Case law

In Re Myrick

624 A.2d 1222 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 20, 1993

See Greenberg v. … v.

Matter of Colson

412 A.2d 1160 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 1979

See Laughlin v. … Laughlin v.

Embassy of the People's Republic of Benin v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

534 A.2d 310 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 30, 1987

See Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 381 A.2d 1372, 1384 (D.C.1977). 9 . … Board of Zoning Appeals, 126 Conn. 648, 650-54 , 13 A.2d 675, 676-77 (1940); Scott v. Minnix, 95 Ga.App. 589, 590 , 98 S.E.2d 196, 197 (1957); Balsam v. Jagger, 231 N.Y.S.2d 450 , 452 (Sup.Ct.1962); Scott v.

Neighbors United for a Safer Community v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

647 A.2d 793 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1994

Davidson v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 617 A.2d 977, 981 (D.C.1992). … In Kopff v.

In re Joseph

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 2023

See, e.g., Joseph v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., No. B288641, 2019 WL 2498400, at *2 (Cal. Ct. App. June 17, 2019) (declining to review the trial court’s “declar[ation that] Joseph was a vexatious litigant”); Joseph v. … In re Brown, 617 A.2d 194, 197 n.11 (D.C. 1992) (quoting In re Barton, 432 A.2d 1335, 1336 (Md. 1981)). Mr.

Adams v. District of Columbia

122 A.2d 765 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 18, 1956

Regent Restaurant, 175 Misc. 526 , 25 N.Y.S.2d 181 ; Scates v. Board of Com’rs of Union City, 196 Tenn. 274 , 265 S.W.2d 563 ; and Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 29 App.D.C. 273 , 25 L.R.A.,N.S., 98. 8 . Harris v. District of Columbia, 256 U.S. 650 , 41 S.Ct. 610 , 65 L.Ed. 1146 ; District of Columbia v.

Vaughn v. United States

598 A.2d 425 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 29, 1991

REPORT OF THE COUNCIL OF THE DistRict of Columbia, Committee on the Judiciary, On Bill 6-47, “The Youth Rehabilitation Act of 1985,” (Report) at 2 (June 19, 1985); see also Brown v. … See Rhema Christian Center v. Board of Zoning Adjustment, 515 A.2d 189, 192-93 (D.C.1986) (giving preclusive effect to a finding by the Board of Zoning Adjustment); Foster v.

Citizens for Responsible Options v. DC Board of Zoining Adjustment and DC Department of General Services

211 A.3d 169 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 2019

Brown v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 486 A.2d 37, 52 (D.C. 1984) (en banc) (internal quotation marks omitted). … See Gilmartin v.

In re Rodriguez-Quesada

122 A.3d 913 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 2015

Similarly, the Board must defer to the factual findings of the Hearing Committee if those findings are supported by substantial evidence. See, e.g., In re Brown, 112 A.3d 913, 917 (D.C.2015) (per curiam). … In re Kline, 11 A.3d 261, 265 (D.C.2011) (court in disciplinary proceeding did not consider argument that was not briefed and was only raised during oral argument); Bardoff v.

In Re Lewis

88 A.2d 582 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 21, 1952

In Beausoliel v. … In Brown v. United States, 80 U.S.App.

Allen v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

538 A.2d 752 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 9, 1988

Brown v. … E.g., Simmons v. Police & Firefighters’ Retirement & Relief Board, 478 A.2d 1093, 1095 (D.C. 1984); Jadallah v.

Bledsoe v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

544 A.2d 723 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 25, 1988

See Gaskins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 315 A.2d 567, 568 (D.C.1974). The agency claims that Ms. … Arthur v. District of Columbia Nurses’ Examining Board, 459 A.2d 141, 146 (D.C.1983).

R. & G. Orthopedic Appliances & Prosthetics, Inc. v. Curtin

596 A.2d 530 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1991

Brown as part of her own case. Ms. Brown relies on Morgan v. Commercial Union Assurance Co., 606 F.2d 554 (5th Cir.1979) and Grant v. Brandt, 796 F.2d 351 (10th Cir.1986), but neither case is in point. … As in Niles , the Board of Education sought indemnity from the physician.

Belcon Inc. v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority

826 A.2d 380 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2003

Ross v. Fierro, 659 A.2d 234 , 239 n. 5 (D.C.1995) (quoting Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008 , 1021 n. 19 (D.C.1991)). … Co. v.

In re Turner

915 A.2d 351 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2006

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD ON PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY This matter comes before the Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”) on a petition for reinstatement filed pursuant to Board Rule 9.1 and D.C … See In re Brown, 617 A.2d 194, 199 (D.C.1992) (citing In re Barton, 291 Md. 61 , 432 A.2d 1335, 1336 (1981)).

Greene v. Real Estate Commission

263 A.2d 634 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1970

Brown v. Winston, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 58 , 197 F.2d 601 (1952). . … NLRB v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 380 U.S. 438, 444 , 85 S.Ct. 1081, 1064 , 13 L.Ed.2d 951 (1965); accord, NLRB v.

Burwell v. United States

901 A.2d 763 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 2006

See Brown v. United States, 546 A.2d 390, 397-98 (D.C.1988). 783 A.2d at 129 . … Counsel was appointed for Brown, and Brown invoked his privilege against self-incrimination. The prosecutor then “debriefed” Brown in conformity with Carter v.

Chatterjee v. Mid Atlantic Regional Council of Carpenters

946 A.2d 352 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 18, 2008

We normally rely upon a certificate of service to establish the date and fact of mailing, see, e.g., District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board v. … Brown, 740 A.2d 551, 553 (D.C.1999) (“Notwithstanding the certificate of mailing ..., it appears that copies of the document may not have been mailed at all....”); District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board, 593

Meshel v. Ohev Sholom Talmud Torah

869 A.2d 343 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 2005

Brown, Inc. v. … J.M., 854 P.2d 1346, 1350 (Colo.Ct.App.1992); Brown v. Rock, 184 Ga.App. 699 , 362 S.E.2d 480, 481 (1987); Duffy v.

Harrington v. Moss

407 A.2d 658 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 17, 1979

O’Rourke v. … O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 507 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951). “Nor is it necessary that the employee be engaged at the time of the injury in activity of benefit to this employer.”