Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdcd

10,000+ results

0.95s

  • Neely v. Blumenthal

    458 F. Supp. 945 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 6, 1978

    Brown v. General Services Administration, 507 F.2d 1300, 1307 (2d Cir. 1974). … Brown, supra, 507 F.2d at 1303. 13 . See also United States v.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Cleveland County Ass'n for Government by the People v. Cleveland County Board of Commissioners

    965 F. Supp. 72 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 1997

    Board of Commissioners v. … As Moore v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

    District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 18, 2025

    Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 326 (1962); see also Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Tech. … FTC v. H.J. Heinz Co., 246 F.3d 708, 718 (D.C. Cir. 2001) (quotation marks omitted); see also FTC v. Whole Foods Mkt., Inc., 548 F.3d 1028, 1039 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (opinion of Brown, J.)

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cardinale v. Mathews

    399 F. Supp. 1163 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 26, 1975

    See Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin, 417 U.S. 156 , 177 n. 14, 94 S.Ct. 2140 , 40 L.Ed.2d 732 (1974); Childs v. United States Board of Parole, 511 F.2d 1270, 1276 (D.C. Cir. 1974); Woodward v. … Both Brown and Brower held that Goldberg v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America v. National Labor Relations Board

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 27, 2012

    . §§ 151-57; New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 130 S. Ct. 2635, 2638 (2010). Except in limited circumstances not present here, the Board must have a quorum of three members in order to act. … Piper v. DOJ, 312 F. Supp. 2d 17, 21 (D.D.C. 2004) (quoting Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. County of Oneida, 214 F.R.D. 83, 98 (N.D.N.Y. 2003).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Scahill v. District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 2017

    Brown, 19 A.3d at 357. … See Brown, 19 A.3d at 356–57 (collecting cases); Gallotham, Inc. v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 820 A.2d 530, 535 (D.C. 2003) (274-day delay non-prejudicial).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • American Bankers Insurance Group, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

    3 F. Supp. 2d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 1998

    Ford v. … V.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • McGary v. Ravindra

    District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 2020

    James v. United States, 48 F. Supp. 3d 58, 63 (D.D.C. 2014). The Court considers Plaintiff’s pro se complaint in light of all filings in the record. Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. … Williams v. Bank of New York Mellon, 169 F. Supp. 3d 119, 125 (D.D.C. 2016); see also Brown v. Koenick, No. 96-5296, 1997 WL 150101, at *1 (D.C. Cir.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Frick v. Coe

    27 F. Supp. 913 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 15, 1939

    .” *914 The claims were rejected by the Primary Examiner and his rejection was affirmed by the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office on the ground that the claims were unpatentable over the prior art. … In discussing the Brown and Cheetham patents, Mr. Harold C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Abramoff

    55 F. Supp. 3d 84 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2014

    See Brown v. D.C. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 486 A.2d 37, 43 (D.C.1984) (en banc). D.C. Rule of Professional Conduct 1.11(a) governs “revolving door” conflicts of interest. … See Brown, 486 A.2d at 49-50 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hickey v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals

    457 F. Supp. 584 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 21, 1978

    State Board of Bar Examiners for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 429 F.Supp. 16 (E.D.Pa.1977). Plaintiff’s reliance to the contrary on Berger v. Board of Psychological Examiners, 172 U.S. … Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 (1943). In Bates v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Cobell v. Norton

    231 F. Supp. 2d 295 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 12, 2002

    Covington v. District of Columbia, 57 F.3d 1101, 1107 (D.C.Cir.1995); see also Save Our Cumberland Mountains, Inc. v. … Statement, Brown Aff., Ex. 3. Defendants claim that Brown has failed to demonstrate that he qualifies for the rate indicated by the Laffey matrix, citing Griffin v.

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Continental Resources, Inc. v. Jewell

    134 F. Supp. 3d 231 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2015

    In *235 Adams Fruit Co., Inc. v. … (citing Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 151 , 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984). Given the Court’s analysis above, the Court does not agree that equitable tolling is appropriate in this case.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Matthews v. District of Columbia

    924 F. Supp. 2d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2013

    See Bell v. … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 408 (1997), such as an officer’s negligence or even willingness to flout the rules in pursuit of evidence.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Waters v. Armenian Genocide Museum & Memorial, Inc.

    692 F. Supp. 2d 57 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 9, 2010

    Laningham v. U.S. … See Clancy v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Amato v. Chafee

    337 F. Supp. 1214 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 1972

    McCurdy v. Zuckert, 359 F.2d 491 (5th Cir., 1966) cert. denied, McCurdy v. Brown, 385 U.S. 903 , 87 S.Ct. 212 , 17 L.Ed.2d 133 ; Reed v. Franke, supra. … In Orlando v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bennett v. Pettiford - U.S.P.C.

    District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 2014

    Maddox v. Elzie, 238 F.3d 437, 445 (D.C. Cir. 2001); see Hardy v. … Ketanji Brown Jackson Ketanji Brown Jackson United States District Judge DATE: May 12, 2014

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McCrea v. District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2021

    See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Oryszak v. Sullivan

    565 F. Supp. 2d 14 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2008

    Oryszak appealed that Notice of Review to the Security Appeals Board (“Board”), id. ¶ 31 , and the decision was upheld again on May 3, 2007, id. ¶ 32 . … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Nyambal v. Allied Barton Security Services, LLC

    153 F. Supp. 3d 309 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 26, 2016

    Browning, 292 F.3d at 242; Bennett Enters., Inc. v. Domino's Pizza, Inc., 45 F.3d 493, 499 (D.C. Cir. 1995). Mr. … Command Consulting Group LLC, v. Neuraliq, Inc., 623 F. Supp. 2d 49, 52 (D.D.C. 2009) (citing Browning, 292 F.3d at 242).

    Cited 10 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.