d 207 (1981), the Court’s inquiry ends and the plaintiffs claim must be dismissed, see Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999); Lutes v.

Everett v. USAir Group, Inc.

927 F. Supp. 478 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 1996

v. … Any participant of the plan may submit to the Retirement Board any dispute concerning his or her participation in or benefits under the plan. 5 . See also Sisco v.

Hammond v. D.C. Record Center

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 2009

Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. B. … Brown v. Smith, 828 F.2d 1493, 1494-95 (10th Cir. 1987); see Inmates of Occoquan v. Barry, 850 F.2d 796, 796 (D.C.

Kalorama Citizens Association v. Suntrust Bank Company

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2020

Looking to Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 717 A.2d 2 Crestar is not a party to this litigation. … Further, the Superior Court, in issuing that ruling, noted that Brown v.

Vince v. Mabus

956 F. Supp. 2d 83 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 24, 2013

When Vince received the Board’s adverse decision, he petitioned the Board for reconsideration. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Morgan v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 2016

Board of Parole’s 1987 regulations. (Compl. at 3.) … Date: April 4, 2016 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

French v. Devine

547 F. Supp. 443 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 7, 1982

Kurtz, 600 F.2d 984, 989 (D.C.Cir.1979), French’s citation in his brief of Jordan v. Merit Systems Protection Board, C.A. No. 80-0465 (D.D.C. … See Doe v. Martin, 404 F.Supp. 753, 763 (D.D.C.1975) (three judge court) (D. C. Board of Elections has power to issue declarations of D. C.

Gill v. United States Department of Justice

875 F.3d 677 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 14, 2017

There, the Court considered whether the1 Merit Systems Protection Board could review the Navy’s denial of a security clearance. 484 U.S. at 520 , 108 S.Ct. 818 . … The government next argues that, even if courts may review some security clearance—related equal protection claims, Gill’s are precluded by Title VII because he alleges discrimination in employment and under Brown v.

Jones v. McKenzie

628 F. Supp. 1500 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 1986

James Brown (May 24, 1984). On June 12, 1984, the Superintendent issued Directive 205.1. … See Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985); Johnson v. United States, 628 F.2d 187, 194 (D.C.Cir.1980).

Martin v. Donley

886 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2012

. ¶ 5; Def.’s Mem. at 12-13; Pl.’s Opp’n at 15-17. 9 brought within the terms of some other jurisdictional grant,” Brown v. … In fact, the Court finds that the Board for Correction’s decision is supported by substantial evidence. See Knight v.

Dillon v. United States

357 F. Supp. 3d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 2019

Brown v. Parker Drilling Offshore Corp. , 410 F.3d 166 , 171 (5th Cir. 2005) ; see also *61 West v. Midland Enters., Inc. , 227 F.3d 613 , 617 (6th Cir. 2000) ; Wactor v. Spartan Transp. … Brown v. Parker Drilling Offshore Corp. , 410 F.3d 166 , 178 (5th Cir. 2005). Dillon's separate Jones Act lawsuit, which was also assigned to my docket, has been settled by the parties. See Dillon v.

Gross v. Winter

692 F. Supp. 1420 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 1, 1988

Defendant neglects to mention that the court in Browning interpreted Speech and Debate Clause immunity and no other kind. As Judge Posner stated in Forrester v. … Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, 569 , 88 S.Ct. 1731, 1735 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). Thus, defendant's categorical contention is incorrect. Similarly, defendant’s broad contention that under Hall v.

Kretchmar v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 27, 2014

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … In Brandon, an inmate brought suit alleging that he had a protected libert y interest in having the Parole Board adhere to its own procedures, and that the Board deprived him of due process when it delayed his reparole

Gold Anti-Trust Action Committee, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 2011

Dep’t of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass’n, 532 U.S. 1, 8 (2001); see NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132, 148 (1975); EPA v. Mink, 410 U.S. 73 (1973). … Therefore, the Board has properly withheld portions of Documents 7, 8, and 11 under Exemption 4. V.

Sky Angel U.S., LLC v. National Cable Satellite Corporation

947 F. Supp. 2d 88 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 3, 2013

But merely pleading that multiple entities hold positions on a board of directors does not establish a horizontal agreement for purposes of Section 1. See Nat’l ATM Council, Inc. v. … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 (1962).

Beverly Enterprises v. Califano

446 F. Supp. 599 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 17, 1978

See Brown v. Richardson, 395 F.Supp. 185, 191 (W.D.Pa. 1975). The Court finds substantial evidence that plaintiff’s reliance on the letter was not reasonable. … As the Supreme Court pointed out in Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v.

Blohm v. Tobriner

234 F. Supp. 941 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 1964

The matter came before the court on the record before the Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board and other exhibits, one of which was the action of the Board of Commissioners on appeal. … Even if this matter had not been before the Board of Police and Fire Surgeons, the Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, and the Board of Commissioners on appeal, its absence, the court concludes, would not have

Hobson Ex Rel. Hobson v. Hansen

327 F. Supp. 844 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 1971

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954); Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 , 91 S.Ct. 1267 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (April 20, 1971). … Plaquemines Parish School Board, E.D.La., 291 F.Supp. 841, 846 (1967), affirmed as modified, 5 Cir., 415 F.2d 817 (1969); Hill v. LaFourche Parish School Board, E.D.La., 291 F.Supp. 819, 822-823 (1967); Lee v.

Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAIL. TRAIN.

262 F. Supp. 177 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 16, 1967

In National Labor Relations Board v. … In a later decision, National Labor Relations Board v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278 , 85 S.Ct. 980 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 , the Supreme Court went even further.

In Re US Office Products Securities Litigation

326 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 2004

USOP's Board of Directors ("the Board"), however, decided at a October 1, 1997 meeting not to pursue the CD & R proposal. Id. … Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Development v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .