Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdc

7,092 results

2.91s

  • George Washington University Medical Center v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    1987 D.C. 8 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1987

    See District of Columbia Hospital Association v. Barry, 498 A.2d 216, 217 (D.C. 1985). … Siler v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, 525 A.2d 620, 622 (D.C.1987). Thus, in our view, this court lacks jurisdiction over the GW appeal at this time.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Schecter v. Merchants Home Delivery, Inc.

    892 A.2d 415 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 2006

    The drivers were directed to call in every half-hour and report their location to MHD. 8 The progress of the drivers was monitored on tracking boards in the MHD office. … More recently, in Brown v.

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • Yeager v. District of Columbia

    33 A.2d 629 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1943

    Minnesota v. Hitchcock, 185 U.S. 373 , 22 S.Ct. 650 , 46 L.Ed. 954 ; Trans-Atlantic Trust Co. v. Pagenstecher, 53 App.D.C. 42 , 287 P. 1019 ; Ray v. … Brown v. Randle & Garvin, Inc., D.C. Mun.App., 32 A.2d 104 . Bowles v. District of Columbia, 22 App.D.C. 321 . Stebbins’ Estate v. Helvering, 74 App.D.C. 21 , 121 F.2d 892 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Sandoval v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    93 A.3d 678 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 2014

    Hosp. v. … District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 960 A.2d 603 , 606 (D.C.2008) (“we acknowledge [DOES’s] expertise and ... responsibility for administering the Workers’ Compensation Act”); see generally, e.g., Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • ACOTT VENTURES, LLC T/A SHADOW ROOM v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD

    135 A.3d 80 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 17, 2016

    Dyas v. … See Bardoff v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Ramos v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

    601 A.2d 1069 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 9, 1992

    For example, in Brown v. … The Brown case has a rather tortuous subsequent history, none of which relates directly to the principle for which we cite it here. See Brown v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • BDO USA, LLP v. Jia-Sobota & A2Z Assoc., Inc. D/B/A Everglade Consulting

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 6, 2022

    Cross & Brown Co. v. Nelson, 167 N.Y.S.2d 573, 575 (N.Y. App. … And Miller involved three board members as arbitrators and two partners outside of the board. 949 S.W.2d at 861.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Vk v. Child and Family Services Agency

    14 A.3d 628 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 2011

    Moderwell & Co. v. … .”); State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia v. Basiliko

    44 A.2d 407 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1945

    United States v. Sloat, D.C.N.J., 56 F.2d 434 ; United States v. Brown, D. C., 5 F.Supp. 81 , affirmed 2 Cir., 79 F.2d 321 , certiorari denied McCarthy v. United States, 296 U.S. 650 , 56 S.Ct. 309 , 80 L.Ed. 462 . … United States v. Grunberg, C.C.Mass., 131 F. 137 . United States v. Frankfeld, D.C., 38 F.Supp. 1018, 1019 ; see also United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Herndon

    596 A.2d 592 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1991

    Board Rule 3.1. … See Brown v. United States, 567 A.2d 426, 427 (D.C.1989) (rule 17(c) not intended to provide additional means of discovery), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 110 S.Ct. 1497 , 108 L.Ed.2d 632 (1990); see also United States v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Jadallah v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    476 A.2d 671 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 8, 1984

    Hawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 381 A.2d 619, 622 (D.C.1977) (per curiam). … Kopff v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, 381 A.2d 1372, 1385-86 (D.C.1977); General Railway Signal Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 354 A.2d 529, 531 (D.C.1976); Wallace v.

    Cited 50 timesPublished
  • Muhammad v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    34 A.3d 488 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 2012

    Board’s mental-mental rule announced in Ramey v. … McCamey, 947 A.2d at 1198 , 1209 (citing Brown v. Dep’t of Employment Servs., 700 A.2d 787, 791-92 (D.C.1997) (other citation omitted)). In Mr.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. District of Columbia Employee Appeals and James O'Boyle

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 22, 2014

    Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Corr., 993 A.2d 529, 532 (D.C. 2010). “When reviewing an [] OEA decision, we . . . … Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. District of Columbia Employee Appeals and James O'Boyle

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 2014

    Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Corr., 993 A.2d 529, 532 (D.C. 2010). “When reviewing an [] OEA decision, we . . . … Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Harkness v. District of Columbia

    8 D.C. 121 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 15, 1873

    aforesaid; that plaintiffs have not paid said assessment, and that certificates of indebtedness have been prepared by the board and will be issued, and that it is the design of said board to negotiate the same and collect … But an assessment made by a board or body having no power to make it is a nullity and no lien upon property.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia Public Schools v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services and Gloria Mitchell

    123 A.3d 947 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2015

    Shaw, 478 U.S. 310 (1986), and District of Columbia v. Brown, 739 A.2d 832 (D.C. 1999). … .”); Nolen v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Hayes

    271 A.2d 701 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 16, 1970

    The officers followed the men into the boarded-up building and saw appellee with money in his hand and his companion, one Dade, throw something under a pool table. … Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 261 A.2d 834 (1970).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Washington Hospital Center v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    983 A.2d 961 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2009

    Middledorf v. Wash. Hosp. Ctr. (Middledorf IV), No. 06-20, slip. op. at 6 (Compensation Review Board March 23, 2007), available at 2007 WL 1227538 , 2007 D.C. Wrk. Comp. Lexis 157. II. … Cooper Brown who held two pre-hearing conferences on November 15 and December 20, 2004. Judge Brown was then elevated to the CRB and the case was assigned to ALJ Russell. 3 . Dr.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • AHMED AIT-GHEZALA v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT, and SB-URBAN, LLC, Intervenor.

    148 A.3d 1211 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 2016

    Homes, Inc. v. District of Columbia Zoning Comm’n, 975 A.2d 186, 190 (D.C. 2009) (quoting 1330 Connecticut Ave., Inc. v. … The Board may . . . conduct further hearings or . . . even reach a different result.” Washington Ethical Soc’y v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 421 A.2d 14, 19 (D.C. 1980) (quoting Salsbery v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • In Re Steele

    630 A.2d 196 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 1993

    Counsel for the Board assured the court at oral argument that all members of the Board were aware of the contents of Steele’s letter at the time the motion was denied. … See also Rule XI, §§ 16(d)(1)-(d)(2); In re Brown, 617 A.2d 194, 196 (D.C.1992); In re Stanton, 589 A.2d 425, 426 (D.C.1991) (per curiam) (Stanton IV), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 1178 , 117 L.Ed.2d 422 (1992).

    Cited 51 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.