Case law

M.M. & G., Inc. v. Jackson

612 A.2d 186 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 2, 1992

See Bennerson v. … Co. v.

In re Wagner

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 2025

See, e.g., Comford v. … See, e.g., Brown v. United States, 675 A.2d 953, 955 (D.C. 1996) (declining to consider arguments appellant did not present in brief on appeal but instead only purported to incorporate).

Burgess v. Pelkey

738 A.2d 783 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1999

Etheredge v. … Worthinglen Condominium Unit Owners’ Ass’n v. Brown, 57 Ohio App.3d 73 , 566 N.E.2d 1275, 1277 (1989) (quoting Hidden Harbour Estates, Inc. v. Norman, 309 So.2d 180, 181-82 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1975)); see also Johnson v.

Nelson-White v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 2024

See Rogers v. … (quoting Board of Zoning Authority, Decision and Order at 8 (Oct. 30, 2018))); Washington Metro. Area Transit Auth. v. 6,627 Square Feet of Land, No. CV 21- 1753, 2022 WL 2438549, at *2 (D.D.C.

Sheppard v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

993 A.2d 525 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 2010

Relying in large part on this court’s decision in Nixon v. … See also Mayo v.

In Re Antioch University

418 A.2d 105 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 9, 1980

Mangum, D.C.App., 368 A.2d 548, 553 (1977); District Unemployment Compensation Board v. Security Storage of Washington, supra; Wieck v. Sterenbuch, D.C.App., 350 A.2d 384 (1976). … See generally Brown v. National Loan & Investment Co., 139 S.W.2d 364 (Tex.Civ.App.1940).

Finkelstein v. Hemispherx Biopharma, Inc.

774 A.2d 332 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 14, 2001

Houston, 356 A.2d 646, 647 (D.C.1976) (per curiam) (citing § 586 of the 1938 version of the Restatement of Torts); Brown v. Collins, 131 U.S.App. … Brown , 131 U.S.App.

Grumbine v. Mayor of Washington

9 D.C. 578 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1876

Hessey v. Burden

615 A.2d 562 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1992

Cramer v. Brown, 7 Ohio St.3d 5, 6 , 454 N.E.2d 1321, 1322 (1983) (citations omitted); see also Diaz v. Board of County Commissioners, 502 F.Supp. 190, 193-194 (S.D.Fla.1980); State ex rel. Williams v. … Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U.S. 563, 573 , 30 S.Ct. 578, 579 , 54 L.Ed. 883 (1910); accord, e.g., Nordlinger v. Hahn, — U.S. -, -, 112 S.Ct. 2326, 2332 , 120 L.Ed.2d 1 (1992). Mr.

Mount Jezreel Christians Without a Home v. Board of Trustees of Mount Jezreel Baptist Church

582 A.2d 237 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1990

Williams, et al. v. Board of Trustees of Mount Jezreel Baptist Church, Civil Action No. 12510-82. … Mount Jezreel Baptist Church Board of Trustees v. Thompson, No. 86-846, decided May 17, 1988 (unpublished).

Baldwin v. DC Office of Employee Appeals & DC Dept. of Youth Services

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 2020

Understandably in light of this court’s prior case law, 6 the OEA Board treated that limit as jurisdictional. If the Board’s ruling was correct in that regard, we could uphold it on that basis alone. See Hamer v. … See SEC v. Jerry T.

District of Columbia Fire & Emergency Medical Services Department v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board

105 A.3d 992 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 11, 2014

Police Dep’t v. District of Columbia Pub. Emp. … Minis v. United States, 40 U.S. 423, 445 , 15 Pet. 423 , 10 L.Ed. 791 (1841); see also United States v.

In re Szymkowicz

124 A.3d 1078 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2015

Similarly, the Board must defer to the factual findings of the Hearing Committee if those findings are supported by substantial evidence. See, e.g., In re Brown, 112 A.3d 913, 917 (D.C.2015) (per curiam). … Cf., e.g., Dayton Bar Ass’n v.

In re Howes

52 A.3d 1 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2012

Maryland, and Giglio v. … Brown, 726 P.2d 638, 640-41 (Colo.1986) (prosecutor disbarred for convictions involving dishonesty and abuse of public office).

Nixon v. Quick

781 A.2d 754 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 27, 2001

Stevens v. Quick, 678 A.2d 28, 31 (D.C.1996) (quoting Bennett v. Ridley, 633 A.2d 824, 826 (D.C.1993)). … Brown-Bey v. Hyman, 649 A.2d 8, 9 (D.C.1994).

GEORGE WALKER, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY OFFICER

127 A.3d 524 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 25, 2015

District of Columbia v. Brown, 739 A.2d 832, 835 (D.C. 1999); see also 5 U.S.C. § 5596 (b)(1)(A)(i) (2012). … In fact, in Andress v. United States Postal Service, 56 MSPR 501 (1993), the Merit Systems Protection Board traced the FBPA’s mitigation requirement back to even before the FBPA itself.

In Re McConnell

667 A.2d 94 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 1995

Bar Counsel supports the Board’s recommendation. 1 Substantially for the reasons stated by the Board, 2 Gregory R. McConnell is hereby reinstated to the Bar of this court, subject to the following conditions: 1. … The issue that concerns the Board, not for the first time, is that of imposing conditions for reinstatement. As we noted in In re James Brown, Docket No. 223-93 (B.P.R.

St. James Mutual Homes v. Andrade

951 A.2d 766 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 2008

Brown-Lee, the president of the Board of Directors, informing her that he would be moving out of his dwelling unit on August 31. He said the same thing in another letter, also dated July 22, 1997, to Mr. … Brown-Lee, the former president of the Board, or Mr. Lytle, the former property manager. Therefore, the trial court must determine whether either of these individuals had the authority, actual or apparent, to accept Mr.

Hill v. Dist. of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment

150 A.3d 1282 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 25, 2016

In Re Uchendu

812 A.2d 933 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2002

Similarly, the jurat of Agnes Straughn’s Certificate of Completion stated “I, Agnes V. … Pointing to the scienter requirements for criminal forgery, see United States v. Gilbert, 140 U.S.App.