Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersdc

7,092 results

1.01s

  • Cunningham v. District of Columbia

    584 A.2d 573 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 1990

    See Allen v. District of Columbia, 533 A.2d 1259, 1261-1263 (D.C.1987); Jenkins v. District of Columbia, 379 A.2d 1177 (D.C.1977); Miller v. Spencer, 330 A.2d 250, 251-252 (D.C.1974); Brown v. … Balazic, 802 F.2d 1077, 1078 (8th Cir.1986); Walker v. Prisoner Review Board, 769 F.2d 396, 398 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1065 , 106 S.Ct. 817 , 88 L.Ed.2d 791 (1986); Pope v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia v. American Federation of Government Employees

    619 A.2d 77 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1993

    Quoting Brown v. … Brown , however, did not deal with the Contract Clause. The trial judge also failed to observe that Brown , as a 1984 decision, is not binding on this court. See M.A.P. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    279 A.2d 514 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 1971

    Compare Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. … Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce Comm’n, 219 U.S. 498 , 31 S.Ct. 279 , 55 L.Ed. 310 (1911) ; United States v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • DC METRO. POLICE DEPT. v. Broadus

    560 A.2d 501 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 9, 1989

    Jones v. Police and Firemen's Retirement and Relief Board, 375 A.2d 1, 5 (D.C.1977). … Saah v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 433 A.2d 1114, 1116 (D.C.1981). We examine the record accordingly. III.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • North Cleveland Park Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    541 A.2d 912 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 25, 1988

    See Jackson v. District of Columbia Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board, 537 A.2d 576 (D.C.1988). … Compare Nelson v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Bell v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections

    403 A.2d 330 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 1979

    Davis v. Attorney General, supra, and Brown v. … Brown v. United States, supra, relied upon the authority of Davis v. Attorney General, supra. 4 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • The Kamit Institute for Magnificent Achievers v. District of Columbia Public Charter School Board

    81 A.3d 1282 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 2013

    .”); Mallof v. D.C. … Comford v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rose Lees Hardy Home & School Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    343 A.2d 564 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 26, 1975

    See Udall v. Tallman, 380 U.S. 1, 16-17 , 85 S.Ct. 792 , 13 L.Ed.2d 616 (1965); Daniel v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 329 A.2d 773, 775 (1974); Dietrich v. … District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 320 A.2d 282, 286 (1974); Taylor v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App.,' 308 A.2d 230, 232 (1973).

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Ballard v. District of Columbia

    10 D.C. 49 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1881

    The thirty-seventh section of the act organizing a government for the District of Columbia requires that all contracts made by the Board of Public Works shall be in writing and signed by the parties making the same, and a … The act contemplated a written instrument filed away in the archives of the board and authenticated by their signatures. There is no such officer provided for as an assistant secretary.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kat, LLC T/A Cloud Lounge & Sports Bar v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2024

    Levelle, Inc. v. D.C. Alcoholic Beverage Control Bd., 924 A.2d 1030, 1035 (D.C. 2007). … “Prior Adjudication” is defined as “[v]iolations that have been adjudicated and can therefore be counted for purposes of computing violation history.” 23 D.C.M.R. § 199.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board v. District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department

    593 A.2d 641 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 25, 1991

    See Woodley Park Community Association v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment, 490 A.2d 628, 635 (D.C.1985); Thomas v. … District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, 490 A.2d 1162, 1164 (D.C.1985); Gosch v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, 484 A.2d 956, 958 (D.C.1984); Goto v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Washington Gas Light Co. v. Lansden

    9 App. D.C. 508 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 9, 1896

    Cheese v. … Co. v. Quigley, 21 How. 202 ; Fogg v. Boston & Lowell R. Co., 148 Mass. 513 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Alrob Enterprises, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    337 A.2d 497 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 7, 1975

    Butz v. Glover Livestock Comm’n Co., 411 U.S. 182, 187 , 93 S.Ct. 1455, 1459 , 36 L.Ed.2d 142 (1973). … Federal Communications Commission v. WOKO, Inc., 329 U.S. 223, 228 , 67 S.Ct. 213, 216 , 91 L.Ed. 204 (1946). In 2447 Good Hope Rd., Inc. v. District of Columbia A. B. C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Kalorama Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    640 A.2d 179 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 9, 1994

    With respect to the Board’s findings of fact, our concern is to determine whether substantial evidence of record supports each finding. Levy v. … Partnership v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Spring Valley Wesley Heights Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment

    644 A.2d 434 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1994

    Co. v. Public Service Comm’n of District of Columbia, 378 A.2d 1085, 1089 (D.C.1977). “Absent express statutory or regulatory authority, a regulatory agency may not impose remedial measures.” Davidson v. … Board.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department v. District of Columbia Public Employee Relations Board

    901 A.2d 784 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2006

    Postal Workers v. United States Postal Serv., 252 U.S.App. … Even where, in United Paper-workers Int’l Union, AFL-CIO v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In Re Fogel

    679 A.2d 1052 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 11, 1996

    Rogers v. United States, 566 A.2d 69, 73 (D.C.1989) (en banc) (citations omitted). … See North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970) (guilty plea with assertion of factual innocence). 4 . D.C. Code § 22-1204 , repealed, D.C.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Citizens Ass'n of Georgetown, Inc. v. District of Columbia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board

    410 A.2d 195 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 1979

    See Legislative Study Club, Inc. v. D.C. Board of Zoning Adjustment, D.C.App., 359 A.2d 153 (1976) (political advocacy group); Carpenter v. … Zoning Board of Appeals, 352 Mass. 54 , 223 N.E.2d 679 (1967) (token memberships allowed).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Rales v. Rales

    908 A.2d 64 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2006

    Rales relies solely upon Brown v. … The issue in Brown was whether the Board of Zoning Adjustment ("BZA”) had the authority to disqualify counsel.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • George Washington University Medical Center v. District of Columbia Board of Appeals & Review

    1987 D.C. 8 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 31, 1987

    See District of Columbia Hospital Association v. Barry, 498 A.2d 216, 217 (D.C. 1985). … Siler v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services, 525 A.2d 620, 622 (D.C.1987). Thus, in our view, this court lacks jurisdiction over the GW appeal at this time.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.