Case law

In Re Uchendu

812 A.2d 933 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2002

Similarly, the jurat of Agnes Straughn’s Certificate of Completion stated “I, Agnes V. … Pointing to the scienter requirements for criminal forgery, see United States v. Gilbert, 140 U.S.App.

In Re Daniel

11 A.3d 291 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2011

See Disciplinary Counsel v. Wise, 108 Ohio St.3d 381 , 843 N.E.2d 1198, 1200 (2006). … The Board failed to note, however, that in all three of the cited cases, In re Powell, 898 A.2d 365 (D.C.2006), In re Wright, 885 A.2d 315 (D.C.2005), and In re Brown, 851 A.2d 1278 (D.C.2004), the Board not- only imposed

Moore v. Moore

135 A.2d 643 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1957

A husband sued for divorce on the ground of “voluntary separation from bed and board for five consecutive years without cohabitation”. Code 1951, § 16-403. … Brown v. Walter, 2 Cir., 62 F.2d 798, 800 (quoted in Knapp v. Kinsey, 6 Cir., 232 F.2d 458, 467 , certiorari denied 352 U.S. 892 , 77 S.Ct. 131 , 1 L.Ed.2d 86 ).

Harman v. United States

718 A.2d 114 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 3, 1998

Budoo v. United States, 677 A.2d 51, 54 (D.C.1996). We turn first to the procedural claims raised by the government and Harman. Citing Brown v. … As we said in DeVeau v.

Symes v. United States

633 A.2d 51 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1993

They then poked a hole in one of the green bags and saw a greenish-brown substance inside. Appellant was placed under arrest. … See Lawrence v. United States, 566 A.2d 57, 60 (D.C.1989). “Essentially, our role is to ensure that the trial court had a substantial basis for concluding that no [Fourth Amendment] violation occurred.” Brown v.

District of Columbia v. Green

687 A.2d 220 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1997

District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Dep’t v. … In part quoting from Brown v.

Fleming v. District of Columbia

633 A.2d 846 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 29, 1993

The appeals board’s decision can then be appealed to Superior Court within 30 days. D.C.Code §§ 40-631-645 (1981 ed.). … Co. v. Brown, 593 A.2d 184 (D.C.1991), [i]t is a longstanding and basic principle that a motion under Rule 60(b) may not be utilized as a substitute for an appeal....

Butler v. Metropolitan Police Department

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 2020

See generally, e.g., Brown v. … .”); Murphy v.

In Re Howes

39 A.3d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2012

Maryland, and Giglio v. … Brown, 726 P.2d 638, 640-41 (Colo. 1986) (prosecutor disbarred for convictions involving dishonesty and abuse of public office).

Bathroom Design Institute v. Parker

317 A.2d 526 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 1974

The contract was void and unenforceable, Miller v. Peoples Contractors, Ltd., D.C.App., 257 A.2d 476, 478 (1969), Brown v. … See Gardner and North Roofing and Siding Corp. v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, 150 U.S.App.D.C. 329, 332 , 464 F.2d 838, 841 (1972); see also Tcherepnin v.

Chapple v. Chapple

204 A.2d 815 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1964

In Brown v. … Ill 1964) provides: “(a) * * * A legal separation from bed and board may also be granted for cruelty; * * 2 . The parties lived in a house owned by appellant. 3 .

Taylor v. Frenkel ex rel. Frenkel

499 A.2d 1212 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 1985

See Gabrielian v. Gabrielian, 473 A.2d 847, 850 (D.C. *1215 1984); Brown v. Brown, 343 A.2d 59, 61 (D.C.1975). … Capital Development Board, 717 F.2d 385, 390 (7th Cir.1983), such an award is specifically allowed in the District of Columbia by D.C.Code § 15-111 (1981).

Graves v. United States

490 A.2d 1086 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1984

The first two of these claims we have rejected previously in the appeal *1106 of Larry Brown, originally appellant’s code-fendant, who was tried separately, and so may be disposed of summarily. Brown v. … Brown, supra, 464 A.2d at 125 (quoting McUin v. United States, 17 App.D.C. 323 , 332 (1900)).

In re S.H.

570 A.2d 814 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 1990

Estelle v. … A key government witness was nineteen-year-old Michael Cox, who knew both appellant and Brown. 12 He testified that appellant, not Brown, fired the shot.

Greenwood's Transfer & Storage Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

553 A.2d 1246 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1989

Notice of a civil or administrative action by a board or commission given to the counsel of a party is considered notice to the party. See St. Louis v. Alverno College, 744 F.2d 1314 , 1316 n. 4 (7th Cir.1984); Bell v. … Brown, 181 U.S.App.D.C. 226 , 233 & n. 60, 557 F.2d 849 , 856 & n. 60 (1977); Aberson v. Glassman, 70 F.R.D. 683 , 684 & n. 3 (S.D.N.Y.1976); Moore v.

West End Citizen Association v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment Foggy Bottom Grocery, LLC

112 A.3d 900 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 2015

.”); Saah v. … Ass’n v.

Taylor v. Montgomery

413 A.2d 923 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 14, 1980

Brown, 536 F.2d 117, 121 (6th Cir. 1976); American Pharmaceutical Association v. Weinberger, 377 F.Supp. 824 (D.D.C.1974), aff’d, 174 U.S.App.D.C. 202 , 530 F.2d 1054 (1976). In Richards v. … District of Columbia Hacker’s License Appeal Board, D.C.App., 384 A.2d 421 (1978), and Bradford v. Hacker’s License Appeal Board, D.C.App., 396 A.2d 988 (1979).

Goozh v. Capitol Souvenir Co., Inc.

462 A.2d 1140 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 14, 1983

Brown v. Brown, 343 A.2d 59, 61 (D.C.1975) (per curiam). Indeed, “[t]he law favors the settlement of controversies, and a valid and binding agreement of compromise and settlement will be enforced as any other contract.” … State Highway Board, 130 Vt. 317 , 292 A.2d 814 (1972) (damages in condemnation proceedings to be determined as of a time other than the customary date of taking); Hayes v.

District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board v. Fraternal Order of Police/Metropolitan Police Department Labor Committee

987 A.2d 1205 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 28, 2010

Just as “Congress [has] declared a national policy favoring arbitration,” District of Columbia v. Greene, 806 A.2d 216, 221 (D.C.2002) (quoting Southland Corp. v. … (citations omitted); see also Cheek v.

Dillard v. Yeldell

334 A.2d 578 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 1975

Bollotin v. Workmen Service Co., 128 Cal.App.2d 339 , 275 P.2d 599 (1954); Bragassa v. Bragassa, supra note 5 ; Board of Educ. v. Fowler, supra note 5; Linden v. … Whorton v. Gaspard, supra note 6 ; State v. Groff, supra note 10 ; Keigley v. Bench, supra note 10 . 28 . Board of Pub. Util. Comm’rs v.